The Ischemia-IMT (Ischemia-Intensive Medical Treatment Reduces Events in Women with Non-Obstructive CAD), subtitle: Women's Ischemia Trial to Reduce Events in Non-Obstructive CAD (WARRIOR) trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded outcome evaluation (PROBE design) evaluating intensive statin/ACE-I (or ARB)/aspirin treatment (IMT) vs. usual care (UC) in 4,422 symptomatic women patients with symptoms and/or signs of ischemia but no obstructive CAD. The hypothesis is that IMT will reduce major adverse coronary events (MACE) 20% vs. UC. The primary outcome is first occurrence of MACE as death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) or hospitalization for heart failure or angina. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, time to "return to duty"/work, health resource consumption, angina, cardiovascular (CV) death and primary outcome components. Events will be adjudicated by an experienced Clinical Events Committee (CEC). Follow-up was planned to be 3-years using 50 sites: primarily VA and Active Duty Military Hospitals/Clinics and a National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) clinical data research network (CDRN)(OneFlorida Consortium). The number of sites were increased and follow up was modified to continue until the last patient enrolled was followed until trial follow up was completed. Recruitment was complete January 6, 2024. This study is being conducted to determine whether intensive medication treatment to modify risk factors and vascular function in women patients with coronary arteries showing no flow limit obstruction but with cardiac symptoms (i.e., chest pain, shortness of breath) will reduce the patient's likelihood of dying, having a heart attack, stroke/TIA or being hospitalized for cardiac reasons. The results will provide evidence data necessary to inform future guidelines regarding how best to treat this growing population of patients, and ultimately improve the patient's cardiac health and quality of life and reduce health-care costs.
WARRIOR trial is a multi-site, PROBE design, that will evaluate an intensive statin/ACE-I (or ARB)/aspirin treatment strategy (IMT) vs. primary prevention risk factor therapy treatment strategy (UC) in 4,422 symptomatic (chronic angina or equivalent) women with non-obstructive CAD (\<50% diameter narrowing). There will be \~80 US sites, including VA/ military and OneFlorida CDRN sites, with a proven record in prior trials. The investigators will use web-based, real-time data entry, and management University of Florida Data Management System (UFDMS) for site selection, screening, participant eligibility confirmation, enrollment, and randomization. Participants will be recruited from screened women with symptoms suspected to be ischemic with non-obstructive CAD by invasive coronary angiogram or CT angiogram. The high dose statin (atorvastatin or rosuvastatin) and ACE-I (lisinopril) \[or ARB (losartan)\] are generic commonly used medications previously demonstrated effective for improving angina, stress testing, myocardial perfusion and coronary microvascular flow reserve in small size trials in this population. Additionally, aspirin will also be recommended to IMT participants without contraindications or excess bleeding risk, however aspirin will not be provided by the study. Both the groups will also receive Lifestyle Counseling (PACE Assessment), and the same visit schedule and "face-time" with site staff to reduce bias. Events will be adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC), according to objective criteria and masked to treatment assignment clues.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
2,476
The IMT-assigned women will receive high-dose, potent statin (atorvastatin 40-80 mg/d or rosuvastatin 20-40mg) class of lipid-lowering medications.
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely prescribed for primary hypertension.
Will be recommended to IMT women without contraindications or bleeding risk.
The PACE Lifestyle Assessment Intervention which is a program to assist with smoking cessation, weight loss, and exercise.
Quality of Life Questionnaires will be obtained.
Cardiology Associates of Mobile, Inc.
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Dignity Health-Mercy Gilbert Medical Center
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
Dignity Health-St. Joseph
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, United States
University of Arkansas
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
The primary outcome is MACE, defined as first occurrence of all-cause death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for angina or HF.
All-cause death will be used 1) CV death is insensitive in this population with non-obstructive CAD since death is less likely attributed to CV causes when no obstructive CAD is present; 2) all-cause death is resistant to ascertainment bias in this unblinded trial. CV death will be defined broadly to include both definite CV death and possible CV death (all deaths except those with definite non-CV cause, e.g., cancer, witnessed trauma and homicide). The MI definition follows universal criteria for Types 1-5 MI events. Stroke/TIA definition is new onset neurological defect of central origin confirmed by brain imaging (CT or MRI) evidence of cerebral infarction or intracerebral hemorrhage. Hospitalization for angina- Any hospitalization for angina, plus unstable angina or ACS. Hospitalization for Heart Failure -required established objective criteria for heart failure. All MACE events are adjudicated by a blinded Clinical Endpoint Committee
Time frame: Within 5 years
Components of MACE
The analysis will be repeated for the following combinations of MACE events (1) composite outcome of CV-death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke/TIA; (2) composite outcome CV-death, non-fatal MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for angina or heart failure; (3) all-cause mortality; (4) CV-death (5) total MI \[fatal plus non-fatal\]; (6) resuscitated cardiac arrest; (7) hospitalization for angina; (8) hospitalization for HF; (9) total stroke/TIA \[fatal plus non- fatal\]; (10) composite outcome of CV-death, non-fatal MI, stroke/TIA, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for angina or heart failure.
Time frame: Within 5 years
Composite hierarchical MACE endpoint
The comparison of randomized treatment strategies for composite hierarchical endpoint will be conducted using win statistics (WS), including the win ratio (WR), win odds (WO), will be computed to compare two groups based on hierarchical order of clinical importance as follows: 1) all cause death within 5 yrs, 2) stroke within 5 yrs, 3) MI within 5 yrs, 4) number of hospitalization within 5 yrs, 5) first hospitalization for heart failure or chest pain within 5 yrs, and 6) average of SAQ7 at 6 months and 1-year. The WR method compares each patient in the intervention group with every patient in the control group, and the magnitude of the effect is computed as the ratio of the total number of pairwise "wins" to "losses" considering the predefined hierarchy of the outcomes. Since the WR does not account for ties that the WO will also be computed. The benefit of the IMT arm is indicated by an estimate of WS/WO test statistic with their respective 95% confidence intervals greater than 1.
Time frame: Within 5 years
Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).
QoL comparisons will adhere to the ITT principle. We will examine changes over time from baseline and identify the major determinants of those changes using regression analysis. Questionnaires, such as the SAQ scores, at each time point will be analyzed using linear mixed models with correlation within subjects over time. In case the outcome residuals do not have a normal distribution, a transformation will be considered (e.g. log, Box-Cox). Interaction of group and time effects will be examined to assess for different time trends between groups.
Time frame: Study entry and every six months until end of follow up (up to 72 months)
EQ-5D-3L
Evaluated over time by group.
Time frame: Study entry and every six months until end of follow up (up to 72 months)
Duke Activity Status Inventory (DASI)
DASI as assessed over time by group.
Time frame: Study entry and every six months until end of follow up (up to 72 months)
Modified Morisky Medicine Scale Take your medication
Measure of medication compliance between groups over time.
Time frame: Study entry and every six months until end of follow up (up to 72 months)
PACE (Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly).
Assessment of healthy lifestyle intervention between groups over time.
Time frame: Study entry and every six months until end of follow up (up to 72 months)
PCL-5 (Screening for PTSD).
Screening for PTSD over time between groups
Time frame: Study entry and every six months until end of follow up (up to 72 months)
Health care utilization and cost effectiveness
Comparing health care resource utilization across time between groups.
Time frame: Study entry and every six months until end of follow up (up to 72 months)
GAD 7
Assessment of general anxiety over time between groups
Time frame: Study entry and every six months until end of follow up (up to 72 months)
PHQ 8
Assessment of depression over time between groups
Time frame: Study entry and every six months until end of follow up (up to 72 months)
MACE and Quality of Life outcomes will also be stratified by enrollment assessment of non-obstructive CAD using noninvasive CCTA vs invasive coronary angiography
MACE is first occurrence of all cause death, non fatal MI, non fatal stroke or TIA, hospitalization for heart failure, hospitalization for chest pain/angina. Quality of life is being assessed using Seattle Angina Questionnaire, SAQ7 and all of the SAQ domains, PTSD is being assessed using the PCL5, functional capacity is being assessed using the Duke Activity Status Index, EQ-5D-3L, Depression is being assessed using the PHQ-8 and anxiety using the GAD-7
Time frame: Within 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute
Los Angeles, California, United States
UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, California, United States
Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Clearwater Cardiovascular Consultants Clinical Research
Clearwater, Florida, United States
...and 71 more locations