The objective of this prospective, multi-center, single arm study is to obtain further data on the safety and performance of the StellarexTM 0.014" OTW Drug-coated Angioplasty Balloon in the treatment of lesions in "below the knee" popliteal (P3 segment) and infra-popliteal arteries according to the Instructions for Use in Rutherford-Becker Classification (RCC) 3, 4 and 5 patient populations. This study will be conducted in Europe across up to 10 centers in up to 75 subjects. Office visits will occur at 30 days, 6, 12, and 24 months post-index procedure.
There is a significant amount of evidence that the use of Paclitaxel-coated balloons in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has demonstrated favorable outcomes when used to treat lesions in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. For subjects with lesions in the infrapopliteal arteries, which includes lesions in the mid to distal popliteal artery and below, a smaller profile balloon is necessary. Typically, lesions in the SFA and proximal popliteal arteries are treated by larger diameter balloons and larger sized guidewires (most commonly 0.018" or 0.035") which are too large for vessels below-the-knee. For this reason, the Stellarex™ 0.014" OTW Drug-coated Angioplasty Balloon was developed as a line extension to the Stellarex™ 0.035" device in order to accommodate the treatment of these smaller vessels. The Stellarex™ 0.014" balloon has the same drug concentration and is manufactured using a similar method as the Stellarex™ 0.035" device. Additionally, the Stellarex™ 0.035" and 0.014" balloon share a common balloon diameter of 4 mm, a size which was used to treat lesions throughout the popliteal artery in the previous Stellarex 0.035" studies. For the reasons noted above, equivalence between the two devices has been demonstrated. Furthermore, it is believed that the 0.014" device will not demonstrate any performance differences nor change the anticipated or residual risks. In conclusion, the current study has been developed in agreement with post-market requirements as per the Post Market Clinical Follow up (PMCF) plan. The prospective design of the study, the sample size and the selected outcomes will be able to provide the additional clinical information to support the safe use and performance of the Stellarex 0.014" device in the intended population of patients with below-the-knee arterial disease.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
The Stellarex balloon (0.014") is indicated for the treatment of de-novo or re-stenotic lesions in the lower extremities to establish blood flow and to maintain vessel patency.
Cardiologisches Centrum Bethanien
Frankfurt, Germany
Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH
Hamburg, Germany
Klinik Immenstadt, Herz und GefaSzentrum Immenstadt
Immenstadt im Allgäu, Germany
Universitatsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz
Primary Safety Endpoint-Composite Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE) + perioperative death (POD); the composite is the number of participants who do not have MALE or POD at 30 days
Major Adverse Limb Event (MALE) is defined as the composite of either major amputation or major re-intervention through 30 days of the index procedure. Major re-intervention is defined as creation of a new surgical bypass graft, the use of thrombectomy or thrombolysis or a major surgical graft revision such as a jump graft or an interposition graft. This is a single endpoint as it is a composite only subjects who do not have MALE or POD will be counted toward this endpoint MALE is defined as the composite of either major amputation or major re-intervention through 30 days of the index procedure. Major re-intervention is defined as creation of a new surgical bypass graft, the use of thrombectomy or thrombolysis or a major surgical graft revision such as a jump graft or an interposition graft. POD is all-cause death through 30 days of the index procedure.
Time frame: 30 days
Primary Performance Endpoint-Composite patency + limb salvage through 6 months; the composite is the number of participants with patency and limb salvage at 6 months
Patency defined as freedom from occluded target lesions (flow/no flow) verified by duplex ultrasound and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) Freedom from major amputation in the Target Limb This is a single endpoint as only subjects with both patency and limb salvage will be considered for this endpoint.
Time frame: 6 months
Major adverse event (MAE) rate at 6,12, and 24 months post index procedure
Defined as a composite rate of all-cause death, target limb major amputation and CD-TLR
Time frame: 6 Months
Major adverse event (MAE) rate at 6,12, and 24 months post index procedure
Defined as a composite rate of all-cause death, target limb major amputation and CD-TLR
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
49
Mainz, Germany
RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim
Rosenheim, Germany
Albert Schweitzer Hospital
Dordrecht, Netherlands
St. Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Cambridge University Hospital
Cambridge, United Kingdom
Guys and St. Thomas Hospital
London, United Kingdom
The Royal Free Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Time frame: 12 months
Major adverse event (MAE) rate at 6,12, and 24 months post index procedure
Defined as a composite rate of all-cause death, target limb major amputation and CD-TLR
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of CD-TLR at 6, 12 and 24 months
Rate of CD-TLR
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of CD-TLR at 6, 12 and 24 months
Rate of CD-TLR
Time frame: 12 months
Rate of CD-TLR at 6, 12 and 24 months
Rate of CD-TLR
Time frame: 24 months
Patency rate at 6, 12 and 24 months, defined as the presence of target lesion flow (absence of occlusion or no flow) as determined by Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) and freedom from CD-TLR
Patency rate
Time frame: 6 months
Patency rate at 6, 12 and 24 months, defined as the presence of target lesion flow (absence of occlusion or no flow) as determined by Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) and freedom from CD-TLR
Patency rate
Time frame: 12 months
Patency rate at 6, 12 and 24 months, defined as the presence of target lesion flow (absence of occlusion or no flow) as determined by Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) and freedom from CD-TLR
Patency rate
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of procedural complications defined as occurrence of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, emergent surgical revascularization, significant distal embolization in target limb, or thrombosis of target vessel through the end of the procedure
Rate of procedural complications
Time frame: through study completion, approximately 5 years
Rate of device or procedure related death at 30 days
Rate of device or procedure related death
Time frame: 30 days
Rate of major target limb amputation at 6 months post-procedure
Rate of major target limb amputation
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of major target limb amputation at 12 months post-procedure
Rate of major target limb amputation
Time frame: 12 months
Rate of major target limb amputation at 24 months post-procedure
Rate of major target limb amputation
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of clinically driven target vessel revascularization through 6 months
Rate of clinically driven target vessel revascularization
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of clinically driven target vessel revascularization through 12 months
Rate of clinically driven target vessel revascularization
Time frame: 12 months
Rate of clinically driven target vessel revascularization through 24 months
Rate of clinically driven target vessel revascularization
Time frame: 24 months
Lesion success:
Achievement of a final in-lesion residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (as determined by the angiographic core laboratory), using allowed pretreatment devices after guidewire passage through the lesion
Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 5 years
Technical success:
Achievement of a final in-lesion residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (as determined by the angiographic core laboratory), using the Stellarex 0.014" Drug-Coated Balloon without a device malfunction after a guidewire passage through the l
Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 5 years
Change in waveforms/TcPO2 from pre-procedure to 30 days
Change in waveforms/TcPO2 from pre-procedure
Time frame: 30 days
Change in waveforms/TcPO2 from pre-procedure to 6 months
Change in waveforms/TcPO2 from pre-procedure
Time frame: 6 months
Change in waveforms/TcPO2 from pre-procedure to 12 months
Change in waveforms/TcPO2 from pre-procedure
Time frame: 12 months
Change in waveforms/TcPO2 from pre-procedure to 24 months
Change in waveforms/TcPO2 from pre-procedure
Time frame: 24 months
Change in ankle-brachial index (ABI) from pre-procedure to 30 days
Change in ankle-brachial index (ABI) from pre-procedure
Time frame: 30 days
Change in ankle-brachial index (ABI) from pre-procedure to 6 months
Change in ankle-brachial index (ABI) from pre-procedure
Time frame: 6 months
Change in ankle-brachial index (ABI) from pre-procedure to 12 months
Change in ankle-brachial index (ABI) from pre-procedure
Time frame: 12 months
Change in ankle-brachial index (ABI) from pre-procedure to 24 months
Change in ankle-brachial index (ABI) from pre-procedure
Time frame: 24 months
Change in toe pressures (TP) from pre-procedure to 30 days
Change in toe pressures (TP) from pre-procedure
Time frame: 30 days
Change in toe pressures (TP) from pre-procedure to 6 months
Change in toe pressures (TP) from pre-procedure
Time frame: 6 months
Change in toe pressures (TP) from pre-procedure to 12 months
Change in toe pressures (TP) from pre-procedure
Time frame: 12 months
Change in toe pressures (TP) from pre-procedure to 24 months
Change in toe pressures (TP) from pre-procedure
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Rutherford-Becker Classification (RCC) from pre-procedure to 30 days
Change in Rutherford-Becker Classification (RCC) from pre-procedure
Time frame: 30 days
Change in Rutherford-Becker Classification (RCC) from pre-procedure to 6 months
Change in Rutherford-Becker Classification (RCC) from pre-procedure
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Rutherford-Becker Classification (RCC) from pre-procedure to 12 months
Change in Rutherford-Becker Classification (RCC) from pre-procedure
Time frame: 12 months
Change in Rutherford-Becker Classification (RCC) from pre-procedure to 24 months
Change in Rutherford-Becker Classification (RCC) from pre-procedure
Time frame: 24 months
Change in EQ-5D from pre-procedure to 30 days
Change in EQ-5D-5L (EuroQual-5 Dimension scale set and Visual Analog Scale score) from pre-procedure. Dimension score reporting will be determined at time of reporting and VAS score will be reported based on subject indicated scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate positive outcome improvement.
Time frame: 30 days
Change in EQ-5D from pre-procedure to 6 months
Change in EQ-5D-5L (EuroQual-5 Dimension scale set and Visual Analog Scale score) from pre-procedure. Dimension score reporting will be determined at time of reporting and VAS score will be reported based on subject indicated scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate positive outcome improvement.
Time frame: 6 months
Change in EQ-5D from pre-procedure to 12 months
Change in EQ-5D-5L (EuroQual-5 Dimension scale set and Visual Analog Scale score) from pre-procedure. Dimension score reporting will be determined at time of reporting and VAS score will be reported based on subject indicated scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate positive outcome improvement.
Time frame: 12 months
Change in EQ-5D from pre-procedure to 24 months
Change in EQ-5D-5L (EuroQual-5 Dimension scale set and Visual Analog Scale score) from pre-procedure. Dimension score reporting will be determined at time of reporting and VAS score will be reported based on subject indicated scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate positive outcome improvement.
Time frame: 24 months
In RCC 5 subjects, percentage of wounds healed from baseline to 30 days post-procedure as reported by the Investigator at the Investigative site
In RCC 5 subjects, percentage of wounds healed from baseline
Time frame: 30 days
In RCC 5 subjects, percentage of wounds healed from baseline to 6 months post-procedure as reported by the Investigator at the Investigative site
In RCC 5 subjects, percentage of wounds healed from baseline
Time frame: 6 months
In RCC 5 subjects, percentage of wounds healed from baseline to 12 months post-procedure as reported by the Investigator at the Investigative site
In RCC 5 subjects, percentage of wounds healed from baseline
Time frame: 12 months