The investigators hypothesize that the T1 Dixon post-Gadolinium and T2 Dixon sequences will show good diagnostic performances for active sacroiliitis compared to the reference test (Short tau inversion recovery) and clinical-biological criteria, which will allow a better diagnosis of active sacroiliitis
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
5
Coronal oblique T1, Coronal oblique and axial STIR, Coronal oblique T1 Dixon, Coronal oblique and Axial T2 Dixon and T1 Dixon post Gadolinium
CHU Lapeyronie
Montpellier, France
CHU Nimes
Nîmes, France
Diagnostic performance of T1 Dixon post-Gadolinium and T2 Dixon for active sacroiliitis, according to subchondral edema status
compared to ASAS criteria incorporating Short tau inversion recovery and clinic-biological elements
Time frame: Time 0
Diagnosis of enthesitis from T1 Gadolinium Dixon sequence vs ASAS criteria
Yes/no
Time frame: Time 0
Diagnosis of synovitis from T2 Dixon and T1 Gadolinium Dixon sequences vs ASAS criteria
Yes/no
Time frame: Time 0
Diagnosis of chronic sacroiliite (erosion or chondral scler osis, or fatty spinal replacement) by T1 Dixon pre-Gadolinium
Yes/No
Time frame: Time 0
Diagnosis of chronic sacroiliite (erosion or chondral sclerosis, or fatty spinal replacement) by conventional sequences
Yes/no
Time frame: Time 0
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.