The aim of the study was to perform a randomized controlled clinical study in order to compare the effects of a bovine derived xenograft (with 10% collagen) + a bioabsorbable membrane (control group, CG) vs a bovine derived xenograft (with 10% collagen) alone (test group, TG) on the surgical treatment of mandibular type II furcation defects.
The aim of the study was to perform a randomized controlled clinical study in order to compare the effects of a bovine derived xenograft (with 10% collagen) + a bioabsorbable membrane (control group, CG) vs a bovine derived xenograft (with 10% collagen) alone (test group, TG) on the surgical treatment of mandibular type II furcation defects. The patients all underwent the same surgical intervention with the only difference between the two groups being the use or not of a collagen membrane.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
19
Elevation of a flap in order to access the treated furcation
Biomaterial for periodontal surgery
Biomaterial for periodontal surgery
Horizontal Probing Attachment Level
PAL-H
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.