Evaluation of a Binaural Beamformer (StereoZoom) in a Virtual Acoustic Environment and in Real Life

Overview

The goal of the study is to determine the benefit in speech intelligibility of the BBF and the MBF compared to an omni-directional microphone in different noise conditions. Secondary objective is to determine if there is a subjective preference for one of the microphone settings in different noise conditions.

Study participants will be invited for two appointments. In the first appointment test will be performed inside the lab (lab measurements) and outside the lab (real life measurements) and in the second appointment test will be performed in the lab. In between appointments participants are asked to try the Naida CI Q90 at home and in their familiar surroundings for 2-4 weeks (home trial). Lab measurements: The Oldenburg Sentence Test will be used as speech signal to determine the speech reception threshold (SRT) for each background noise with an adaptive procedure. The overall level of the noise will be held constant while the level of the speech signal will be adapted depending on the words understood correctly for each sentence. In addition to the objective speech intelligibility measurements the three microphone settings will also be assessed subjectively. For each background noise scenario the Oldenburg sentences will be presented successively from the frontal loudspeaker. The experimenter will switch between two programs on the participant's processor who then compares the two different microphone settings of these programs. Three paired comparisons will be performed: omni-directional vs. MBF, omni-directional vs. BBF and MBF vs. BBF. The comparisons will be made with regards to speech intelligibility, noise suppression and overall preference in each situation. Real life measurements: Even though the results obtained in the lab present a good approximation to real-life performance both beam former options should also be tested outside the lab and in everyday life. In a guided tour the experimenter will take the study participant to noisy places in Zürich, if possible to the same or similar places in which the lab recordings were made. The same paired comparisons as in the lab will be performed with the experimenter talking to the participant or reading a story aloud. Home trial: Finally, the study participant should evaluate all three microphone settings for 2-4 weeks during activities in their familiar surroundings, i.e. having a conversation with one or more persons at home, in the tram, in a restaurant, attending a meeting at work, etc. Subjective feedback will be collected in a questionnaire. Instead of collecting subjective feedback in paper form the questions can be presented on a SmartPhone (Motorola Moto G) screen for those participants able to use a SmartPhone (Motorola Moto G). In that way the participant can answer the questions when he finds himself in a certain listening situation. Such a solution might be more comfortable than a paper questionnaire for some participants. An App for a mobile questionnaire called MobEval already exists from Phonak and will be used in this study. Participants will receive loaner SmartPhones (Motorola Moto G).

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes