The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA™ XC in adult participants seeking correction of hollowing of the tear troughs.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
163
JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA™ XC dermal filler injected into the infraorbital and adjacent area.
Christopher I. Zoumalan MD Inc.
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Steve Yoelin MD Medical Associate, Inc.
Newport Beach, California, United States
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-point Improvement Change From Baseline on the Allergan Infraorbital Hollows Scale (AIHS) Based on Evaluating Investigator's (EI) Assessment
The evaluating investigator assessed hollowing in both infraorbital areas using the 5-point photonumeric AIHS where: 0=none (no visible hollowing or volume loss medially or laterally), 1=minimal (presence of hollowing with some volume loss medial to the mid-pupillary line; smooth lateral lid-cheek transition), 2=moderate (defined hollowing extending laterally beyond the mid-pupillary line with moderate volume loss; smooth lateral lid-cheek transition with mild volume loss), 3=severe (defined hollowing extending laterally beyond the mid-pupillary line with moderate volume loss creating a defined groove along the lid-cheek junction), 4=extreme (defined hollowing extends from medial to lateral canthus; severe volume loss creates a marked step along the lid-cheek junction). The percentage of participants with at least a 1-point improvement change (decrease) in the AIHS is reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Screening) to Month 3 post last treatment (JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA™ XC arm) or Month 3 post randomization (No-treatment Control arm)
Percentage of Participants Improved or Much Improved in the Overall Aesthetic Assessment Based on EI's Assessment of the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Month 3 After the Last Treatment
The evaluating investigator assessed a participant's global aesthetic improvement in the infraorbital area compared to Baseline using the 5-point GAIS where: 2=much improved (marked improvement in appearance), 1=improved (improvement in appearance, but a touch-up or retreatment is indicated), 0=no change (appearance is essentially the same as the original condition), -1=worse (appearance is worse than the original condition), -2=much worse (appearance is much worse than the original condition). The percentage of participants where the EI selected improved or much improved is reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Randomization) to Month 3 post last treatment (JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA™ XC) or Month 3 post randomization (No-treatment Control arm)
Percentage of Participants Improved or Much Improved in the Overall Aesthetic Assessment Based on Participant's Assessment of the GAIS at Month 3 After the Last Treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Cosmetic Laser Dermatology
San Diego, California, United States
Facesplus, Inc.
San Diego, California, United States
Art of Skin MD
Solana Beach, California, United States
Steven Fagien M.D.F.A.C.S.
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
Center For Sight
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Lupo Center for Aesthetic and General Dermatology
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Image Dermatology, P.C.
Montclair, New Jersey, United States
Williams Plastic Surgery Specialists
Latham, New York, United States
...and 5 more locations
The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement in the infraorbital area compared to Baseline using the 5-point GAIS where: 2=much improved (marked improvement in appearance), 1=improved (improvement in appearance, but a touch-up or retreatment is indicated), 0=no change (appearance is essentially the same as the original condition), -1=worse (appearance is worse than the original condition), -2=much worse (appearance is much worse than the original condition). The percentage of participants who selected improved or much improved is reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Randomization) to Month 3 post last treatment
Mean Change From Baseline in Rasch-Transformed Score Based on Participant Responses on the FACE-Q™ Appraisal of Lower Eyelids Questionnaire to Month 3 After the Last Treatment
Participants assessed their overall satisfaction by using 7 questions on the validated Appraisal of Lower Eyelids module of the FACE-Q™ questionnaire. Each question was answered on a 4-point scale where: 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=moderately, and 4=extremely bothered. The responses to the items were transformed to create a Rasch transformed score that ranges from 0=worst to 100=best. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (Randomization) to Month 3 post last treatment