Nowadays there is a growing interest towards non-invasive assessment of urinary dysfunctions in clinical practice. The tendency to use uroflowmetry as a first-line screening tool is based on the inexpensiveness, time efficiency, comfort of the patient, etc. However, it is stated that uroflowmetry as a stand-alone study lacks the potential to make an accurate diagnosis. In regard to this, the International Continence Society indicated that the addition of pelvic floor electromyography might increase the accuracy of this assessment. Despite this recommendation, uroflowmetry in combination with electromyography has not been conducted in a healthy population. The initial objective of this study was to examine whether adding electromyography to standard uroflowmetry in a healthy paediatric population would change the representation of parameters, especially of voiding patterns. In addition, the influence of several factors on uroflow parameters was analysed to complement current literature.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
83
Isolated uroflow measurement
Uroflow measurement with superficial EMG testing of the pelvic floor
Ultrasound of post void residual urine
University Hospital
Ghent, Belgium
Uroflow curve pattern - Clinical assessment
Interpretation by pediatric urologist
Time frame: 2017
Uroflow curve pattern - Mathematical assessment
Interpretation using Flow index methodology
Time frame: 2017
Maximal flow
Qmax (millilitres/seconds)
Time frame: 2017
post-void residual urine
millilitres
Time frame: 2017
voiding time
seconds
Time frame: 2017
voided volume
millilitres
Time frame: 2017
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.