Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versu Surgical Aortix Valve Replacement for Treating Elderly Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annuli: A Prospective Randomized Study The VIVA Trial

Overview

To date, no formal, randomized, prospective, head-to-head comparisons of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have been undertaken in the severe aortic stenosis (AS) population with small aortic annuli. Objectives of the present study are to compare the hemodynamic performance (incidence of severe PPM and ≥ moderate AR) and clinical outcomes (death, stroke, major or life threatening bleeding) between TAVR and SAVR in patients with severe AS and small aortic annuli.

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized open-label trial including patients with severe AS and small aortic annulus (mean aortic annuli diameter ˂23mm and minimal diameter ≤21.5mm, evaluated by 3D-CT or 3D-TEE). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either TAVR or SAVR. The TAVR procedure will be performed with the ACURATE neo Aortic Valve, the Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve (20, 23 or 26mm) or the CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO valve system (23 or 26 mm).New iterations of these valve models may also be included. The SAVR procedure will be performed using standard techniques, with no limitation in terms of type and size of the valve prosthesis or surgical procedure (e.g. enlargement of the aortic root). For both TAVR and SAVR, the choice of the type and size of valve, access route (for TAVR), utilization of additional procedures such as root enlargement will be left at the discretion of heart team of the site treating the patient.

Conditions