There is evidence that CBT for insomnia (CBTi) is an effective treatment for sleep disturbance both as a primary problem and when co-morbid with other health problems, such as chronic pain. This study will investigate the effectiveness of CBTi as a treatment for tinnitus related insomnia. Tinnitus patients reporting clinically significant insomnia will be offered sleep-specific treatment. Six sessions of CBTi will be offered to one group of patients and 2 sessions standard audiological care (psycho-education and sleep hygiene) will be offered to another group. Both groups will be offered sound enrichment at night. In order to take account of the possible effects of clinical contact a third group will be offered 6 sessions of support without a focused tinnitus or sleep intervention. Accepted measures of sleep disturbance will be used as well as measures of tinnitus complaint. All treatment/contact will be provided at the Royal National Throat Nose \& Ear Hospital. Participants will be involved in the study (inc. baseline period {2 weeks}, intervention {8 weeks} and follow-ups {4 and 20 weeks}) for 34 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
Continuous maintenance of sleep diary, cognitive behaviour therapy, including cognitive restructuring, and behavioural change focusing on sleep restriction and safety behaviours.
Maintenance of sleep diary at key times. Psycho-education, provision of bedside sound generator.
Maintenance of sleep diary at key times. Social support focused on tinnitus and sleep problems.
Uclh (Rntneh)
London, United Kingdom
Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score
7-item questionnaire, each item rates 0 - 4. Total scores range from 0-28 with higher scores indicating more severity.
Time frame: At first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups
Change in the amount of sleep obtained
Average of all of the following metrics obtained from 2 weeks of sleep diary measure: Sleep Onset Latency - lower score indicates better sleep; Wake Time After Sleep Onset - lower score indicate better sleep; Number of night time awakenings - lower scores indicate better sleep; Total Sleep Time - higher scores indicate better sleep; Time in Bed - included only so that Sleep Efficiency can be calculated: Sleep Efficiency (Total Sleep Time / Time in Bed x 100) - higher scores indicate better sleep. Diary measures for sleep quality (0= worst possible to 10=best possible), tinnitus annoyance (0= not at all to 10= extremely), refreshed at waking (0= not at all to 10= very refreshed) and quality of day time functioning (0= very poor to 10= very good).
Time frame: A 2-week sleep diary will be kept 2 weeks prior to the first and last treatment sessions and to the 1 and 6 month follow-ups.
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score
10-item questionnaire. Sum of 7 components; global score range 0 - 21; higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Time frame: At first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups
Change in Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes About Sleep Questionnaire - abbreviated version (DBAS-16) score
16-item questionnaire scored on a 0-10 scale. The average score is calculated from all individual scores and ranges from 0-10; higher scores indicate more dysfunctional / unrealistic beliefs about / sleep.
Time frame: At first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups
Change in Tinnitus Catastrophizing Scale score
13-item questionnaire scored on a 0-4 scale. Total sum of scores range from 0 - 52. Higher scores indicate higher levels of catastrophizing.
Time frame: At first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups
Mini Tinnitus Questionnaire score
Construct: Tinnitus complaint 12-item questionnaire scored on a 0 - 2 scale. Total sum of scores range 0-24. Higher scores indicate presence of tinnitus. A score of 8 or more indicates the presence of a clinical level of tinnitus-related distress.
Time frame: Screening
Change in the Tinnitus Questionnaire score
Construct: Tinnitus complaint 41-item questionnaire scored on a 0 - 2 scale. Total sum of scores ranges from 0-82; higher scores indicate presence of tinnitus. The reliable change criterion is 11.08.
Time frame: At first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups
Change in subjective measure of tinnitus loudness
Visual Analogue Scale from 0mm to 100mm; higher scores indicate greater loudness of tinnitus.
Time frame: At first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups
Change in Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure score
Construct: general psychological distress 34-item questionnaire scored on a 0-4 scale. The average of all the scores is calculated and then multiplied by 10, so the scores can range from 0 to 40; a clinical cut-off score is 10 and clinically significant change is 5.
Time frame: At first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score
Construct: Depression 9-item questionnaire scored on a 0-3 scale; total sum of scores ranges from 0-27 with higher scores indicate greater depression severity.
Time frame: At first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment-7 score
7-items questionnaire scored on a 0-3 scale; total sum of scores ranges from total score range: 0-21 with higher score indicating more severe anxiety.
Time frame: At first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups
Change in EuroQOL score
Construct: health status (dimensions: mobility, self-care, performing usual activities, pain or discomfort; anxiety or depression); each state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code; The answers given to EQ-5D allow 243 unique health states to be identified and can be converted into EQ-5D index and utility scores anchored at 0 for death and 1 for perfect health. The EQ-5D questionnaire also includes a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), by which respondents can report their perceived health status with a grade ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).
Time frame: At first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups
Change in Work and Social Adjustment Scale score
Construct: impaired functioning 5-item questionnaire scored on a 0-8 scale; total sums of scores range from 0-40 with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment.
Time frame: At first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups
Satisfaction and feedback
Questionnaire asking individuals to rate the following on a 0 - 10 scale (from not at all to extremely) How useful was treatment? How relevant was treatment? How acceptable was treatment? They are also asked to provide qualitative feedback in the form of comments in response to questions about what changes they have noticed, what aspects of treatment were most and least useful, what they would have liked to be different and any other comments.
Time frame: At the end of treatment and at six month follow-up point
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.