This first study will enroll 3 groups of patients with vocal fold nodules that will receive different schedules of ambulatory voice biofeedback (100% frequency feedback, 25% frequency feedback, summary feedback) to avoid their upper 15th percentile of vocal loudness.
We will conduct this study (based on principles of motor learning) using novel smartphone-based ambulatory voice biofeedback systems aimed at improving the carryover of newly established vocal behaviors into daily life. This first study will determine which of three types of ambulatory feedback results in better learning/retention (100% frequency, 25% frequency, or delayed summary feedback every 2 minutes of voicing) of a new vocal behavior (reduced vocal intensity) in three groups of 15 patients with vocal fold nodules. Hypothesis: Patients receiving lower frequency or summary feedback will produce lower initial performance but higher short- and long-term retention than patients receiving feedback 100% of the time.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
29
Subjects will be provided cues regarding their vocal behavior in daily life. The cues will either be: 100% feedback = a vibrotactile cue on a smartwatch every time the patient voices incorrectly... 25% feedback = a vibrotactile cue on a smartwatch every 4th time the patient voices incorrectly... Summary feedback = the patient's overall compliance (percentage of voiced time within desired limits) will be presented via a smartwatch every 2 minutes of voicing.
Massachusetts General Hospital - Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Percent Compliance
Percentage compliance is the amount of voiced time patients spent below their biofeedback threshold divided by the total amount of voiced time. Each patient's biofeedback threshold was individually established as their 85th percentile of vocal intensity. Patients were asked to avoid loud voicing, i.e., anything at their 85th percentile or higher. During biofeedback, patients were cued every time (100% frequency) or every 4th time (25% frequency) the voiced louder than their 85th percentile; or provided summary information (their percentage compliance) after every 2 minutes of voicing (summary feedback). During short-term retention monitoring, patients were asked to not voice loud (over or equal to 85th percentile) the next day and the biofeedback was turned off. During long-term retention monitoring, patients were asked to not voice loud one week later without biofeedback.
Time frame: 1 week
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.