Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by chronic diffuse pain and affects 0.5 to 5% of the population, with a higher prevalence in women1. This condition is characterized by joint and muscle pain, also associated with fatigue, migraine, sleeps disorders, depression and irritable bowel syndrome2. The presentation of these various symptoms varies greatly from one patient to another, with great heterogeneity in clinical, physical, social, psychological and therapeutic responses. . A recent parliamentary inquiry report called for recognition of the disease and recommended to build a unified care path for patients; a collective expertise is led by INSERM to help in patient care. Faced with the heterogeneity of FM, several international studies have attempted to identify subgroups of patients based essentially on clinical symptoms of the disease3-8, including a recent Korean study of 313 patients9, which suggested four groups, but with methodological limitations, not taking into account the new criteria10 for evaluating FM. Recent studies have also shown that there is a peripheral neuropathic component in the mechanisms of this pathology, demonstrated by a decrease in the density of the epidermal nerve fibers11-12, called small fiber neuropathy (SFN) neuropathy. It is an attack of small sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers, causing pain, paresthesia as well as disturbances of the autonomous system. Other studies also suggested that a significant proportion of patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia had SFN, demonstrated by cutaneous biopsy13-14 or confocal microscopy of the cornea15. A new device, the Sudoscan®, makes it possible to detect a SFN much simpler, faster and less invasive than the technique of ophthalmology or biopsy. Although this Sudoscan® test has been used extensively in conditions such as diabetes16-19, no study has been used to assess the presence of SFN in FM. The aim of this pilot study is to identify the prevalence of SFN in FM patients, using this new non-invasive device, in order to have a better defined representation of the prevalence of small-fiber neuropathy in an FM population compared to a group of healthy volunteer matched in age, sex, BMI and by menopausal status for women.
Only one visit (2 to 3h) : Inclusion of the patient Clinical examination ; evaluation of pain for FM patients Measurement of the electrochemical conductance of the hands and feet using Sudoscan® Evaluation of quality of life, anxiety, depression, sleep quality, fatigue, catastrophizing and social precarity End of study
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
Sudoscan® is a new device that provides rapid, non-invasive and reproducible quantitative assessment of sweat function. It makes it possible to measure the ability of the sweat glands to release chloride ions in response to electrochemical activation and thus to detect the presence of a neuropathy with small fibers. This new device therefore makes it possible to detect an SFN in a much simpler and faster way than the technique of ophthalmology, or biopsy. Sudoscan® has been tested to assess the neuropathies of small nerve fibers in several diseases, in particular diabetes, chemotherapy-induced polyneuropathy, familial amyloid polyneuropathy or Fabry disease. The interest of Sudoscan® lies in the fact that this device is non-invasive and rapid. Its diagnostic value has been compared with other neurophysiological tests.
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
RECRUITINGMeasure of the electrochemical conductance (µS) using Sudoscan®
Evaluation of the prevalence of fibromyalgia patients with small fibro neuropathy in comparison with healthy volunteers by measuring the electrochemical conductance of the palms of the hands (middle right and left hands) and feet (middle right and left) in μS using Sudoscan®.
Time frame: at day 1
Biometric criteria
Collection of the age in years
Time frame: at day 1
Biometric criteria
Collection of sex, (male or female)
Time frame: at day 1
Biometric criteria
Collection weight in kilograms, height in meters, weight and eight will be combined to report BMI in kg/m²,
Time frame: at day 1
Biometric criteria
phototype Fitzpatrick classification
Time frame: at day 1
Numerical scale
This scale allows the patient to note pain on a graduation with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10. Higher value represent worse outcome.
Time frame: at day 1
Brief Pain Inventory
The BPI gives two main scores: a pain severity score and a pain interference score
Time frame: at day 1
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
The revised FIQ questionnaire is a 10-item self-questionnaire that assesses the impact of fibromyalgia. The first item is subdivided into 10 questions that assess the impact of the disease in everyday life
Time frame: at day 1
Quality of life (SF-12)
12 questions and an index is determined for both physical and mental health (0-100). Higher scores indicate greater physical and mental health
Time frame: at day 1
Anxiety and Depression (HAD)
The HAD scale is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire completed by the patient. These items are divided into two subscales: 7 items to assess depression and 7 items to assess anxiety. Higher value represent worse outcome.
Time frame: at day 1
Depression (Beck Depression Inventory)
Each item consists of 4 sentences corresponding to 4 degrees of increasing intensity of a symptom: from 0 to 3. In the counting, it is necessary to take into account the highest rating chosen for the same series. The overall score is obtained by adding the scores of the 13 items. The range of the scale is from 0 to 39. The higher the score, the more the subject is depressed.
Time frame: at day 1
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
19-item self-administered questionnaire used to assess the quality of sleep. Higher value represent worse quality of sleep.
Time frame: at day 1
Chronic fatigue Severity Scale
9-item self-questionnaire to assess the patient's fatigue intensity. The patient is asked to circle a number from 1 to 7 for each question, a low value representing a low intensity. Higher value represents worse fatigue.
Time frame: at day 1
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
This questionnaire consists of 13 items. The patient will have to indicate how much he has thoughts or emotions when he feels pain by giving a score between 0 and 4, 0: not at all, 4: all the time. The final score is the sum of the scores for each question. Higher value represent worse outcome.
Time frame: at day 1
Assessment of socio-professional category, precariousness and health inequalities (Score EPICES).
The EPICES questionnaire consists of 11 binary questions (yes / no) to calculate an individual score indicating the precariousness and inequalities of health ranging from 0 to 100. Higher value represent worse outcome.
Time frame: at day 1
Measure of the electrochemical conductance (µS) using Sudoscan®
Assess the reproducibility (2 passes) of Sudoscan® in each participant: measurement of the electrochemical conductance of the palms of the hands (middle right and left hands) and feet (middle right and left) in μS using the Sudoscan®, 30 minutes after the first measurement.
Time frame: at day 1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.