Development and evaluation of an online intervention addressing sexual functioning in gay and bisexual men (GBM) after prostate cancer treatment.
This study advances research in three areas. First, prostate cancer is the second most common cancer among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men with documented disparities, yet it is severely under-researched. Because gay sex differs from vaginal sex, physiologically; the results from 614 studies focused on heterosexual men likely do not generalize to gay and bisexual men(GBM) with prostate cancer. There have been no rehabilitation studies specific to GBM survivors of prostate cancer, so clinicians have no relevant studies to inform best practice with their GBM patients. Second, most prostate cancer studies have tested one or rehabilitation components. The investigators will conduct the first treatment study of a state of clinical practice comprehensive rehabilitation program on GBM's quality of life, including on both urinary and sexual function and bother measures. Third, almost all prostate cancer studies have focused on men recently treated for prostate cancer. The long-term objective of this research is to improve the health of gay and bisexual survivors of Prostate cancer and to provide an evidence base for rehabilitation. The Investigators will develop an online rehabilitation program tailored for GBM that addresses both the sexual and urinary effects of prostate cancer treatment. In addition, The Investigators will conduct a comparative recruitment study to identify best methods to recruit 450 GBM with Prostate cancer. Finally, the Investigators will evaluate the effects of the tailored rehabilitation program on sexual and urinary outcomes. The Investigators will conduct a 24 month, randomized controlled trial of structured rehabilitation versus routine care. The Investigators will study both GBM recently treated (last 2 years) and GBM post-treatment (2+ years), using a stratified design. This randomized control trial will identify whether a structured rehabilitation program is effective in addressing the major sexual and urinary problems caused by Prostate cancer treatment. As the first treatment study to focus on GBM with Prostate cancer (and also on oral and anal sex), it addresses a long-standing health disparity. The study has high potential to transform rehabilitation for GBM with Prostate cancer, provide a critical evidence base for clinicians, and inform rehabilitation outcomes for all Prostate cancer survivors.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
403
Multi-component, structured, biopsychosocial, online interactive program to address the sexual and urinary effects of prostate cancer treatment
usual care, surveys every 3 months
University of Minnesota Twin Cities Campus
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Urinary Function Scores
The Urinary Function domain of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-50) scale was used to assess the frequency of urinary symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less frequency of urinary symptoms.
Time frame: 24 months
Sexual Functioning Scores
The Sexual Functioning domain of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-50) scale was used to assess the frequency of sexual functioning symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less frequency of sexual functioning symptoms.
Time frame: 24 months
Intervention Acceptability
Acceptability was measured by how much intervention group participants would recommend the intervention to a friend (if he had prostate cancer). This single Likert-type item has five response options from 1=strongly agree to 5= strongly disagree. Acceptability will be measured by adding those who answered 1=strongly agree or 2=agree on this item.
Time frame: 3-month follow-up
Intervention Feasibility
Feasibility will be measured by monitoring the number of intervention participants who could access the intervention webpage at least once within the first three months of the study.
Time frame: 3-month follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.