This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled a convenience sample of adults and children presenting to two Level 1 trauma centers over 12-months with subcutaneous skin abscesses necessitating drainage. Two methods of drainage were compared: 1) the LOOP technique or 2) standard packing technique.
This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled a convenience sample of adults and children presenting to two Level 1 trauma centers over 12-months with subcutaneous skin abscesses necessitating drainage. Patients were excluded if the abscess was on the hand, foot, or face or if it required admission or operative intervention. Patients were followed over 10 days to determine the primary outcome of treatment failure defined by need for admission, IV antibiotics, or repeat drainage within 10-day follow-up. The secondary outcomes included ease of procedure, ease of care, pain after insertion and patient satisfaction using a 10-point numeric rating.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
217
Placement of subcutaneous loop drain
Incise and drain with placement of packing
Treatment Failure
Need for admission, IV antibiotics, or repeat drainage within 10-day follow-up derived from descriptive nature
Time frame: 10 Days
Procedure Pain
Procedure Pain using Likert scale 1-10
Time frame: At time of procedure
Ease of procedure
Ease of procedure using Likert 1-10 scale
Time frame: At time of procedure
Ease of care
Ease of care using 1-10 Likert scale
Time frame: During 10 days
Pain on follow-up
Pain on follow-up using 1-10 Likert scale
Time frame: 10 days
Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction using Patient derived Likert scale
Time frame: During 10 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.