The goal of this clinical study is to assess whether axicabtagene ciloleucel therapy improves the clinical outcome compared with standard of care second-line therapy in participants with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
After completing the treatment period, all participants will be followed in the post-treatment follow-up period for up to 5 years. Thereafter, participants who received at least one dose of axicabtagene ciloleucel as protocol therapy will transition to a separate long term follow up (LTFU) study and complete the remainder of the 15-year follow-up assessments within KT-US-982-5968 (NCT05041309).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
359
Administered intravenously
Platinum-containing salvage chemotherapy (Rituximab-ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide (R-ICE), Rituximab-dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin,oxaliplatin (R-DHAP), Rituximab-etoposide, methylprednisolone, cisplatin, cytarabine (R-ESHAP), or Rituximab-gemcitabine, dexamethasone, cisplatin/carboplatin (R-GDP) as selected by treating investigator).
Administered intravenously
Event Free Survival (EFS) Per Blinded Central Assessment
EFS:Time from randomization to disease progression (PD), best response of stable disease (SD) up to Day 150, start of new anti-lymphoma therapy including stem cell transplant, or death from any cause. PD=Score 4 (uptake moderately \> liver) or 5 (uptake markedly \> liver and/or new lesions) with increased uptake from baseline; New fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather than another etiology or in bone marrow; Individual node/lesion abnormal with longest diameter \> 1.5 cm, ≥ 50% increase from nadir; Splenic length increase \> 50% of prior increase beyond baseline or ≥ 2 cm increase if no prior splenomegaly; New/recurrent splenomegaly, progression of non-measurable lesions, new lesion, or new/recurrent bone marrow involvement. KM estimates was used for analysis.
Time frame: From randomization date up to a median follow-up: 24.9 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Blinded Central Assessment
ORR: Percentage of participants with CR (Complete Metabolic Response (CMR);Complete Radiologic Response (CRR)) or PR (partial metabolic response (PMR); partial radiologic response (PRR)).CMR: Positron emission tomography (PET) 5-point scale scores: 1-No uptake above background; 2-Uptake ≤mediastinum; 3-Uptake \>mediastinum but ≤liver, with/without residual mass; no new lesions, no FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. CRR: Target nodes/nodal masses regressed ≤1.5 cm in longest diameter, no extralymphatic sites, no non-measured lesions, normal organ size, no new sites, normal bone marrow morphology. PMR: Scores 4 (uptake moderately \>liver), 5 (uptake markedly \>liver, new lesions) with reduced uptake from baseline and residual mass, no new lesions. Responding at interim/residual disease at end of treatment. PRR: ≥50% decrease in sum of diameters of up to 6 target measurable lesions, no increase in non-measured lesions, spleen length decreased \>50% if previously enlarged, no new lesion sites.
Time frame: From randomization date up to a median follow-up: 24.9 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates were used for analysis.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Administered intravenously
Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
Mayo Clinic Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, United States
UCLA
Santa Monica, California, United States
Stanford Cancer Institute
Stanford, California, United States
University of Miami Hospital and Clinics/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
Miami, Florida, United States
Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinincs
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
...and 62 more locations
Time frame: Up to 74.9 months
Duration of Response (DOR) Per Blinded Central Assessments
DOR was defined only for participants who experience an objective response after axicabtagene ciloleucel infusion and was the time from the first objective response per Lugano classification to disease progression or death from any cause. Objective response was defined in outcome measure 2 and disease progression was defined in outcome measure 1. KM estimates were used for analysis.
Time frame: From the date of first confirmed objective response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death regardless of cause (Up to 37.8 months)
Modified Event Free Survival (mEFS) Per Blinded Central Assessment
Modified event free survival is defined the same way as EFS, except that a best response of SD up to and including Day 150 assessment post randomization was not considered an event. KM estimates were used for analysis.
Time frame: From randomization date up to a median follow-up: 24.9 months
EFS Per Investigator Disease Assessments
EFS was defined as the time from randomization to the earliest date of disease progression per the Lugano Classification, best response of stable disease (SD) up to and including Day 150, commencement of new lymphoma therapy, or death from any cause. Disease progression is defined in outcome measure 1.
Time frame: From randomization date up to a median follow-up: 47.2 months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Investigator Disease Assessments
PFS is defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of disease progression per Lugano classification or death from any cause. Disease progression is defined in outcome measure 1. KM estimates were used for analysis.
Time frame: From randomization date up to a median follow-up: 47.2 months
Modified Event Free Survival (mEFS) Per Investigator Assessment
mEFS is defined the same way as EFS, except that a best response of SD up to and including Day 150 assessment post randomization was not considered an event. KM estimates were used for analysis.
Time frame: From randomization date up to a median follow-up: 47.2 months
Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Scores
Global health status was measured using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality Life Questionnaire (QLQ) C-30. This health related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire was comprised of 15 questions on functional scales, 13 questions on symptom scales and 2 on global health status scale. Global Health Status used a 7 point Likert-type scale of 1 (Very poor) to 7 (Excellent). All scores were transformed to 0-100. Higher scores for Global Health Status indicated better HRQoL.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 50, 100, and 150; Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of global health status/QoL scale; five functional domains (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social); three symptom domains (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain); and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The Physical Functioning domain includes 5 questions in which participants were asked to rate their overall health and overall quality of life as it relates to physical functioning during the past week on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). The 5 scores were transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, where a high score indicated better QoL. A positive change from baseline indicates better QoL.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 50, 100, 150, Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Changes From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Five Levels Scale Index Score
The Euro-QOL (EQ) Five Dimensions (5D) Five Levels (5L), EQ-5D-5L questionnaire was a generic measure of health status that provided a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The EQ-5D-5L comprised 2 components: a questionnaire covering 5 dimensions and a tariff of values based upon direct valuations of health stated using a visual analog scale (VAS). The total score for EQ-5D-5L index was presented on a range from 0 to 1 where higher scores indicated better outcome. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 50, 100, 150; Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Scale Score
The EQ-5D-5L VAS is a 20-cm VAS for recording self-rated current HRQoL state and is used to describe the participants' health status on the day of the assessment. The EQ-5D-5L VAS score is recorded by each participant for his or her current HRQoL state and scored 0 ("the worst health you can imagine") to 100 ("the best health you can imagine"). The value 100 indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 50, 100, 150; Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Number of Participants With Post-dose Anti-Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Antibodies
Time frame: Up to 74.9 months
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
A TEAE was defined as any AE that begins on or after the first dose of study treatment (axicabtagene ciloleucel infusion or SOC), excluding bridging therapy.
Time frame: From first dose up to 61.8 months
Percentage of Participants With Increase in Laboratory Values Reported as Grade 3 or Higher
Grading categories were determined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe or medically significant, Grade 4: life-threatening. Percentages were rounded off.
Time frame: From first dose up to 61.8 months
Percentage of Participants With Decrease in Laboratory Values Reported as Grade 3 or Higher
Grading categories were determined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe or medically significant, Grade 4: life-threatening. Percentages were rounded off.
Time frame: From first dose up to 61.8 months