A multicentre, parallel group, two arm, single-blinded randomized clinical trial, assessing the efficacy of a patient-tailored catheter ablation (CA) strategy guided by atrial low voltage area mapping in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) when compared to PVI alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).
The optimal CA strategy for persistent AF remains unknown. Current data highlight the need for a better understanding of the substrate and mechanisms of arrhythmia maintenance in this population. Atrial low voltage area (LVA)-based catheter ablation has recently emerged as a promising strategy for ablation of AF. However, the available data has limitations that preclude definitive conclusions regarding the utility of this strategy (no data from multicenter, randomized studies available). Further research is needed to assess the role of LVA-based ablation for persistent AF. The Investigators hypothesize that catheter ablation of persistent AF (PeAF) tailored to abolish abnormal atrial substrate identified by intracardiac atrial (LVA) mapping in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) will result in higher procedural success rates when compared to PVI alone. The study will recruit 502 patients with PeAF (251 per treatment arm) who are candidates for CA ablation of AF according to the treating physician (and in agreement with current practice guidelines). Subjects will be recruited over a 42-month period. The total duration of the study is 60 months. Prior to undergoing catheter ablation subjects will be seen by the investigator/ research assistant and the following data will be collected: i. Age and sex ii. Structural heart disease if present iii. CHADS2VASc score iv. DR-FLASH score v. NYHA class vi. Current medications vii. Duration of uninterrupted AF viii. Height and weight ix. Echocardiogram and other cardiac imaging results (within previous 24 months, including assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial volume and valve function) x. ECG, Holter or loop monitor recording (within past 36 months) documenting AF. Subjects will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo wide area circumferential ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI- control arm) or wide area circumferential ablation PVI and atrial LVA ablation (experimental arm). Randomization will be stratified by centre and by sex. Subjects will be randomized prior to the procedure. Enrolled subjects will have a clinical follow-up visit at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after the ablation procedure, defined as Holter monitoring with equipment capable of recording 14 days of continuous ambulatory ECG. Patients will be followed for 36 months or until the last recruited patient completes the mandatory 18-month follow-up visit. The results of monitoring will be interpreted at a centralized core lab, and the results will be adjudicated by an arrhythmia specialist blinded to treatment group. A total of three questionnaires will be administered throughout the study, each at a specific time point. The Quality of Life (EQ-5D), CCS-Severity of AF scale, and Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of life (AFEQT) will be completed at baseline, and at the 12-month and 18-month visit. Concomitant medical therapy will be selected according to the treating physician. All subjects will be maintained on systemic oral anticoagulation for at least 2 months following catheter ablation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
510
Wide area circumferential catheter ablation for pulmonary vein isolation of persistent atrial fibrillation
Libin Cardiovascular Institute
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
QEII Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Rate of documented (>30s) AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia occuring from day 91 to 18 months post ablation
Documented AF, Aflutter or AT by ECG, holter or external loop monitoring and has a duration of at least 30 seconds
Time frame: day 91 post ablation to 18 months
Composite safety endpoints
Procedure related complications at any time (stroke, PV stenosis, pericarditis, cardiac perforation, major bleeding) and/or death
Time frame: Up to 18 months
AF burden
Documented assessment of AF burden
Time frame: At 12 months and 18 months
Need for repeat ablation procedure for AF, AFl or AT
Documented by ECG, holter or ECG loop recorder
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Need for emergency room visits or hospitalization
Hospital admission for \> 24 hours and emergency room admission
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Quality of Life assessment with EQ5D
Assess the participants quality of life
Time frame: Baseline to 18months
Time to first recurrence at 18 months according to sex and atrial low voltage area extent
Recurrence of AF, AFl or AT
Time frame: 18 months
Total ablation delivery time
RF ablation time
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Southlake Regional Health Centre
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rouge Valley Regional Heart Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CHUM)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
...and 4 more locations
Time frame: Day of ablation procedure
Total procedure duration
Start of ablation to end of ablation
Time frame: Day of ablation procedure
Quality of life analyses
Using EQ-5D general quality of life score, and AF severity scale (symptoms and functionality)
Time frame: 18 months
Effect of Atrial Fibrillation on Quality of Life using AFEQT
Assess the participants quality of life due to atrial fibrillation
Time frame: Baseline to 18months