The INTENSITY-HIGH study aims to answer if there are any limits to LDL reduction in relation to benefiting vascular health, exploring the mechanisms by which secondary prevention in patients with established heart disease may benefit from even lower LDL levels. By using PCSK9 inhibitors such as Alirocumab, very low LDL cholesterol levels not previously encountered in statin trials, can be achieved in patients with established heart disease on top of intensive statin treatment. This research is being carried out because it is unclear what the lowest threshold of LDL cholesterol should be to attain significant reductions in CV risk in stable cardiovascular patients. It is unknown whether there is a true limit of LDL cholesterol below which there is no further improvement in endothelial function in stable cardiovascular patients, and, whether this is associated with a reduction in markers of both systemic and vascular inflammation. Defining this may help identify individuals from the general population who may benefit from more aggressive lipid lowering treatment than standard statin treatment in terms of CV morbidity and mortality. This study will be conducted in patients with stable cardiovascular disease, where they will be randomized to receive either a combination of Alirocumab and statin, or Ezetimibe plus statin. 60 patients will be recruited to this single center, randomized, open label, parallel group, mechanistic physiological study which will be conducted at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. In order to be eligible for enrollment to the study, some patients may have to complete a 4 week washout period on a suitable statin therapy. The total study duration for each participant will be approximately 14 weeks, where a series of non-invasive vascular studies and medical imaging assessments which will be conducted to observe vascular/systemic inflammation and to assess endothelial vascular function.This study is funded by JP Moulton Charitable Foundation.
The INTENSITY-HIGH study primarily seeks to explore the physiological mechanisms (mainly using endothelial function and vascular imaging of inflammation) by which secondary prevention in patients with established cardiovascular disease may benefit from even lower LDL levels using PCSK9 therapies. This will then set the basis for potential changes to guidelines about what a "healthy cholesterol" level should be and the targets these should be achieving, or indeed if there is a plateau beyond which there is no further benefit on surrogates of CV disease. Endothelial function can be measured in the peripheral vasculature in a number of different ways, which include venous occlusion plethysmography with intra-arterial infusions of acetylcholine, ischemia flow-mediated endothelium-dependent dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery, reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) and others. A venous plethysmography measure of forearm blood flow to intra-arterial acetylcholine infusion is the most sensitive and direct measurement of endothelium release of nitric oxides, but is more invasive than other techniques. FMD is non-invasive and measures changes in the brachial artery to ischemia. It is acknowledged that whilst FMD has a larger coefficient variation and is more technician dependent, it is more patient-friendly in that it is of shorter duration procedure wise, is non-invasive and is repeatable over a short period; therefore we have employed this technique in this study to improve chances of patient acceptability. RH-PAT is an alternative non-invasive assessment which measures volume changes at the fingertip (a surrogate of reactive hyperemia), is easy to implement and is not operator dependent. However, as yet it remains not well validated. Therefore, flow mediated dilatation has been selected for this study. Metabolically active inflammatory cells utilize more glucose than non-activated cells, and the degree of metabolic activity can be measured using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). Cellular FDG uptake is largely irreversible and correlates with glucose usage and macrophage numbers in both tumor cells and atherosclerotic plaques \[38, 39\]. FDG PET imaging has been successfully used to determine culprit plaques responsible for TIA and stroke \[4042\]. The signal has also been shown to be responsive to therapy, with clear reductions in FDG uptake noted in both humans and animal models of atherosclerosis \[43, 44\]. In addition, very recently, it has been shown that FDG-PET/CT is a reliable technique to assess changes in plaque structure with good reproducibility \[40\]. Taken together, these findings suggest a role for FDG PET/CT imaging in the assessment of the antiinflammatory potential of novel compounds such as PCSK9 therapies.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
Dosing to be performed by subcutaneous injection in clinic
Patients will be instructed to take once daily at night.
Patients will be instructed to take once daily at night. Atorvastatin will be the preferred statin option for those with eGFR \< 60 ml/min/1.73m2. Patient may be required to complete a 4 week run-in period on a statin prior to entering the study (dependent on eligibility)
Patients will be instructed to take once daily at night. Atorvastatin will be the preferred statin option for those with eGFR \< 60 ml/min/1.73m2. Patient may be required to complete a 4 week run-in period on a statin prior to entering the study (dependent on eligibility)
Patients will be instructed to take once daily at night. Rosuvastatin only to be prescribed if atorvastatin and simvastatin are not previously tolerated. Patient may be required to complete a 4 week run-in period on a statin prior to entering the study (dependent on eligibility)
Patients will be instructed to take once daily at night. Rosuvastatin only to be prescribed if atorvastatin and simvastatin are not previously tolerated. Patient may be required to complete a 4 week run-in period on a statin prior to entering the study (dependent on eligibility)
Patients will be instructed to take once daily at night. Patient may be required to complete a 4 week run-in period on a statin prior to entering the study (dependent on eligibility)
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
Vascular inflammation (Standard Uptake Value) - Carotid artery
Change in vascular inflammation in the carotid artery between Alirocumab and Ezetimibe treatment regimes (Vascular inflammation will be quantified by calculating the Standard Uptake Value \[SUV\])
Time frame: 8 weeks
Vascular inflammation (Tissue to Background Ratio TBR) - Carotid artery
Change in vascular inflammation in the carotid artery between Alirocumab and Ezetimibe treatment regimes (Vascular inflammation will be quantified by calculating the Tissue to Background Ratio \[TBR\])
Time frame: 8 weeks
Vascular inflammation (Standard Uptake Value) - Aortic artery
Change in vascular inflammation in the aortic artery between Alirocumab and Ezetimibe treatment regimes (Vascular inflammation will be quantified by calculating the Standard Uptake Value \[SUV\])
Time frame: 8 weeks
Vascular inflammation (Tissue to Background Ratio TBR) - Aortic artery
Change in vascular inflammation in the aortic artery between Alirocumab and Ezetimibe treatment regimes (Vascular inflammation will be quantified by calculating the Tissue to Background Ratio \[TBR\])
Time frame: 8 weeks
Endothelial-dependent vasodilatation (as measured by Flow Mediated Dilatation using high-resolution vascular ultrasound)
Comparing the effects of Alirocumab or Ezetimibe treatment regimes on Flow Mediated Dilatation (a surrogate of endothelial-dependent vasodilatation)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Endothelial-independent vasodilatation (as measured by Flow Mediated Dilatation using high-resolution vascular ultrasound)
Comparing the effects of Alirocumab or Ezetimibe treatment regimes on sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) response to Flow Mediated Dilatation (a surrogate of endothelial-independent vasodilatation)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Augmentation index (an indicator of arterial stiffness)
Change in Augmentation Index between visits and between Alirocumab or Ezetimibe treatment regimes
Time frame: 8 weeks
Pulse wave velocity
Change in aortic Pulse Wave Velocity between visits and between Alirocumab or Ezetimibe treatment regimes
Time frame: 8 weeks
Carotid IMT
Change in Carotid IMT between visits and between Alirocumab or Ezetimibe treatment regimes
Time frame: 8 weeks
Systemic inflammation (as measured by lipid profile)
Change in systemic inflammation (as measured by lipid profile) between visits and between Alirocumab or Ezetimibe treatment regimes
Time frame: 8 weeks
Systemic inflammation (as measured by hsCRP)
Change in systemic inflammation (as measured by hsCRP) between visits and between Alirocumab or Ezetimibe treatment regimes
Time frame: 8 weeks
Systemic inflammation (as measured by MMP9)
Change in systemic inflammation (as measured by MMP9) between visits and between Alirocumab or Ezetimibe treatment regimes
Time frame: 8 weeks
Systemic inflammation (as measured by IL2)
Change in systemic inflammation (as measured by IL2) between visits and between Alirocumab or Ezetimibe treatment regimes
Time frame: 8 weeks
Systemic inflammation (as measured by IL6)
Change in systemic inflammation (as measured by IL6) between visits and between Alirocumab or Ezetimibe treatment regimes
Time frame: 8 weeks
Systemic inflammation (as measured by oxLDL lipid subfractions)
Change in systemic inflammation (as measured by oxLDL lipid subfractions) between visits and between Alirocumab or Ezetimibe treatment regimes
Time frame: 8 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.