The aims of this study are to test a manualized mind body skills-building program aimed at preventing the development of chronic pain and disability following acute musculoskeletal injury in at-risk patients.
This is a pilot randomized feasibility trial of the mind body program Toolkit for Optimal Recovery versus usual medical care. The Toolkit is delivered via secure live video to patients at risk for chronic pain, at 1-2 months after injury. The primary aim of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the program, randomization, procedures and outcome measures. Secondarily, we report means and standard deviation and explore change in quantitative outcomes in the Toolkit compared to usual care.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
55
The Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Injury (ToR) is a skills based mind body program that was designed to prevent the development of chronic pain and disability following an acute musculoskeletal injury (e.g., fracture). The program has 4 sessions and it is delivered via live video. Patients learn myth about recovery after injury, false and real pain alarms, the fear avoidance model and how to prevent the disability spiral, mindfulness based exercises and activity pacing.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Feasibility of recruitment
We will report number of patients approached, number who agreed to participate/were screened, number of patients randomized
Time frame: 0 Weeks
Satisfaction with ToR
3 questions assessing satisfaction with the physical recovery, with the care delivered, and with the clinician.
Time frame: 4 weeks; 3 months
Acceptability
We will report number of patients who finished ToR and UC and completed post-test from those who started the study (were randomized); We will also report number of participants who provided 3 months follow up
Time frame: 4 weeks; 3 months
Feasibility of outcome measures
We will report number of missing items and calculate reliability of outcome measures
Time frame: 0 weeks; 4 weeks; 3 months
Adherence to ToR
We will report number of participants who completed at least 3 out of 4 ToR sessions
Time frame: 4 weeks.
Adherence to homework
determined by number of homework logs returned
Time frame: 4 weeks
Therapist adherence survey
Items assessing whether the therapist taught each of the skills included in each of the 4 sessions
Time frame: 4 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS); items are summed to generate a total score; scores range from 0 to 52; higher scores indicate greater pain catastrophizing
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Pain Anxiety
Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale (PASS); items are summed to generate a total score; scores range from 0-100; higher sores indicate greater pain anxiety
Time frame: 0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Depression
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD); items are summed to generate a total score; scores range from 0 to 60; higher scores indicate greater depressive symptomatology
Time frame: 0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL); items are summed to generate a total score; scores range from 17 to 85; higher scores indicate greater post traumatic stress
Time frame: 0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Pain intensity
Numerical rating scale assessing pain form 0 to 10
Time frame: 0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Physical Function
Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA); two scores are generated by summing items 1-34 for Function Index and 35-46 for Bothersome Index;
Time frame: 0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months