This phase II trial studies how well osimertinib, surgery, and radiation therapy work in treating patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations. Osimertinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Giving osimertinib, surgery, and radiation therapy may work better at treating non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine whether, in patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) naive or TKI resistant (acquired T790M) metastatic EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who do not progress after 6-12 weeks of induction osimertinib, local consolidative therapy (LCT; radiotherapy +/- surgical resection) followed by osimertinib prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) compared with osimertinib alone. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether osimertinib plus LCT improves time to progression of non-irradiated lesions (TTP-NIL) and time to appearance of new metastases (TANM) compared with osimertinib alone. II. To determine whether osimertinib plus LCT improves the time to progression of target versus (vs.) non-target lesions compared with osimertinib alone. III. To determine whether osimertinib plus LCT improves progression-free survival compared with osimertinib alone in TKI naive EGFR (L8585R/exon 19 deletion) mutant metastatic NSCLC. IV. To determine whether osimertinib plus LCT improves progression-free survival compared with osimertinib alone in TKI resistant (acquired T790M) EGFR mutant NSCLC. V. To determine whether osimertinib plus LCT improves progression-free survival compared with osimertinib alone in the subgroup of patients with oligometastatic NSCLC (up to 3 metastases). VI. To assess the safety and tolerability of osimertinib with and without LCT. VII. To determine whether osimertinib plus LCT improves overall survival (OS) compared with osimertinib alone. VIII. To determine if there is a difference in survival outcomes or toxicity by radiation treatment modality (protons vs. photons). EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To explore the association of baseline genomic, proteomic and gene expression profiles (from tumor, germline deoxyribonucleic acid \[DNA\], and cell free \[cf\]DNA) with clinical benefit and in patients treated with osimertinib with or without LCT. II. To determine modulation of genomic, proteomic and gene expression tumor profiles by induction osimertinib. III. To explore osimertinib resistance mechanisms. IV. To determine the immunomodulatory effects of osimertinib plus LCT. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups. GROUP I (LCT): Patients receive osimertinib orally (PO) once daily (QD) for 6-12 weeks. Patients then undergo surgery and/or radiation therapy daily for 5 consecutive days every week for up to 8 weeks. Patients continue osimertinib during and after radiation therapy. Cycles repeat every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. GROUP II (NO LCT): Patients receive osimertinib PO QD. Cycles repeat every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up within 30 days, then every 6 months thereafter.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
173
Given PO
Undergo radiation therapy
Undergo surgery
UCSF Medical Center-Mount Zion
San Francisco, California, United States
University of Colorado
Denver, Colorado, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Progression free survival (PFS)
Will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The stratified log-rank test will be performed to test the difference in time-to-event distributions between treatment groups. Stratified Cox proportional hazards model will be utilized to include multiple covariates in the time-to-event analysis and to estimate hazard ratios.
Time frame: From the start date of osimertinib assessed up to 4 years
Overall survival
Will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The stratified log-rank test will be performed to test the difference in time-to-event distributions between treatment groups. Stratified Cox proportional hazards model will be utilized to include multiple covariates in the time-to-event analysis and to estimate hazard ratios.
Time frame: From the treatment start date assessed up to 4 years
Time to progression of target lesions
Will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The stratified log-rank test will be performed to test the difference in time-to-event distributions between treatment groups. Stratified Cox proportional hazards model will be utilized to include multiple covariates in the time-to-event analysis and to estimate hazard ratios.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Time to appearance of new metastases
Will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The stratified log-rank test will be performed to test the difference in time-to-event distributions between treatment groups. Stratified Cox proportional hazards model will be utilized to include multiple covariates in the time-to-event analysis and to estimate hazard ratios.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
PFS in oligometastatic subgroup
Will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The stratified log-rank test will be performed to test the difference in time-to-event distributions between treatment groups. Stratified Cox proportional hazards model will be utilized to include multiple covariates in the time-to-event analysis and to estimate hazard ratios.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Incidence of adverse events
Toxicity data related to the treatments will be summarized by frequency tables. The association between the types and severity of toxicity and the treatment groups will be evaluated.
Time frame: Up to 30 days post treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.