This phase II trial studies the side effects and how well azacitidine and enasidenib work in treating patients with IDH2-mutant myelodysplastic syndrome. Azacitidine and enasidenib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the safety and tolerability of enasidenib alone, and enasidenib in combination with azacitidine (AZA), for patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutated myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). II. To assess the efficacy of the combination of enasidenib + azacitidine in hypomethylating agent (HMA) naive subjects with IDH2-mutated MDS, and to assess the efficacy of enasidenib single-agent in subjects with IDH2-mutated MDS who are relapsed/refractory to HMA therapy. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate molecular and cellular markers that may be predictive of antitumor activity and/or resistance including evaluation of IDH2 variant allele fraction (VAF) levels during treatment and presence of co-occurring mutations. II. To assess overall survival, event-free survival and duration of response of enasidenib alone, and enasidenib in combination with azacitidine. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess changes in cellular differentiation and changes in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation profiles in IDH2-mutated MDS treated with enasidenib alone and with enasidenib + azacitidine. II. To evaluate quality of life (QOL) using an MDS-specific measure. OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients who are HMA-naive receive enasidenib orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-28 and azacitidine intravenously (IV) oveer 30-60 minutes or subcutaneously (SC) on days 1-7. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients relapsed and/or refractory to HMA therapy receive enasidenib PO QD on days 1-28. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for up to 3 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
63
Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGCleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGM D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
RECRUITINGIncidence of adverse events
Will use the Bayesian method by Thall, Simon and Estey for toxicity monitoring. For purpose of toxicity monitoring, toxicity is defined as any grade 3 or higher treatment related-toxicities by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Overall response rate
Defined as complete response (CR), partial response, and marrow CR assessed by International Working Group criteria. Will be estimated along with the 90% credible interval.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Event-free survival (EFS)
The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the probabilities of EFS. Log-rank tests will be used to compare among subgroups of patients in terms of EFS.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Overall survival (OS)
The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the probabilities of OS. Log-rank tests will be used to compare among subgroups of patients in terms of OS.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Anti-tumor activity
Will be summarized graphically and with descriptive statistics.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Pharmadynamics (PDn) markers
PDn markers will be summarized graphically and with descriptive statistics.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Drug exposure levels
Will be summarized graphically and with descriptive statistics.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.