The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of dexmedetomidine on swallowing function in healthy volunteers using combined pressure and impedance recordings. Furthermore, two different concentrations of dexmedetomidine will be studied to find out whether any posible impact of dexmedetomidine on swallowing function is dose-dependent.
Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is commonly applied in modern perioperative care and means that minor surgical procedures are accomplished in awake patients using local anesthesia and light sedation. MAC has many advantages compared to general anesthesia; the recovery time after anesthesia is shorter and risk for postoperative nausea is lower to mention some. However, the patient is spontaneously breathing and the airway is not protected by an endotracheal tube which potentially increases risk of pulmonary aspiration. Pulmonary aspiration, that is inhalation of stomach and/or pharyngeal contents into the lungs, is a severe anesthesia-related complication and can in worst case lead to pneumonia and even death. Intact swallowing function is crucial in avoiding aspiration and how sedatives and analgesic agents used during MAC influence swallowing function is not fully understood. Pharyngeal function during bolus swallowing is measured by combined high resolution impedance manometry (HRIM). The HRIM catheter is inserted through the nose in such a way that sensors straddle the entire pharynx and esophagus with the distal catheter tip in the stomach. Dynamic pressure changes and flow can be detected during swallowing and data registered by HRIM are analysed using purpose-designed software, AIM analysis (automated impedance manometry analysis). AIM analysis derives pressure flow variables which describe different physiological events like bolus timing and bolus distension in the pharynx and the esophagus during swallowing. A Swallow Risk Index value, quantifying risk of deglutitive aspiration, can also be defined. The aim of the study is to evaluate impact of dexmedetomidine on swallowing function in healthy volunteers.Dexmedetomidine is a selective alfa-agonist frequently used during MAC. Furthermore, two different concentrations of dexmedetomidine will be studied to find out whether any posible impact of dexmedetomidine on swallowing function is dose-dependent. Moreover, subjective swallowing difficulties will be assessed. 20 healthy volunteers will be studied on two different occasions approximately one week apart. In a randomized order volunteers will receive intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine in two subsequent concentrations and placebo (normal saline) infusion in corresponding doses on the other occasion. Blood samples are obtained for plasma concentration determination of the study drug and sedation levels are assessed during study drug exposure.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
20
Placebo (NaCl 0.9%) TCI infusion
Dexmedetomidine TCI 0.6 ng/ml and 1.2 ng/ml
Swallow Risk Index, dex vs baseline
Global measure of swallowing dysfunction related to aspiration risk, during swallowing between dexmedetomidine exposure and baseline compared to placebo.
Time frame: 60 minutes
Hypopharyngeal Intrabolus Pressure, dex vs baseline
Measure of pharyngeal outflow resistance, mmHg
Time frame: 60 min
Mean Distension Contraction Latency, dex vs baseline
Measure of flow timing, sec
Time frame: 60 min
Hypopharyngeal Bolus Presence Time, dex vs baseline
Measure of bolus arrival/oral bolus control, sec
Time frame: 60 min
Velopharyngeal to Tongue Base Pressure Integral, dex vs baseline
Measure of lumen occlusive pressure, mmHgxsxcm
Time frame: 60 min
Hypopharyngeal Contractile Integral, dex vs baseline
Measure of lumen occlusive pressure, mmHgxsxcm
Time frame: 60 min
Mean Pharyngeal Peak Pressure, dex vs baseline
Measure of lumen occlusive pressure, mmHg
Time frame: 60 min
Mean UES Basal Pressure, dex vs baseline
Measure of UES (upper esophageal sphincter) basal tone, mmHg
Time frame: 60 min
UES Open Time, dex vs baseline
Measure of UES opening, sec
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 60 min
UES Maximum Admittance
Measure of UES opening, ms
Time frame: 60 min
UES Integrated Relaxation Pressure
Measure of UES relaxation, mmHg
Time frame: 60 min
Pharyngeal Pressure Flow variables, dex 0.6 ng/ml vs 1.2 ng/ml
Difference in pressure flow variables during swallowing between dexmedetomidine target concentration of 0.6 ng/ml and 1.2 ng/ml compared to placebo.
Time frame: 60 minutes
Esophageal pressure flow variables, dex vs baseline
Difference in pressure flow variables during swallowing between dexmedetomidine exposure and baseline compared to placebo.
Time frame: 60 min
Esophageal pressure flow variables, dex 0.6 ng/ml vs 1.2 ng/ml
Difference in esophageal pressure flow variables during swallowing between dexmedetomidine target concentration of 0.6 ng/ml and 1.2 ng/ml compared to placebo.
Time frame: 60 min
Subjective swallowing difficulties
Difference in subjective swallowing difficulties between dexmedetomidine exposure and baseline compared to placebo.
Time frame: 60 minutes