The purpose of this research is to compare two different approaches for treating patients with temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD): Dry needling and spinal manipulation or Interocclusal Appliance (Splint), NSAIDs and Temporomandibular Joint Mobilization . Clinicians commonly use all of these techniques to treat TMD. This study is attempting to find out if one treatment strategy is more effective than the other.
Patients with stress temporomandibular dysfunction will be randomized to receive 1-2 treatment sessions per week for up to 4 weeks ( up to 8 sessions total) of either: (1) dry needling and spinal manipulation or (2) Interocclusal appliance (splint), NSAIDs, temporomandibular joint mobilization.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
120
Dry needling to the muscle of mastication and temporomandibular joint capsule. 1-2 treatment sessions per week for up to 4 weeks
Spinal manipulation, targeting the upper cervical spine (C1-C2, C2-C3 or OA). 1-2 treatments per week for up to 4 weeks.
Interocclusal appliance worn every nights for 4 weeks.
Physiomed-lab
Thessaloniki, Greece
Visual Analogue Scale
Change in average jaw pain intensity rated by the patient over last 24 hours and last 7 days (VAS: 0-100mm) between baseline and the following time points: 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months. Even though patients will be treated 1-2 treatments per week for 4 weeks (up to 8 treatments total), the visual analogue score after 2 weeks of treatment, at 6 weeks (2 weeks post treatment) and at 3 months (2 months post treatment) will be compared to baseline (pre-treatment). Scores closer to 0 represent less pain.
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Global Rating of Perceived Change
Global rating of perceived change rated rated by the patient according to a -7 to +7 scale. More specifically, the Global Rating of Perceived Change is rated as follows: * A very great deal worse (-7) * A great deal worse (-6) * Quite a bit worse (-5) * Moderately worse (-4) * Somewhat worse (-3) * A little bit worse (-2) * A tiny bit worse (almost the same) (-1) * About the same (0) * A very great deal better (+7) * A great deal better (+6) * Quite a bit better (+5) * Moderately better (+4) * Somewhat better (+3) * A little bit better (+2) * A tiny bit better (almost the same) (+1) The patient will choose a rating (the closer to +7, the better the score / the closer to -7, the worse the score) after 2 weeks of treatment, at 6 weeks (2 weeks post-treatment) and 3 months (2 months post-treatment).
Time frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Active Pain Free Mouth Opening
Change in the distance between upper and lower central incisors after patient has opening mouth "as wide as possible" without causing pain between baseline and the following time points: 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months. Measurements will be taken in mm. The greater the distance, the better the score. Even though patients will be treated 1-2 treatments per week for 4 weeks (up to 8 treatments total), active pain free mouth opening after 2 weeks of treatment, at 6 weeks (2 weeks post treatment) and at 3 months (2 months post treatment) will be compared to baseline (pre-treatment) Greater scores represent greater pain free mouth opening.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
diclofenac (Voltaren) 3 X 50mg per day for 4 weeks. If the patient's TMJ pain improves, the dosage may be reduced to 2 X 50mg per day.
Temporomandibular joint mobilization targeting the temporomandibular joint capsule. 1-2 treatments per week for up to 4 weeks.
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months