The aim of this study is to assess feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of two VRET (Virtual Reality Exposition Therapy)session associated with either active anodal tDCS or sham tDCS on the ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decrease anxiety related to visual height intolerance
Subjects suffering from visual height intolerance are asked to go in 20 min as height as possible riding in two elevators of adjacents buildings separated by a board they have to cross at each stage. Inclusion visit: * Confirmation of eligibility criteria * Written informed consent * Completion of Acrophobia Questionnaire (AQ), Attitude towards Height Questionnaire (ATHQ), Height Interpretation Questionnaire (HIQ), Visual Height Intolerance scale(vHI), State-Trait Anxiety (STAI), Inventory and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) * Virtual task (10 minutes): riding in an elevator. At each level,subjects are asked to rate their Subjective Units Discomfort (SUD scale from 0 to 100). * Assessment of basal cortisol before beginning of exposure to virtual reality (sampling saliva through a Salivette®) * Pulse and blood pressure measurements before and after session Session 1 (within 1 to 7 days following Inclusion Visit) and session 2 (within 48 hours following session 1): * Randomization is made by the tDCS software (double bind). * Equipment of subject with Vive Headset (virtual reality HTC vive), trackers and (tDCS). The subject does not see the experimental room. * Virtual task (20 minutes): the subject has to ride in an elevator up to the next floor, cross a footbridge between 2 buildings to access the elevator on the other side and be able to climb to the next floor. At each level, the subject asked to rate their SUD. The objective is to climb as high as possible. * The active or sham brain stimulation is applied randomly during the entire virtual task. * Assessment of basal cortisol before and after exposure to virtual reality * Pulse and blood pressure measurements before and after session * After session: debriefing and explication of the subjective experience (30 minutes). End of study visit: * Identical to inclusion visit plus : * acrophobia/visual height * Completion of Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) and Igroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
28
Active Brain stimulation (tDCS) is applied during exposition to virtual reality (20 minutes)
Sham Brain stimulation (tDCS) is applied during exposition to virtual reality (20 minutes)
University Hospital
Nantes, France
Change in Subjective Units of Discomfort (SUD) at different heights
Measure by 0 to 100 scale (100 being the most intense fear) subjective units of discomfort of subjects at different heights (corresponding to virtual floor of a flat) and at each visit
Time frame: within 2 weeks
Change in composite score of Stress reactivity and intolerance of heights
Evaluated by psychometric questionnaires : Acrophobia Questionnaire (AQ), Attitude towards Height Questionnaire (ATHQ), Height Interpretation Questionnaire (HIQ), Visual Height Intolerance scale(vHI), State-Trait Anxiety (STAI), Inventory and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) The results of these questionnaires will be computed to obtain an overall assessment of the change in reactivity to stress. Comparison of results between the 2 arms
Time frame: within one week
Change in physiologic effects
Evaluation of physiologic effects by skin conductance, pulse, salivary cortisol level, eye-tracking. The results of these exams and measures will be computed to obtain an overall assessment of the change in physiologic effects at each visit
Time frame: within 2 weeks
Comparison in composite score of performance in virtual reality
Assessing the performances in virtual reality in both groups at inclusion and endpoints visits, evaluated by * height and number of floor achieved * rating of SUD at each floor * time spent at each floor * Differences in eye behavior (duration of fixations, saccade length ...) and in the deployment of visual attention
Time frame: within 2 weeks
Debriefing
Analysis after sessions of subjective experience and acceptability using explicationy interviews based on micro phenomenology Locating some recurrences and particularity in the phenomenological experience of patients according to the different experimental conditions.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: within one week
Quality of immersion
Measured by the score to the Igroup Presence Questionnaire
Time frame: at 2 weeks
virtual reality and tDCS tolerance
Measured by the Simulator sickness questionnaire
Time frame: at 2 weeks