This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority multicenter clinical trial of azithromycin vs. placebo in adults presenting as outpatients with suspect Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) and a Procalcitonin (PCT) level of \< / = 0.25 ng/mL, as a strategy for reducing antibiotic prescriptions. The study is designed to compare the efficacy of azithromycin versus placebo on Day 5 (i.e., after 4 days of treatment) in subjects with suspect LRTI and PCT levels of \< / = 0.25 ng/mL at enrollment using a non-inferiority approach. The study will recruit potential subjects 18 years of age or older who are suspected to have LRTI. The enrollment cap will be 840 participants, for the goal of approximately 674 randomized participants who will be randomized 1:1 to receive oral azithromycin or placebo for five days. Randomized subjects will have efficacy measured from the time of the first dose of study drug (Day 1) through approximately Day 28. The Primary Objective is to compare the efficacy of azithromycin versus placebo on Day 5 (i.e., after 4 days of treatment) in subjects with suspect LRTI and PCT levels of \< / = 0.25 ng/mL at enrollment using a non-inferiority approach.
This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority multicenter clinical trial of azithromycin vs. placebo in adults presenting as outpatients with suspect Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) and a Procalcitonin (PCT) level of \< / = 0.25 ng/mL, as a strategy for reducing antibiotic prescriptions. The study is designed to compare the efficacy of azithromycin versus placebo on Day 5 (i.e., after 4 days of treatment) in subjects with suspect LRTI and PCT levels of \< / = 0.25 ng/mL at enrollment using a non-inferiority approach. The study will recruit potential subjects 18 years of age or older who are suspected to have LRTI. The enrollment cap will be 840 participants, for the goal of approximately 674 randomized participants who will be randomized 1:1 to receive oral azithromycin or placebo for five days. Randomized subjects will have efficacy measured from the time of the first dose of study drug (Day 1) through approximately Day 28. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of azithromycin versus placebo on Day 5 (i.e., after 4 days of treatment) in subjects with suspect LRTI and PCT levels of \< / = 0.25 ng/mL at enrollment using a non-inferiority approach. The secondary objectives are to compare:1) groups receiving azithromycin versus placebo with regard to all antibiotic use by Days 11 and 28; 2) groups receiving azithromycin versus placebo with regard to return visits to a physician's office or urgent care by Days 11 and 28; 3) groups receiving azithromycin versus placebo with regard to emergency department visits by Days 11 and 28; 4) groups receiving azithromycin versus placebo with regard to hospitalization by Days 11 and 28 if not hospitalized at the enrollment and randomization visit; 5) groups receiving azithromycin versus placebo with regard to improvement in presenting symptoms by Days 11 and 28; 6) the efficacy of azithromycin versus placebo on Day 11 in subjects with suspect LRTI and PCT levels of \< / = 0.25 ng/mL at enrollment using a non-inferiority approach; 7) the efficacy of azithromycin versus placebo on Day 28 in subjects with suspect LRTI and PCT levels of \< / = 0.25 ng/mL at enrollment using a non-inferiority approach; 8) the efficacy of azithromycin versus placebo in subjects with suspected LRTI and PCT levels of \< / = 0.25 ng/mL at Day 5 using a superiority approach, employing the "Response Adjusted for Days of Antibiotic Risk (RADAR)" methodology; 9) groups receiving azithromycin versus placebo in regard to solicited events by Day 5; 10) groups receiving azithromycin versus placebo in regard to hospitalization or visits to an Emergency Department (ED), outpatient clinic, or urgent care center for worsening or persistent LRTI after randomization by Day 5; 11) groups receiving azithromycin versus placebo in regard to improvement in vital sign abnormalities or symptoms present at enrollment, on Day 5; 12) groups receiving azithromycin versus placebo in regard to new vital sign abnormalities or symptoms on Day 5, or deterioration in symptoms relative to the enrollment visit on Day 5.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
514
Azithromycin is an azalide antibiotic and is derived from erythromycin used to treat many different types of infections caused by bacteria, such as respiratory infections.
Placebo will be a matching capsule the same size, weight, and color as the capsules containing Azithromycin tablets.
The VIDAS B.R.A.H.M.S PCT is an automated test for use on the VIDAS instruments for the determination of human procalcitonin in human serum or plasma using the Enzyme-Linked Fluorescent Assay (ELFA) technique.
The Hope Clinic of Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Atlanta VA Medical Center - Infectious Diseases Clinic
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Durham VA Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Duke Vaccine and Trials Unit
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Texas Medical Center - Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs
Houston, Texas, United States
Clinical Improvement at Day 5 Visit (D5V)
Clinical improvement at Day 5 Visit is defined as fulfilling all of the following criteria: 1. Improvement in at least two symptoms present at enrollment or one symptom and at least one vital sign abnormality present at enrollment 2. Absence of deterioration in any qualifying symptom or new vital sign abnormality not present at enrollment 3. Absence of fever in the day preceding or at the D5V 4. No medically attended visit to an ambulatory medical facility or hospitalization for persistent or worsening Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) at any time after randomization
Time frame: Day 5 Visit
Clinical Improvement at Day 11 Visit (D11V)
Clinical improvement at Day 11 Visit is defined as fulfilling all of the following criteria: 1. Improvement in at least two symptoms present at enrollment or one symptom and at least one vital sign abnormality present at enrollment 2. Absence of deterioration in any qualifying symptom or new vital sign abnormality not present at enrollment 3. Absence of fever in the day preceding or at the D11V 4. No medically attended visit to an ambulatory medical facility or hospitalization for persistent or worsening LRTI at any time after randomization The ITT population includes all participants with PCT = 0.25 ng/mL who were randomized to receive study product.
Time frame: Day 11 Visit
Clinical Improvement at Day 28 Visit (D28V)
Clinical improvement at Day 28 Visit is defined as fulfilling all of the following criteria: 1. Improvement in at least two symptoms present at enrollment or one symptom and at least one vital sign abnormality present at enrollment 2. Absence of deterioration in any qualifying symptom or new vital sign abnormality not present at enrollment 3. Absence of fever in the day preceding or at the D11V 4. No medically attended visit to an ambulatory medical facility or hospitalization for persistent or worsening LRTI at any time after randomization
Time frame: Day 28 Visit
Composite Overall Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) Assessed Employing a Superiority Analysis Using the "Response Adjusted for Days of Antibiotic Risk (RADAR)" Approach at Day 5 Visit
DOOR is a composite endpoint created using clinical outcomes from Day 1 through Day 5 Visit. It is based on adequate clinical improvement at Day 5 Visit and solicited events from Day 1 through Day 5 Visit. When comparing two participants with different ordinal clinical outcomes (OCOs), the participant with a better OCO receives a higher DOOR rank. When comparing two participants with the same OCOs, the participant with fewer days of antibiotic use receives a higher DOOR rank.
Time frame: Day 5 Visit
Number of Participants Exhibiting Improvement in One or More LRTI Symptoms or Fever at Day 11 Visit
Improvement in LRTI symptoms was defined as presence of at least one-step improvement in the symptom present at baseline. For fever, improvement was defined as changing from presence of fever at baseline to absence of fever at Day 11 Visit.
Time frame: Day 11 Visit
Number of Participants Exhibiting Improvement in One or More LRTI Symptoms or Fever at Day 28 Visit
Improvement in LRTI symptoms was defined as presence of at least one-step improvement in the symptom present at baseline. For fever, improvement was defined as changing from presence of fever at baseline to absence of fever at Day 28 Visit.
Time frame: Day 28 Visit
Number of Participants Exhibiting Improvement in at Least Two Presenting Signs or Symptoms at Day 5 Visit
Improvement in LRTI symptoms was defined as presence of at least one-step improvement in at least two symptoms present at baseline for participants who qualified based on two symptoms or improvement in one LRTI symptom present at baseline and normalization of one abnormal vital sign at Day 5 Visit for participants who qualified based on one symptom and one vital sign abnormality.
Time frame: Day 5 Visit
Number of Participants Exhibiting Worsening or Deterioration in One or More Symptoms at Day 5 Visit
Clinical deterioration at D5V is defined as at least one-step deterioration (worsening from mild to moderate for example) in any qualifying symptoms or presence of a new vital abnormality at D5V not present at enrollment.
Time frame: Day 5 Visit
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Hospitalization or Visits to an Emergency Department (ED), Outpatient Clinic, or Urgent Care Center (After Randomization) for Worsening or Persistent Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
This table summarizes the number and percentage of participants reporting any medically attended visits any time after randomization. Note that receipt of a non-study antibiotic after study Day 5 Visit will was not regarded as satisfying this definition if it is related to a new non-respiratory process that is unrelated to the prior diagnosis of LRTI.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 5 Visit
Number of Participants Reporting Solicited Adverse Events From Day 1 Through Day 5 Visit
This table summarizes the number and percentage of participants experiencing any solicited events of mild, moderate or severe severity from Day 1 to Day 5 Visit.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 5 Visit
Number of Participants With One or More Emergency Department Visits for Persistent or Worsening Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) by Day 11 Visit
This table summarizes the number of participants with one or more Emergency Department Visits for Persistent or Worsening Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) from Day 1 through Day 11 Visit.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 11
Number of Participants With One or More Emergency Department Visits for Persistent or Worsening Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) by Day 28 Visit
This table summarizes the number of participants with one or more Emergency Department Visits for Persistent or Worsening Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) in Azithromycin Group from Day 1 through Day 28 Visit.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 28 Visit
Number of Participants With One or More Hospitalizations (if Not Hospitalized at Enrollment) for Persistent or Worsening Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) by Day 11 Visit
This table summarizes the number of participants with one or more hospitalizations for Persistent or Worsening Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) from Day 1 through Day 11 Visit.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 11 Visit
Number of Participants With One or More Hospitalizations (if Not Hospitalized at Enrollment) for Persistent or Worsening Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) by Day 28 Visit
This table summarizes the number of participants with one or more hospitalizations for Persistent or Worsening Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) from Day 1 through Day 28 Visit.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 28 Visit
Number of Participants With One or More Unplanned Return to a Physician's Office or Urgent Care for Persistent or Worsening Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) by Day 11 Visit
This table summarizes the number of participants with one or more unplanned Return to a Physician's Office or Urgent Care for Persistent or Worsening Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) from Day 1 through Day 11 Visit.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 11 Visit
Number of Participants With One or More Unplanned Return to a Physician's Office or Urgent Care for Persistent or Worsening Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) by Day 28 Visit
This table summarizes the number of participants with one or more unplanned Return to a Physician's Office or Urgent Care for Persistent or Worsening Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) from Day 1 through Day 28 Visit.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 28 Visit
Number of Participants With a New Occurrence of a Vital Sign Abnormality at Day 5 Visit
This table summarizes the number and percentage of participants experiencing new vital signs abnormalities at Day 5 Visit that were not present at baseline.
Time frame: Day 5 Visit
Quantification of All Antibiotic Use From Day 1 Through Day 11 Visit
The table summarizes the mean number of days of antibiotic use including study and non-study antibiotics for participants from Day 1 through Day 11 Visit.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 11 Visit
Quantification of All Antibiotic Use From Day 1 Through Day 28 Visit
The table summarizes the mean number of days of antibiotic use including study and non-study antibiotics for participants from Day 1 through Day 28 Visit.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 28 Visit
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.