Given the uncertain benefit in efficacy of adding CDK 4/6 to first rather than second line endocrine treatment, the aim of this project is to evaluate whether the sequence of an aromatase inhibitor plus CDK 4/6 in first line followed by fulvestrant in second line is superior to the sequence of an aromatase inhibitor in first line followed by fulvestrant plus CDK4/6 in second line.
Combining cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors with endocrine therapies in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer has shown to result in substantial improvements in progression-free survival. There is however no evidence that this combination strategy leads to an improved overall survival. Furthermore, no specific subgroups that will or will not benefit from the combination of drugs have been identified yet. This means the optimal strategy for deploying CDK 4/6 inhibitors in clinical practice is not yet known. Since CDK 4/6 inhibitors are costly and can have toxic effects, it is important to determine the optimal treatment strategy to avoid both over- and undertreatment. The SONIA-trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized phase III study. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate if treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor combined with CDK 4/6 inhibition in first line followed at progression by fulvestrant in second line (strategy A) improves progression-free survival compared to treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor in first line followed at progression by fulvestrant combined with CDK4/6 inhibition in second line (strategy B). The primary end point is progression-free survival after two lines (PFS2), secondary end points include overall survival, quality of life, safety and biomarker analyses.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,050
Adding CDK 4/6 inhibitor (pabociclib, ribociclib or abemaciclib depending on availability and physician's preference) to either first line treatment (with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors, either letrozole or anastrozole) or second line treatment (with fulvestrant) in advanced HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer
Adding CDK 4/6 inhibitor (pabociclib, ribociclib or abemaciclib depending on availability and physician's preference) to either first line treatment (with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors, either letrozole or anastrozole) or second line treatment (with fulvestrant) in advanced HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer
Adding CDK 4/6 inhibitor (pabociclib, ribociclib or abemaciclib depending on availability and physician's preference) to either first line treatment (with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors, either letrozole or anastrozole) or second line treatment (with fulvestrant) in advanced HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer
PFS2
Progression-free survival after two lines of treatment (PFS2)
Time frame: Until objective disease progression, symptomatic deterioration, or unacceptable toxicity on second line treatment, death, strategy violation, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 60 months
OS
Overall survival
Time frame: Date of randomization until date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 60 months
FACT-B questionnaire
Quality of Life questionnaire
Time frame: Questionnaires will be administered at baseline and thereafter every three months, up to 60 months
EQ-5D questionnaire
Quality of Life questionnaire
Time frame: Questionnaires will be administered at baseline and thereafter every three months, up to 60 months
iMTA RUQ-B questionnaire
Quality of Life questionnaire
Time frame: Questionnaires will be administered at baseline and thereafter every six months, up to 60 months
Number of participants with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related neutropenia as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Safety assessment will consist of monitoring of all grade 3 and grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count/L)
Time frame: Through study completion, assessed up to 60 months
Number of participants with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related thrombocytopenia as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Safety assessment will consist of monitoring of all grade 3 and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (platelet count/L)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
Noordwestziekenhuisgroep
Alkmaar, Netherlands
ZGT
Almelo, Netherlands
Flevoziekenhuis
Almere Stad, Netherlands
Meander Medisch Centrum
Amersfoort, Netherlands
Ziekenhuis Amstelland
Amstelveen, Netherlands
Nki - Avl
Amsterdam, Netherlands
VUmc
Amsterdam, Netherlands
AMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
BovenIJ Ziekenhuis
Amsterdam, Netherlands
...and 62 more locations
Time frame: Through study completion, assessed up to 60 months
Number of participants with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related anemia as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Safety assessment will consist of monitoring of all grade 3 and grade 4 anemia (mmol/L)
Time frame: Through study completion, assessed up to 60 months
Number of participants with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related elevated liver enzymes (ALAT/ASAT/AF/GGT/bilirubin) as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Safety assessment will consist of monitoring of all grade 3 and grade 4 elevated liver enzymes (elevation compared to upper limit of normal)
Time frame: Through study completion, assessed up to 60 months
Number of participants with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related other toxicities as defined in CTCAE v4.0
Safety assessment will consist of monitoring of all grade 3 and grade 4 other toxicities as defined in CTCAE v4.0
Time frame: Through study completion, assessed up to 60 months
Cost-effectiveness by means of a decision model (a multistate Markov model or a Discrete Event Simulation model)
The cost and outcomes of both arms will be assessed by means of a decision model (a multistate Markov model or a Discrete Event Simulation model). Cost-effectiveness will be determined by comparing costs and effects of both treatment strategies. Quality adjusted life years will be computed by multiplying life-years with the observed utility scores during those life years. The friction cost method will be used for estimating the societal costs of productivity losses. Unit costs for drugs will be derived from www.medicijnkosten.nl or the Z-index. The costs of a hospital day, outpatient visit, and day care treatment, will be based on the Dutch costing manual. Other costs will be collected from NZA tariffs. All costs will be expressed in Euros.
Time frame: At 60 months after entry into the study
ORR
Objective response rate
Time frame: Through study completion, assessed up to 60 months
Plasma through levels
Plasma through levels of CDK4/6 inhibitor measured in blood samples obtained at cycle 1, day 15 (of 28 days in one cycle) and at cycle 2, day 15 in participants treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Time frame: Through study completement
Pharmacogenomics
DNA sequencing in a blood sample obtained at cycle 1, day 15 (of 28 days in one cycle) of treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitor.
Time frame: On day 15 of cycle 1 (a cycle is 28 days)
Liquid biopsies
Circulating tumor DNA isolated from blood samples collected at 7 timepoints during the study. Mutation level during the study and at disease progression will be compared to base-line mutation level.
Time frame: At baseline of first line, at cycle 1 day 15 (a cycle is 28 days), at cycle 4 day 1, at baseline of second line, at cycle 1 day 15 (a cycle is 28 days), at cycle 4 day 1 and at disease progression
Tissue microarray
Tissue microarray on archived FFPE tissue blocks of the tumor
Time frame: At baseline