This study evaluates whether treatment with ivabradine compared to placebo can improve exercise capacity in long-term heart transplant recipients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy and elevated heart rate at rest. Patients will receive treatment with either ivabradin or placebo for a period of 12 weeks.
Elevated resting heart rate (HR) is a normal finding after successful heart transplantation (HTx) due to parasympathetic denervation at the operation. Elevated resting HR is generally acknowledged as a negative predictor of outcome in heart disease. The impact in heart transplant recipients is not fully understood, however, it has been associated with increased risk of developing cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) or death. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is a diffuse vascular disease affecting the entire coronary tree. It is the leading cause of death in patients more than 5 years after HTx and it is well known that patients with CAV have markedly reduced exercise capacity. The association between elevated HR and CAV raises the question whether an intervention to specifically lower HR could improve symptoms and prognosis in heart transplant recipients with CAV and elevated resting HR. Small studies have shown that HR reduction using the If channel blocker ivabradine after HTx is safe. However, none of these studies were randomized or blinded, and as such proof of any efficacy (beyond HR reduction) after HTx is non-existing. Clearly, there is a need to determine if such treatment could improve exercise capacity, graft function and prognosis after HTx.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
35
Ivabradine, oral tablets, 5 mg, coated in gelatine capsules to ensure blinding, 1 capsule twice a day, for a period of 12 weeks
Placebo, gelatine capsules to ensure blinding, 1 capsule twice daily, for a period of 12 weeks
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
RECRUITINGΔVO2max
The change in VO2max (ΔVO2max) (mL/kg/min) from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up. The peak oxygen uptake (VO2max) reflects the maximal ability of a person to take in, transport and use oxygen, and it defines the functional aerobic capacity. It is used to provide an overall assessment of exercise capacity.
Time frame: The VO2max is assessed at baseline and 12 weeks follow-up.
ΔHRrest
Change in resting HR (beats/min) from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
ΔHRreserve
Change in HR reserve (beats/min) from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
ΔLVmass
Change in left ventricular (LV) mass (g) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
ΔLVEF
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
Δmitral deceleration time
Change in mitral decelaration time (ms) evaluated by echocardiography from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
ΔE/é
Change in E/é evaluated by echocardiography from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
ΔE/A ratio
Change in E/A ratio evaluated by echocardiography from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Δisovolumetric relaxation time
Change in isovolumetric relaxation time (ms) evaluated by echocardiography from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
Δtransmitral flow rate
Change in transmitral flow rate (volume/min) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
Δpulmonary venous flow
Change in pulmonary venous flow (volume/min) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
ΔLVEDV
Change in LVEDV (left ventricular end diastolic volume) (ml) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
ΔLVESV
Change in LVESV (left ventricular end systolic volume) (ml) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
ΔLV peak filling rate
Change in left ventricular (LV) peak filling rate (volume/min) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
Δtime to peak filling
Change in time to peak filling (sec) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
ΔQOL KCCQ
Change in QOL score evaluated by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
ΔQOL EQ-5D-5L
Change in QOL score evaluated by EQ-5D-5L questionnaire from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks