The primary objective of this study is to prospectively determine, at 12 months post-surgical repair of full thickness rotator cuff tears, the safety and efficacy of treating full thickness rotator cuff repairs with pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF). The hypothesis states that exposure to a pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) following surgical repair of a full thickness rotator cuff tendon tear reduces tendon re-tear rates. The strength of the shoulder muscles and the levels of pain in subjects after surgical repair of their rotator cuff adjunctively treated with an active PEMF device will also be measured.
This Clinical Investigation Plan (CIP) describes the prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) therapy as an adjunctive treatment to surgical repair of full thickness rotator cuff tears. Rotator cuff tears are common musculoskeletal injuries which often require surgical intervention. Unfortunately, post-repair prognosis is poor, and surgical repairs have been reported to fail in up to 94% of cases (Galatz et. al., 2004). Repaired tissue tends to be fibrotic, disorganized, and reattaches poorly to the bony insertion. To improve tendon-to-bone healing, many non-invasive therapeutic devices have been utilized post-operatively including therapeutic ultrasound and shock wave therapy (Lovric et. al., 2013; Springer and Badgett, 2015). In orthopedics, the use of these non-invasive therapeutic devices has become increasingly popular during the post-operative recovery period in an effort to enhance tissue healing. These devices are relatively inexpensive and easily obtainable and relatively easy to use, and are especially enticing as they can be brought into the patient's home and do not require frequent visits to the clinic. Additionally, non-invasive therapeutic devices can be used for a variety of applications, including promoting tissue healing prior to surgical intervention or in lieu of surgical intervention all together. Although there are numerous advantages to using non-invasive therapeutic devices, their efficacy has not yet been maximized. Based on the pre-clinical work presented (Tucker et. al., 2016; Huegel et. al., 2017), it is believed that pulsed electromagnetic fields may be an effective adjunctive treatment for patients who have undergone surgical repair of a torn rotator cuff.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
377
Active device emits PEMF signal; placebo/control device does not emit PEMF signal
The CORE Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Stanford University
Redwood City, California, United States
UCSF Orthopedics
San Francisco, California, United States
Sabesan Orthopedics Research
Atlantis, Florida, United States
Coastal Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Bradenton, Florida, United States
Holy Cross Hospital
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Andrews Institute
Gulf Breeze, Florida, United States
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Univ. of Maryland Dept of Orthopedics
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
...and 13 more locations
retear rate
A reduction in retear rates in subjects adjunctively treated with PEMF compared with those treated with a placebo (inactive) RCStim PEMF device following surgical repair of full thickness rotator cuff tears.
Time frame: 12 months
Muscle Strength
Strength to be measured using the IsoForceEvo2 dynamometer in subjects treated with PEMF treated and compared with subjects receiving the placebo/control PEMF device
Time frame: 12 months
Penn Shoulder Score
100 point scale with three subscales (pain, satisfaction, function) where a 12 pt increase in score with time after PEMF treatment is minimally clinically significant
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.