Sepsis remains a major challenge, even in modern intensive care medicine. The identification of the causative pathogen is crucial for an early optimization of the antimicrobial treatment regime in patients with sepsis. In this context, culture-based diagnostic procedures (e.g. blood cultures) represent the standard of care, although they are associated with relevant limitations. Therefore, culture independent methods (e.g. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)) seem to be an attractive alternative. By the identification of circulating cell-free DNA in the blood and the use of the quantitative sepsis indicating quantifier (SIQ) score, causing pathogens can be identified and potential contaminations can be excluded. The goal of the presented study is therefore, to assess the diagnostic performance of a NGS-based approach for the detection of relevant infecting organisms in a big cohort of septic patients (n=500). Moreover, the plausibility of this NGS-based approach will be estimated by a panel of independent clinical specialists, retrospectively identifying potential changes in patients´ management based on NGS results.
Sepsis remains a major challenge, even in modern intensive care medicine. The identification of the causative pathogen is crucial for an early optimization of the antimicrobial treatment regime in patients with sepsis. In this context, culture-based diagnostic procedures (e.g., blood cultures) represent the standard of care, although they are associated with relevant limitations. Accordingly, culture-independent molecular diagnostic procedures might be of help for the identification of the causative pathogen in infected patients. Especially the concept of an unbiased sequence analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma samples of septic patients by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has recently been identified to be a promising diagnostic platform for critically ill patients suffering from bloodstream infections. Although this new approach might be more sensitive and specific than culture-based state-of-the-art technologies, additional clinical trials are needed to exactly define the performance as well as clinical value of a NGS-based approach. Next GeneSiS is a prospective, observational, non-interventional, multicenter study to assess the diagnostic performance of a NGS-based approach for the detection of relevant infecting organisms in patients with suspected or proven sepsis (according to recent sepsis definitions \[sepsis-3\]) by the use of the quantitative sepsis indicating quantifier (SIQ) score in comparison to standard (culture-based) microbiological testings. Moreover, the clinical value of this NGS-based approach will be estimated by a panel of independent clinical specialists, retrospectively identifying potential changes in patients´ management based on NGS results. Further subgroup analyses will focus on the clinical value especially for patients suffering from a failure of empiric treatment within the first three days after onset (as assessed by (1.) death of the patient or lack of improvement of the patient´s clinical condition (in terms of an inadequate decrease of SOFA-score) or (2.) persistent high procalcitonin levels). This prospective, observational, non-interventional, multicenter study trial for the first time investigates the performance as well as the clinical value of a NGS based approach for the detection of bacteremia in patients with sepsis and may therefore be a pivotal step toward the clinical use of NGS in this indication. Two sets of blood cultures (2x aerobic / 2x anaerobic) will be collected at study inclusion (=Onset) as well as 72 hours afterwards (=72h). In parallel, plasma samples for NGS-based measurements need to be obtained as described previously. Further blood samples for NGS-based measurements can be collected whenever physicians order blood cultures (2x aerobic / 2x anaerobic) because of the clinical suspicion of a bloodstream infection (BSI) within the first 3 days after study inclusion. Results of microbiological routine diagnostics in specimens different from blood (e.g. body fluid, tissue, bronchoalveolar lavage, endotracheal aspirate) will be used for further analyses when they are obtained within a timeframe of ≤72 hours prior or after the timepoints for NGS-based measurements. Clinical data collection and (if possible) PCT measurements will be performed at Onset as well as at 72h after study inclusion. The final outcome evaluation of patients will be performed at 28 days.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
500
In 500 patients with suspected or proven sepsis or septic shock (according to the Sepsis-3 definitions), patients´ characteristics and routine blood parameters will be determined at sepsis onset as well as 72 hours afterwards. At the same time points, 2 sets of blood cultures and one blood tube for Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)-diagnostics will be collected. An evaluation of outcome will be performed at 28 days after sepsis onset.
RWTH Aachen University
Aachen, Germany
Klinikum Mittelbaden Baden-Baden Balg
Baden-Baden, Germany
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethel gGmbH
Bielefeld, Germany
University Hospital Bonn
Bonn, Germany
Klinikum Bremerhaven Reinkenheide gGmbH
Bremerhaven, Germany
University Hospital Köln
Cologne, Germany
Duesseldorf University Hospital
Düsseldorf, Germany
University Hospital Essen
Essen, Germany
University Hospital Frankfurt
Frankfurt, Germany
...and 11 more locations
Sensitivity [%] (of the NGS-based SIQ-score in comparison to blood culture diagnostics, as the goldstandard for the identification of the causative pathogen in sepsis)
Proportion of positives that are correctly identified as such.
Time frame: 2 years
Specificity [%] (of the NGS-based SIQ-score in comparison to blood culture diagnostics, as the goldstandard for the identification of the causative pathogen in sepsis)
Proportion of negatives that are correctly identified as such.
Time frame: 2 years
Positive predictive value [%] (of the NGS-based SIQ-score in comparison to blood culture diagnostics, as the goldstandard for the identification of the causative pathogen in sepsis)
Proportion of positives that are true positive.
Time frame: 2 years
Negative predictive value [%] (of the NGS-based SIQ-score in comparison to blood culture diagnostics, as the goldstandard for the identification of the causative pathogen in sepsis)
Proportion of negatives that are true negative.
Time frame: 2 years
Cohen's kappa coefficient [no measuring unit; 0</=k</=1] (of the NGS-based SIQ-score in comparison to blood culture diagnostics, as the goldstandard for the identification of the causative pathogen in sepsis)
Measurement of the interobserver agreement between both items.
Time frame: 2 years
Plausibility [%] (of the NGS-based SIQ-score)
Using a majority rule, SIQ-score results will be evaluated for plausibility by a panel of three independent clinical specialists not associated with the study site. Therefore, the panel will be provided with clinical case summaries, NGS results and standard-of-care results from all samples tested. Results of microbiological routine diagnostics in specimens different from blood (e.g. body fluid, tissue, bronchoalveolar lavage, endotracheal aspirate) will be included when they have been obtained within a timeframe of ≤72 hours prior or after the timepoints for NGS-based measurements.
Time frame: 2,5 years
Changes in therapy [%] (that may have occurred if the NGS-based SIQ-score had been available for clinical use)
Using a majority rule, the clinical value of the NGS-based approach will be estimated by a panel of three independent clinical specialists not associated with the study site, retrospectively identifying potential changes in patients´ management based on NGS results. Therefore, the panel will be provided with clinical case summaries, NGS results and standard-of-care results from all samples tested. Results of microbiological routine diagnostics in specimens different from blood (e.g. body fluid, tissue, bronchoalveolar lavage, endotracheal aspirate) will be included when they have been obtained within a timeframe of ≤72 hours prior or after the timepoints for NGS-based measurements. To identify potential changes in antimicrobial management that may have occurred if the results from the NGS technology had been available for clinical use, the panel will be provided with a special questionnaire.
Time frame: 2,5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.