This clinical trial evaluates the use of novel decision support educational materials and services using health coaches. The study includes men newly diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. A 160 men will be recruited. Half of the men will receive a call from a health coach before their initial consultation visit with their urologist to review their treatment concerns and questions. The other half will receive usual care provided by the urologist, such as educational materials and services provided by the urologist.
A critical public health need exists for improved prognostic tools to distinguish aggressive from slow growing prostate cancer at diagnosis, and for better support systems to guide patients in decision-making regarding management options. Decision support interventions that are tailored to specific clinical conditions are known to have increased patient self-efficacy, knowledge, question-asking, and satisfaction; and decreased decisional conflict, regret, anxiety, and distress. To reduce the risk of over-treatment, our team has developed individual risk prediction models that we have now integrated into our decision support intervention (DSI). Delivering such decision support intervention should increase patient knowledge and question-asking by the patient to their doctor. The decision support intervention can be delivered by telephone and or the Internet.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
119
A question list (QL) that includes areas of patient concern are created by the health coach for use by the patient and the urologist at their first consultation visit where they discuss the extent of their cancer and consider treatment options. The coach uses the Prostate Cancer SCOPED model to complete a "Prostate Cancer SCOPED Model Form". The SCOPED model uses concepts such as the situation, choices (treatment), objectives (personal goals and priorities), people (involved in supporting a treatment decision), evaluation and decisions (clarifying which choice is best and next steps).
Palo Alto Medical Foundation
Palo Alto, California, United States
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
CentraCare Clinic Adult & Pediatric Urology
Sartell, Minnesota, United States
Lancaster Urology
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Decision Quality Index (DQI) scores
The DQI measures patient Knowledge, Concordance, and Decision process. For each fact about prostate cancer item, a correct response = 1 point. Missing responses=0 points. Total score is calculated for all patients who complete at least half of the items and scaled from 0-100%, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge. Patients rate their goals and concerns on an 11-point importance scale from 0 (not important at all) to 10 (extremely important). These questions + one question about patient's treatment preference can be used to calculate a concordance score. Patients are asked about whether they were offered a choice, how much pros and cons were discussed, and whether the health care provider asked for their preferences. Participants get 1 point for a response of "yes" / "a lot/some.", total points are summed, then divided by total number of items for a decision making process score from 0-100%. Higher scores indicate a more shared decision making process.
Time frame: 12 months
Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) scores
The MAX-PC is an 18-item questionnaire with a 4-point Likert-type scale asking how frequently certain "comments made by men about prostate cancer" were true of the respondent (Roth et al., 2003). Each item is scored from 0 to 4 with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Often." The scale can be scored in its entirety by summing all the items or summary scores can be grouped into Prostate Cancer Anxiety (11 items), Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) Anxiety (3 items), or Fear of Re-occurrence (4 items).
Time frame: 12 months
Decision Self-Efficacy (DSE) Scores
The DSE measures self-confidence or belief in one's ability to make informed decisions and participate in shared decision making with health professionals. It is a 11-item instrument with a five-point response scale ranging from 0 (not at all confident) to 4 (very confident).
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.