Medtronic's MOSAIC Bioprosthesis Versus Baxter Carpentier-Edwards SAV Porcine Valve

Overview

The study compares the clinical performance of the Mosaic valve with that of the Baxter valve (Carpentier-Edwards) which is widely used throughout the UK and is considered to be the "bench mark". Specific objectives will be to determine structural failure and valve explantation rates, thromboembolic events and mortality rates for each valve. Haemodynamic assessments will also be made using echocardiography to measure gradients across the valves and changes in left ventricular function and wall thickness.

The bioprostheses (xenografts) to be used in this study are third generation valves derived from porcine aortic valves. The chief advantage over mechanical prostheses is that they do not require lifelong anticoagulation with warfarin with its attendant risks of haemorrhage if the patient becomes over anticoagulated, or thromboembolism if anticoagulation is inadequate. However their disadvantage is that they are prone to calcification and mechanical failure over time. Because of this, bioprosthetic valves are usually reserved for older patients in whom the chance of repeat surgery is reduced. The Medtronic Mosaic stented bioprosthesis has been recently introduced. The Mosaic bioprosthesis utilizes Physiological Fixation (root fixation with zero pressure differential across the valve leaflets). This allows valves to maintain their natural leaflet structure and root geometry. The Mosaic bioprosthesis uses the AOA anti-mineralisation treatment. Developed in collaboration with Biomedical Design, Inc., AOA has been shown in multiple animal studies to be an effective treatment in preventing leaflet calcification. Baxter currently produces the Carpentier Edwards SAV porcine bioprosthesis that has abundant long-term follow-up data and is widely used. Low pressure fixation (less than 1.5mmHg) and anti-mineralisation treatment with FET 80TM are used in its preparation. The stent (which supports the cusps) has been designed to allow for the wider opening angle of the softer leaflets. These features aim to improve on the haemodynamic performance of earlier generation valves and offer the potential for increased durability. Early results look promising with excellent haemodynamic parameters and remarkably low rates of structural failure. If zero pressure fixation and anti-mineralisation treatment can be shown to increase the longevity of the bioprosthetic valve, the age criteria for implantation will undoubtedly be lowered allowing a younger cohort of patients to benefit from anticoagulation-free therapy and freedom from associated morbidities.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes