The purpose of the study is to evaluate the ability of subjects who are already prescribed Certolizumab Pergol therapy and have been self injecting with prefilled syringes for at least the previous three months, to safely and effectively self-inject Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) using the e-Device and to evaluate the post-use structural integrity of used devices and cassettes via visual examination.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
70
* Active Substance: Certolizumab Pegol * Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection * Route of administration: subcutaneous injection by e-Device
Ra0098 116
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Ra0098 107
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Ra0098 135
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Ra0098 119
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Ra0098 101
Covina, California, United States
Ra0098 131
Clermont, Florida, United States
Ra0098 132
Coral Springs, Florida, United States
Ra0098 127
Gainesville, Georgia, United States
Ra0098 122
Clive, Iowa, United States
Ra0098 105
St Louis, Missouri, United States
...and 12 more locations
Percentage of Subjects Able to Self-administer Safe and Effective Injections Using the e-Device at Visit 2
Safe and effective self-injection was evaluated by the healthcare provider and is defined as: * Dose Delivery: Subject self-injected the complete dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) as confirmed by a visual inspection of the CZP-cassette(s) which shows the pre-filled syringe container to be empty AND * No Adverse Events related to use of the e-Device (Adverse Device Effects) that would preclude continued use of the e-Device for self-injection. For subjects on the Q4W (every 4 weeks) dosing regimen who would self-inject twice (2×200 mg CZP) at each visit, each injection was evaluated for safety and effectiveness using the above criteria. The primary endpoint of safe and effective self-injection for subjects on the Q4W dosing regimen was met only if both self-injections were determined to be safe and effective.
Time frame: Visit 2 (Week 2 for Q2W; Week 4 for Q4W)
Percentage of Subjects Able to Self-administer Safe and Effective Injections Using the e-Device at Visit 1
Safe and effective self-injection was evaluated by the healthcare provider and is defined as: * Dose Delivery: Subject self-injected the complete dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) as confirmed by a visual inspection of the CZP-cassette(s) which shows the pre-filled syringe container to be empty AND * No Adverse Events related to use of the e-Device (Adverse Device Effects) that would preclude continued use of the e-Device for self-injection. For subjects on the Q4W (every 4 weeks) dosing regimen who would self-inject twice (2×200 mg CZP) at each visit, each injection was evaluated for safety and effectiveness using the above criteria. The primary endpoint of safe and effective self-injection for subjects on the Q4W dosing regimen was met only if both self-injections were determined to be safe and effective.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0)
Percentage of Used Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)-Cassettes Identified as Having Structural Integrity Issues Based on Visual Examination
CZP-cassettes identified as having structural integrity issues meant CZP-cassettes with clear evidence of damage/compromised structural integrity, not superficial cosmetic imperfections.
Time frame: During the study (from Week 0 up to Week 4)
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure
Blood pressure was measured in millimetre of mercury (mmHg).
Time frame: From Week 0 to Visit 2 (Week 2 for Q2W; Week 4 for Q4W)
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Blood pressure was measured in millimetre of mercury (mmHg).
Time frame: From Week 0 to Visit 2 (Week 2 for Q2W; Week 4 for Q4W)
Mean Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
Pulse Rate was measured in beats per minute (beats/min).
Time frame: From Week 0 to Visit 2 (Week 2 for Q2W; Week 4 for Q4W)
Mean Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
Respiratory Rate was measured in breaths per minute (breaths/min).
Time frame: From Week 0 to Visit 2 (Week 2 for Q2W; Week 4 for Q4W)
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Temperature
Body Temperature was measured in Grad Celsius (°C).
Time frame: From Week 0 to Visit 2 (Week 2 for Q2W; Week 4 for Q4W)
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) During the Study
An Adverse Event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of investigational medicinal product (IMP), whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Time frame: During the study (from Week 0 up to Week 5 +/-3 Days)
Incidence of Adverse Device Events (ADEs) During the Study
An Adverse Device Event (ADE) was an AE related to the use of an investigational device. An ADE must have met 1 or more of the following criteria: * Adverse event that resulted from insufficiencies or inadequacies in the Instructions for Use (IFU), the deployment, the implantation, the installation, the operation, or any malfunction of the investigational medical device * Adverse event that was a result of an error or intentional misuse.
Time frame: During the study (from Week 0 up to Week 5 +/-3 Days)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.