This study is a pragmatic open-label international randomized trial comparing therapeutic dose intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) to standard care venous thromboprophylaxis in patients diagnosed with septic shock.
Background and significance: Sepsis and septic shock account for 10% of admissions to the intensive care unit and constitute the second most frequent cause of death among admitted patients. The mortality rate associated with septic shock ranges from 30% to 50% and death is often due to multiple organ dysfunction coupled with systemic inflammation. Given the pathobiological relationship between coagulation and inflammation in sepsis, treatment with anticoagulants has been investigated in this population. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that heparin, a widely available, inexpensive anticoagulant, may improve clinical outcomes in sepsis, but high quality evidence to guide practice is lacking. Hypothesis: Intravenous (IV) unfractionated heparin (UFH) reduces mortality and morbidity when administered to patients with suspected septic shock. Study Design: A pragmatic open-label international randomized trial comparing therapeutic dose intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) to standard care venous thromboprophylaxis in patients diagnosed with septic shock. Setting: To increase the external validity/generalizability of the trial results, 20 sites in 4 countries will participate. Study Population: Patients with systemic inflammation, vasopressor dependent shock, and signs of organ dysfunction. Interventions: IV infusion of UFH at 18 IU/kg/hr, dosed according to total body weight and pragmatically adjusted according to usual care to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of 1.5-2.5x that of the reference aPTT value (approximately 59-99 seconds). Alternately, therapeutic anti-Xa values (ie. values typically targeted for the treatment of venous thromboembolism) can be targeted based on local practice. Duration of heparin infusion is for a maximum of 5 days (120 hours) or until death, ICU discharge or discontinuation of vasopressors. The dose of UFH has been informed by our observational study and meta-analysis that showed a benefit of UFH in patients receiving therapeutic doses. Control group: Local standard care for venous thromboprophylaxis (i.e. not therapeutic) which may include SC LMWH, SC UFH, sequential compression devices or graduated compression stockings. Outcomes: At the end of the HALO international phase II trial, an international DSMB will be presented with by-group efficacy (vasopressor-free days) data in the context of 90-day mortality, and safety (bleeding and transfusion). With these data the DSMB will suggest: a) terminating enrollment for futility (lack of efficacy) or harm, or b) continuing to the phase III trial along with a recommended sample size to detect a clinically relevant difference in 90-day mortality. Patients will be analyzed according to the treatment group to which they are allocated. By-group data will remain blinded to study investigators so that these patients may be included in the HALO international phase III RCT. Our analytic approach provides a rationale to either stop, or to justify further investment in a large international phase III trial.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
178
UFH initiated at 18 IU/kg/hr, dosed according to total body weight and pragmatically adjusted according to local institutional policy to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin (aPTT) of 1.5 to 2.5 times that of the reference aPTT value or anti-Xa values targeted to local practice levels. Duration of study intervention will be a maximum of 5 days (120 hours) or until vasopressors have been discontinued for 24 continuous hours. All participants will then receive venous thromboprophylaxis according to local practice.
May include subcutaneous heparin or dalteparin, sequential compression device or graduated compression stockings
Vasopressor-free days.
The goal of phase II trial is to provide the international Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) with a sensible estimate to justify continued enrollment in an adaptive (sample size) trial. Vasopressor use, reflecting cardiovascular collapse due to overwhelming systematic inflammation, is a key inclusion criterion for the trial and durable discontinuation of such drugs and meaningful clinical improvement. Vasopressor-free days has been recommended as a preferred clinical outcome in phase II trials in critical illness.
Time frame: 30 days
Clinical Outcome #1 - ICU mortality
Survival
Time frame: From date of randomization until the first documentation of death from any cause or ICU discharge date or 90 days, whichever came first
Clinical Outcome #2 - Hospital mortality
Survival
Time frame: From date of randomization to the first documentation of death from any cause or hospital discharge date or 90 days, whichever came first.
Clinical Outcome #3 - 90-day mortality
Survival
Time frame: Up to day 90
Clinical Outcome # 4 - ∆SOFA score (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment)
Organ failure assessment using the SOFA scoring tool
Time frame: Daily from randomization to ICU discharge or hospital discharge or time of death or to study day 9 if still in ICU or hospital.
Clinical Outcome # 5 - Hospital-free days to day 90
Hospital admission duration in the context of survival
Time frame: from hospital admission to hospital discharge or time of death to day 90
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Froedtert Hospital
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Hospital Sao Jose
Altamira, Brazil
Hospital Novo Atibaia
Atibaia, Brazil
Hospital de Amor (Barretos)
Barretos, Brazil
Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte
Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Hospital Tacchini
Bento Gonçalves, Brazil
Hospital de Brasília
Brasília, Brazil
Hospital Ortopedico e Medicina Especializada ltda. - HOME
Brasília, Brazil
Instituto de Cardiologia do Distrito Federal
Brasília, Brazil
Hospital Maternidade São José
Colatina, Brazil
...and 41 more locations
Clinical Outcome #6 - Renal replacement therapy-free days to day 28
Renal replacement therapy duration in the context of survival
Time frame: from start of renal replacement therapy to study day 28
Safety Outcome #1 - Major Bleeding
Rates of major bleeding using a validated bleeding assessment tool
Time frame: Assessed daily to day 8
Safety Outcome #2 - Minor Bleeding
Rates of minor bleeding using a validated bleeding assessment tool
Time frame: Assessed daily to day 8
Safety Outcome #3 - Suspected HIT (Heparin induced thrombocytopenia)
Incidence of any laboratory testing for HIT including screening or confirmatory tests
Time frame: Assessed daily to day 8
Safety Outcome #4 - Confirmed HIT (Heparin induced thrombocytopenia)
Postive confirmatory HIT test (one of Serotonin release assay (SRA) or Heparin induced platelet aggregation (HIPA))
Time frame: Assessed daily to day 8
Rate of enrolment
average number of patients enrolled per site per month
Time frame: Monthly starting at individual site initiation through to end of enrollment, estimated two years