In this 7-month randomized controlled trial, children aged 1 to less than 6 years, with recurrent asthma attacks triggered mostly by colds, will receive a high dose of vitamin D or a placebo every 3.5 months during their usual clinic visit, and a daily supplement of vitamin D or a placebo. This study will test whether children in vitamin D group have less frequent and less severe asthma exacerbations compared with those receiving placebo.The study will also document the safety profile of this strategy.
This is a multicenter triple-blind randomized parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial of vitamin D3 supplementation. Children aged 1-5 (\<6) years with physician-diagnosed asthma predominantly triggered by upper respiratory tract infections will be screened for enrolment in paediatric asthma, respiratory or allergy clinics and the ED departments and randomized between Sept 1 to January 31, annually (4 recruitment years) and year around from 2022 onwards. Using a computer-generated random list, stratified by site, children will be allocated (1:1) using permuted block randomisation method to enhance concealment. Children will be followed for 7 months, with 3 visits every 3.5 months with repeated urine (for calcium:creatinine ratio) and blood samples. In addition, ten (10) days after each bolus, urine will be sampled for urinary calcium:creatinine ratio. In case of elevated urine calcium:creatinine ratio, a blood sample may be needed primarily for markers of calcium metabolism and exploratory outcomes. Only patients enrolled at CHU Sainte-Justine and Montreal Children's Hospital will receive a systematic home visit 10 days after first bolus for both urine and blood samples. There will be 6 follow-up phone calls, at week 1 and then monthly, to inquire about exacerbations and URTIs, remind parents to complete questionnaires and to collect a nasal swab at each exacerbation and screen for adverse events. The main outcome is the number of courses of rescue oral corticosteroids (OCS) per child during the study period. Several secondary outcomes will be documented using biological samples and validated questionnaires to ascertain laboratory-confirmed respiratory infections, intensity and severity of exacerbations, mean number of ED visits, parents' functional status during exacerbations, de-intensification of preventive asthma therapy, cost effectiveness, and safety profile. A sample of 432 children (400+7,5% attrition) per arm will provide 80% power with a two-tailed alpha of 5% to detect a 25% relative reduction in the mean number of exacerbations requiring OCS per child. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis will be carried out with all randomised children.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
323
British Columbia Children's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Children's Hospital of London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Montreal Children's Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
CHU Sainte Justine
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
CHU de Québec-Université Laval
Québec, Quebec, Canada
CHU de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Number of asthma exacerbations per child treated with rescue oral corticosteroids
Group difference in the mean number of exacerbations treated with rescue oral corticosteroids/child
Time frame: 7 months
Laboratory-confirmed respiratory infections
Group difference in (i) mean number of laboratory-confirmed respiratory infections per child and (ii) distribution of viruses during colds and/or asthma exacerbations
Time frame: 7 months
Mean number of ED visits and hospital admissions for asthma exacerbations
Group difference in mean number of ED visits and hospital admissions for asthma exacerbations per child
Time frame: 7 months
De-intensification of preventive asthma therapy
Group difference in proportion of children with de-intensification of preventive asthma therapy
Time frame: 3.5 and 7 months
Duration of asthma symptoms during asthma exacerbations
Group difference in the mean duration of symptoms during asthma exacerbations per child (i) documented in writing on the validated 'Asthma Flare-up Diary for Young Children' and (ii) reported verbally by parents,
Time frame: 7 months
Duration of B2-agonist use during asthma exacerbations
Group difference in the mean duration of B2-agonist use during asthma exacerbations per child (i) documented in writing on the validated 'Asthma Flare-up Diary for Young Children' and (ii) reported verbally by parents,
Time frame: 7 months
Severity of asthma symptoms during asthma exacerbations
Group difference in the severity of symptoms during asthma exacerbations per child documented on the 'Asthma Flare-up Diary for Young Children'
Time frame: 7 months
Intensity of use of rescue β2-agonists during asthma exacerbations
Group difference in the mean cumulative use of rescue β2-agonists per child during exacerbations documented on the validated 'Asthma Flare-up Diary for Young Children'
Time frame: 7 months
Parents' functional status during asthma exacerbations
Group difference in the mean parents' functional status during asthma exacerbations per child as documented on the validated 'Effect of a child's asthma flare-up on parents questionnaire'
Time frame: 7 months
Number of parental workdays lost
Group difference in the cumulative number of days of work or regular planned activities missed by parents to care for their child during asthma exacerbations
Time frame: 7 months
Parental productivity
Group difference in the extent to which parents were able to perform their work or regular planned activities during their child's acute asthma exacerbation (%)
Time frame: 7 months
Intervention cost-effectiveness
Cost of intervention vs. cost (family expenses and health care) of exacerbations
Time frame: 7 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.