This study will evaluate the efficacy of ipatasertib + paclitaxel versus placebo + paclitaxel in participants with histologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and in participants with locally advanced or metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+)/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast adenocarcinoma who are not suitable for endocrine therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
579
Ipatasertib, 400 milligrams (mg), administered orally once a day (QD) on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, elective withdrawal from the study, or study completion or termination.
Paclitaxel, 80 mg/square meter (m\^2), administered intravenously (IV) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, elective withdrawal from the study, or study completion or termination.
Matching placebo, administered orally QD on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, elective withdrawal from the study, or study completion or termination.
UCSD Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, United States
USC Norris Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
USC Norris Cancer Center; USC Oncology Hematology Newport Beach
Newport Beach, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente - Oakland
Oakland, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente - Roseville
Roseville, California, United States
Cohort A: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression, as determined locally by the investigator through the use of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v.1.1), or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, assessed up to 27 months for this outcome measure. Progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm). The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Time frame: From randomization up to 27 months
Cohort B: PFS
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression, as determined locally by the investigator through the use of RECIST v.1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, assessed up to 24.4 months for this outcome measure. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Abbreviation used in statistical analysis: PI3K=phosphoinositide 3-kinase and mTOR=mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor.
Time frame: From randomization up to 24.4 months
Cohort C: PFS
PFS for Cohort C was defined as the time from enrollment to the first occurrence of disease progression, as determined locally by the investigator through the use of RECIST v.1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, assessed up to 31 months for this outcome measure. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Time frame: From enrollment up to 31 months
Cohort A and B: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as percentage of participants with partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) on 2 consecutive occasions ≥4 weeks apart as determined by the investigator using RECIST v.1.1, assessed up to 27 months for Cohort A and up to 24.4 months for Cohort B, for this outcome measure. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
Time frame: From randomization up to 27 months for Cohort A and up to 24.4 months for Cohort B
Cohort C: ORR
ORR was defined as percentage of participants with PR or CR on 2 consecutive occasions ≥4 weeks apart as determined by the investigator using RECIST v.1.1, assessed up to 31 months for this outcome measure. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
Time frame: From enrollment up to 31 months
Cohort A and B: Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented OR (CR or PR) to PD, as determined locally by the investigator through the use of RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first assessed up to 27 months for Cohort A and up to 24.4 months for Cohort B, for this outcome measure. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Time frame: From randomization up to 27 months for Cohort A and up to 24.4 months for Cohort B
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
UC Davis; Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Sacramento Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente - San Francisco (2238 Geary)
San Francisco, California, United States
UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Ctr
San Francisco, California, United States
K. Permanente - San Jose
San Jose, California, United States
...and 166 more locations
Cohort C: DOR
DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented OR (CR or PR) to PD, as determined locally by the investigator through the use of RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, assessed up to 31 months for this outcome measure. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Time frame: From enrollment up to 31 months
Cohort A and B: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
CBR was defined as percentage of participants with an objective response (CR or PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 24 weeks, as determined by the investigator through the use of RECIST v.1.1. assessed up to From randomization up to 27 months for Cohort A and up to 24.4 months for Cohort B for this outcome measure. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
Time frame: From randomization up to 27 months for Cohort A and up to 24.4 months for Cohort B
Cohort C: CBR
CBR was defined as percentage of participants with an objective response (CR or PR), or SD for at least 24 weeks, as determined by the investigator through the use of RECIST v.1.1 assessed up to 31 months for this outcome measure. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
Time frame: From enrollment up to 31 months
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.
Time frame: From randomization/ enrollment (Cohort C) up to death from any cause, up to 45 months for Cohort A, up to 46 months for Cohort B and up to 31 months for Cohort C
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Global Health Status (GHS)/Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Score Measured by GHS/HRQoL Scale (Questions 29 and 30) of the EORTC QLQ-C30
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions covering symptoms, functioning, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The participant's assessment of overall HRQoL is assessed by using the last 2 questions (29 and 30) of the instrument, with each of these items based on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent), which are then combined into the GHS/QoL multi-item scale. The scores obtained for each question were averaged into a raw score for the scale, and this raw score for the scale was then subsequently linearly transformed to a scale score of 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better GHS/QoL. Negative change from Baseline values in the GHS/QoL change from baseline analysis indicated deterioration in HRQoL and positive values indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24 (cycle length=28 days)
Cohort C: Change From Baseline in GHS/HRQoL Score Measured by GHS/HRQoL Scale (Questions 29 and 30) of the EORTC QLQ-C30
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions covering symptoms, functioning, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The participant's assessment of overall HRQoL is assessed by using the last 2 questions (29 and 30) of the instrument, with each of these items based on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent), which are then combined into the GHS/QoL multi-item scale. The scores obtained for each question were averaged into a raw score for the scale, and this raw score for the scale was then subsequently linearly transformed to a scale score of 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better GHS/QoL. Negative change from Baseline values in the GHS/QoL change from baseline analysis indicated deterioration in HRQoL and positive values indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, and 44 (cycle length=28 days)
Cohort B: Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Pain
Time to deterioration in GHS/HRQoL was defined as the time from randomization to first observed ≥ 11-point increase from Baseline in pain scale score (Question 9 and 19) in EORTC QLQ-C30 linearly transformed GHS/HRQoL scale score, assessed up 24.4 months for this outcome measure. TTD was planned to be assessed only in cohort with HR+/HER2 - breast cancer participants (Cohort B). Questions 9 and 19 that assessed pain, used 4-point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). The scores were linearly transformed on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating increased severity in symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline up to 24.4 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. AEs were reported based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 4.0.
Time frame: Up to 58.9 months for Cohort A, up to 59.9 months for Cohort B and up to 45.5 months for Cohort C
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. AEs were reported based on the NCI CTCAE, Version 4.0. AESI include cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law. Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug, Grade \>= 3 fasting hyperglycemia, hepatotoxicity, diarrhea, rash, ALT/AST elevations. Grade \>= 2 colitis/enterocolitis.
Time frame: Up to 58.9 months for Cohort A, up to 59.9 months for Cohort B and up to 45.5 months for Cohort C
Cohorts A and B:Plasma Concentration of Ipatasertib
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1: 1 to 3 hours post dose, and on Day 15 of Cycle 3: 2 to 4 hours post dose (cycle length= 28 days)
Cohort C: Plasma Concentration of Ipatasertib
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1: 1 to 3 hours post dose, and on Day 15 of Cycle 3: 2 to 4 hours post dose (cycle length= 28 days)
Cohorts A and B: Plasma Concentration of G-037720
G-037720 was a metabolite of ipatasertib.
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1: 1 to 3 hours post dose, and on Day 15 of Cycle 3: 2 to 4 hours post dose (cycle length= 28 days )
Cohort C: Plasma Concentration of G-037720
G-037720 was a metabolite of ipatasertib.
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1: 1 to 3 hours post dose, and on Day 15 of Cycle 3: 2 to 4 hours post dose (cycle length= 28 days )
Cohort C: 1-year Event-free PFS Rate
PFS was defined as the time from enrollment to the first occurrence of disease progression, as determined locally by the investigator through the use of RECIST v.1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Event-free PFS rate was defined as percentage of participants who did not experience any event and survived at 1 year after enrollment. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point. As prespecified in the protocol, this outcome measure was applicable only to Cohort C.
Time frame: From enrollment until the occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred earlier, up to 1 year
Cohort C: 1-year Event-free OS Rate
OS was defined as the time from enrollment to death from any cause. Event-free OS rate was defined as percentage of participants who did not experience any event and survived at 1 year after enrollment. As prespecified in the protocol, this outcome measure was applicable only to Cohort C. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest decimal.
Time frame: From enrollment up to death from any cause, up to 1 year
Cohort C: Serum Concentration of Atezolizumab
As prespecified in the protocol, this outcome measure was applicable only to Cohort C.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1: 30 minutes post dose, predose on Day 15 of Cycle 1 and predose on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 and 16 (cycle length=28 days)
Cohort C: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab
The numbers of ADA-positive participants after drug administration were summarized for participants exposed to atezolizumab. As prespecified in the protocol, this outcome measure was applicable only to Cohort C.
Time frame: Up to 45.5 months