P: Population: Patients requiring single unit implant restoration in esthetic zone I: Intervention: Polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network abutment crown (VITA Enamic-VITA Zahnfabrik) C: Comparison: Lithium disilicate ceramic abutment crown (IPS e. max-Ivoclar Vivadent) O: Outcome: patient satisfaction , crestal bone loss and periodontal parameters T: Time: 12 months S :Randomized controlled trial research question:For patients receiving implants in esthetic zone, Does the use of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network hybrid abutment crown offer better patient satisfaction , less bone loss and better peri-implant clinical parameters when compared to lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crowns?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
36
hybrid ceramic material in the form of mesoblocks where the ceramic block is attached to a ti base .The whole assembly is screw retained superstructure.
high srength glass ceramic that can be milled in sections up to 1mm .
Inas adel mahmoud
Cairo, Egypt
patient satisfaction
using visual analogue scale (o-unsatisfied up to max 10 satisfied)
Time frame: 12 months
crestal bone loss
using digital subtraction technique
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.