The objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-06651600 (200 mg for 8 weeks followed by 50 mg for 4 weeks) dosed once daily and PF-06700841 (60 mg for 12 weeks) dosed once daily during an induction period of 12 weeks, followed by an open label extension period at doses of 50 mg and 30 mg of PF 06651600 and PF 06700841, respectively, for 52 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
244
12 weeks, followed by PF-06651600, 50 mg once daily (QD) for 52 weeks
200 mg QD for 8 weeks, followed by 50 mg QD up to 56 weeks
12 weeks, followed by PF-06700841, 30 mg QD for 52 weeks
Percentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES CD50) at Week 12: Induction Period
SES CD50 was defined as 50% improvement from baseline in SES-CD. Baseline was defined as last measurement prior to first dosing on Day 1. Following bowel segments were used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum, right colon(C), transverse C, left C and rectum. Each segment assessed for four domains: presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing, each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, higher scores indicated more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score: 0=none, 1=small ulcer: (0.1-0.5 centimeter\[cm\]), 2=Large ulcer(0.5-2 cm), 3=very large ulcer(\>2 cm); ulcerated surface score: 0=none, 1=\<10%, 2=10-30% and 3=\>30%; affected surface score: 0=unaffected segment, 1=\<50%, 2=50-75% and 3=\>75%; presence of narrowing score: 0=none,1=single, can be passed, 2=multiple, can be passed and 3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score was determined by sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments and ranged from 0 to 60, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities During OLE Period
Pre-specified criteria for lab abnormalities included- hematology: hemoglobin(Hb), erythrocytes (ery),hematocrit:\<0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN);reticulocytes: \<0.5\*LLN, \>1.5\*upper limit of normal(ULN); ery mean corpuscular(EMC) volume: \<0.9\*ULN, \>1.11\*ULN;EMC Hb: \<0.9\*LLN; platelets:\>1.75\*ULN; leukocytes(10\^9/L): \<0.6\*LLN,\>1.5\*ULN;lymphocyte,neutrophil(10\^9/L):\<0.8\*LLN,\>1.2\*ULN;basophil,eosinophil,monocyte(10\^9/L):\>1.2\*ULN;activated partial thromboplastin time (sec): \>1.1\*ULN. Chemistry: bilirubin(mg/dL),aspartate aminotransferase(AT),alanine AT(units per litre)\>3.0\*ULN; protein, albumin(g/dL):\<0.8\*LLN; creatinine, triglycerides (mg/dL):\>1.3\*ULN; urate(mg/dL):\>1.2\*ULN, potassium (mEq/L):\<0.9\*LLN; calcium (mg/dL): \<0.9\*LLN,\>1.1\*ULN. Urinalysis: pH\>8;urine,glucose,protein(mg/dl); ketones, nitrite, urine Hb(scalar):\>=1. Number of participants with any lab abnormality meeting pre-specified criteria are reported.
Time frame: From start of study intervention in OLE period up to 4 weeks after last dose of study intervention (up to 56 weeks)
Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs During OLE Period
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
60 mg QD for 12 weeks followed by 30 mg QD for up to 52 weeks
Dothan Surgery Center
Dothan, Alabama, United States
Gut P.C., dba Digestive Health Specialists of the Southeast
Dothan, Alabama, United States
Brighton Surgical Center
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Entertainment Medical Group
Los Angeles, California, United States
Gastrointestinal Biosciences Clinical Trials, LLC
Los Angeles, California, United States
Stanford Medicine Outpatient Center - Digestive Health Center
Redwood City, California, United States
Front Range Endoscopy Center
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Peak Gastroenterology Associates
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Gastro Florida
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Gastro Florida
Clearwater, Florida, United States
...and 185 more locations
Vital signs including blood pressure (diastolic blood pressure \[DBP\], systolic blood pressure \[SBP\], and pulse rate \[PR\]) were measured in a supine position using automated devices. DBP included value \< 50 (millimeter of mercury \[mmHg\]), change \>=20 (mmHg) increase and change \>=20 (mmHg) decrease; SBP: value \< 90 (mmHg), change \>= 30 (mmHg) increase and change \>= 30 (mmHg) decrease; PR: value \> 120 (beats per minute \[bpm\]).
Time frame: From start of study intervention in OLE period up to 4 weeks after last dose of study intervention (up to 56 weeks)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings During OLE Period
Single twelve lead ECGs were obtained using an automated ECG machine after participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. QTc prolongations were defined as a QTc \>=480 milli second (msec) or an absolute change in QTc greater than (\>) 60 msec. Clinically significant ECG findings were determined by the investigator.
Time frame: From start of study intervention in OLE period up to 4 weeks after last dose of study intervention (up to 56 weeks)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During OLE Period
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a study intervention; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An AE was considered TEAE to a given treatment if the event started during the effective duration of treatment regardless of whether a similar event of equal or greater severity existed in the baseline period.
Time frame: From start of study intervention in OLE period up to 4 weeks after last dose of study intervention (up to 56 weeks)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE) During OLE Period
A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions) or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or was considered an important medical event. An SAE was considered as TESAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment regardless of whether a similar event of equal or greater severity existed in the baseline period.
Time frame: From start of study intervention in OLE period up to 4 weeks after last dose of study intervention (up to 56 weeks)
Number of Participants With Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events During OLE Period
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a study intervention; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Discontinuations from study due to TEAEs were defined as participants with an AE record indicating the AE caused permanent discontinuation from the study but action taken with study treatment was not drug withdrawn. Permanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs were defined as participants with an AE record indicating that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn. In this outcome measure number of participants with discontinuation from study due to AEs and permanent discontinuation from study intervention due to AEs are reported.
Time frame: From start of study intervention in OLE period up to 4 weeks after last dose of study intervention (up to 56 weeks)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities During Induction Period
Pre-specified criteria for lab abnormalities included- hematology: hemoglobin, erythrocytes, hematocrit:\<0.8\*LLN; reticulocytes: \<0.5\*LLN, \>1.5\*ULN; EMC volume: \<0.9\*ULN, \>1.11\*ULN;EMC Hb: \<0.9\*LLN; platelets:\>1.75\*ULN; leukocytes(10\^9/L): \<0.6\*LLN, \>1.5\*ULN; lymphocyte, neutrophil(10\^9/L):\<0.8\*LLN, \>1.2\*ULN; basophil, eosinophil, monocyte(10\^9/L):\>1.2\*ULN; activated partial thromboplastin time (sec): \>1.1\*ULN. Chemistry: bilirubin(mg/dL),aspartate aminotransferase(AT),alanine AT(units per litre)\>3.0\*ULN; protein, albumin(g/dL):\<0.8\*LLN; creatinine, triglycerides (mg/dL):\>1.3\*ULN; urate(mg/dL):\>1.2\*ULN, potassium (mEq/L):\<0.9\*LLN; calcium (mg/dL): \<0.9\*LLN,\>1.1\*ULN. Urinalysis: pH\>8; urine, glucose, protein(mg/dl); ketones, nitrite, urine Hb(scalar):\>=1. Number of participants with any lab abnormality meeting pre-specified criteria are reported.
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs During Induction Period
Vital signs including blood pressure (diastolic blood pressure \[DBP\], systolic blood pressure \[SBP\], and pulse rate \[PR\]) were measured in a supine position using automated devices. DBP included value \< 50 (mmHg), change \>=20 (mmHg) increase and change \>=20 (mmHg) decrease; SBP: value \< 90 (mmHg), change \>= 30 (mmHg) increase and PR: value \> 120 (bpm).
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings During Induction Period
Single twelve lead ECGs were obtained using an automated ECG machine after participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. QTc prolongations were defined as a QTc greater than or equal to (\>=)480 milli second (msec) or an absolute change in QTc greater than (\>)60 msec. Clinically significant ECG findings were determined by the investigator.
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Induction Period
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a study intervention; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An AE was considered TEAE to a given treatment if the event started during the effective duration of treatment regardless of whether a similar event of equal or greater severity existed in the baseline period.
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE) During Induction Period
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions) or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or was considered an important medical event. An SAE was considered as TESAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment regardless of whether a similar event of equal or greater severity existed in the baseline period.
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
Number of Participants Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events During Induction Period
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a study intervention; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Discontinuations from study due to TEAEs were defined as participants with an AE record indicating the AE caused permanent discontinuation from the study but action taken with study treatment was not drug withdrawn. Permanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs were defined as participants with an AE record indicating that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn. In this outcome measure number of participants with discontinuation from study due to AEs and permanent discontinuation from study intervention due to AEs are reported.
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Serious Infections During Induction Period
Participants were monitored for development of any infection (viral, bacterial and fungal). Serious infections were treated infections that required parenteral antimicrobial therapy and were present with positive pre-treatment culture and required hospitalization for treatment/met other criteria that required the infection to be classified as SAE. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity/results in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treated infections were infections that required antimicrobial therapy by any route of administration/required any surgical intervention (e.g., incision and drainage).
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful Endoscopic Improvement (CMEI) (Reduction of >=3 Points From Baseline in SES-CD Score) at Week 12: Induction Period
CMEI was defined as reduction of \>=3 points from baseline in SES-CD score as assessed by centrally read SES-CD score. Baseline: last measurement prior to first dosing on Day1. Following bowel segments were used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum, right C, transverse C, left C and rectum. Each segment assessed for 4 domains: presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing, each scored on scale of 0-3, higher scores indicated more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score: 0=none,1=small ulcer: (0.1-0.5cm),2=Large ulcer(0.5-2cm),3=very large ulcer(\>2cm); ulcerated surface score: 0=none,1=\<10%,2=10-30% and 3=\>30%; affected surface score: 0=unaffected segment, 1=\<50%, 2=50-75% and 3=\>75%; presence of narrowing score: 0=none,1=single, can be passed, 2=multiple, can be passed and 3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score was determined by sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments and ranged from 0 to 60, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in SES-CD Score at Week 12: Induction Period
Mean change from baseline in SES-CD score at Week 12 analyzed using analysis of covariance(ANCOVA)model with treatment,baseline disease activity/extent as factors, baseline SES CD score as covariate. Baseline=last measurement prior to first dosing on Day 1. Following bowel segments used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum,right C,transverse C,left C,rectum. Each segment assessed for four domains:presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface,presence of narrowing, each score on a scale of 0-3,higher scores=more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score:0=none,1=small ulcer:(0.1-0.5cm),2=large ulcer(0.5-2cm),3=very large ulcer(\>2 cm);ulcerated surface score:0=none,1=\<10%,2=10-30%,3=\>30%;affected surface score:0=unaffected segment,1=\<50%, 2=50-75%,3=\>75%;presence of narrowing score:0=none,1=single,can be passed,2=multiple can be passed,3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score=sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments,range from 0 to 60,higher score =more severe disease.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving >=25% Reduction in SES-CD From Baseline (SES-CD 25) at Week 12: Induction Period
SES CD25 was defined as \>=25% improvement from baseline in SES CD. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing on Day 1. Following bowel segments were used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum, right C, transverse C, left C and rectum. Each segment assessed for four domains: presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing, each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, higher scores indicated more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score: 0=none, 1=small ulcer: (0.1-0.5 centimeter\[cm\]), 2=Large ulcer(0.5-2 cm), 3=very large ulcer(\>2 cm); ulcerated surface score: 0=none, 1=\<10%, 2=10-30% and 3=\>30%; affected surface score: 0=unaffected segment, 1=\<50%, 2=50-75% and 3=\>75%; presence of narrowing score: 0=none,1=single, can be passed, 2=multiple, can be passed and 3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score was determined by sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments and ranged from 0 to 60, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission (SES-CD Score of <= 2) at Week 12: Induction Period
Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD score of \<= 2. Following bowel segments were used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum, right colon(C), transverse C, left C and rectum. Each segment assessed for four domains: presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing, each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, higher scores indicated more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score: 0=none, 1=small ulcer: (0.1-0.5 centimeter\[cm\]), 2=Large ulcer(0.5-2 cm), 3=very large ulcer(\>2 cm); ulcerated surface score: 0=none, 1=\<10%, 2=10-30% and 3=\>30%; affected surface score: 0=unaffected segment, 1=\<50%, 2=50-75% and 3=\>75%; presence of narrowing score: 0=none,1=single, can be passed, 2=multiple, can be passed and 3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score was determined by sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments and ranged from 0 to 60, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Mucosal Healing at Week 12: Induction Period
Mucosal healing was defined as complete absence of ulcers.
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving CMEI at Week 64 Among Participants Who Achieved CMEI Response at Week 12 (Baseline of OLE Period): OLE Period
CMEI was defined as reduction of \>=3 points from baseline as assessed by centrally read SES CD score. Baseline: last measurement prior to first dosing on Day 1 of Week 12. Following bowel segments were used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum, right C, transverse C, left C and rectum. Each segment assessed for four domains: presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing, each scored on scale of 0-3, higher scores indicated more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score: 0=none,1=small ulcer: (0.1-0.5 cm),2=Large ulcer(0.5-2 cm),3=very large ulcer(\>2 cm); ulcerated surface score: 0=none,1=\<10%, 2=10-30% and 3=\>30%; affected surface score: 0=unaffected segment, 1=\<50%, 2=50-75% and 3=\>75%; presence of narrowing score: 0=none,1=single, can be passed, 2=multiple, can be passed and 3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score was determined by sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments and ranged from 0-60, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 64 (Week 52 of OLE period)
Percentage of Participants Achieving SES CD 25 and SES CD 50 at Week 64 Among Participants Who Achieved SES CD 25 and SES CD 50 at Week 12 (Baseline of OLE Period): OLE Period
SES CD50 and SES CD25: 50% and 25% improvement from baseline, respectively. Baseline: last measurement prior to first dosing on Day 1 of Week 12. Following bowel segments were used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum, right C, transverse C, left C and rectum. Each segment assessed for four domains: presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing, each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, higher scores indicated more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score: 0=none, 1=small ulcer: (0.1-0.5 cm), 2=Large ulcer(0.5-2 cm), 3=very large ulcer(\>2 cm); ulcerated surface score: 0=none, 1=\<10%, 2=10-30% and 3=\>30%; affected surface score: 0=unaffected segment, 1=\<50%, 2=50-75% and 3=\>75%; presence of narrowing score: 0=none,1=single, can be passed, 2=multiple, can be passed and 3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score was determined by sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments and ranged from 0 to 60, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 64 (Week 52 of OLE period)