Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® With Lidocaine for Improvement of Volume and Aesthetic Appearance of the Nose in Chinese Adults

Allergan164 enrolled

Overview

The purpose of this study is to determine whether VOLUMA with Lidocaine is safe and effective for the improvement of volume and aesthetic appearance of the nose in the Chinese population.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

164

Conditions

Nose Enhancement

Interventions

JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® with LidocaineDEVICE

Treatment with JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® with Lidocaine injectable gel with optional treatment 8 weeks later.

No-treatment controlOTHER

No treatment during the control period.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Is not satisfied with his/her aesthetic appearance due to structural features of his/her nose and assessed as either "dissatisfied" or "very dissatisfied" by using the 5-point Nose Satisfaction Scale (NSS) * Requires a total volume of at least 0.5 mL but not exceeding 3.0 mL of VOLUMA with Lidocaine for initial and touch-up treatment combined, and treatment to the nasal dorsum is mandatory to achieve an aesthetic improvement in the subject's nose appearance, in the Treating Investigator (TI's) opinion * Has a reasonable treatment goal for aesthetic improvement in nose, in the TI's opinion. Participant and TI have aligned the treatment goals. Exclusion Criteria: * Has a small, shallow nose such that the volume of filler implant needed to create the desired dorsal height is in excess of the ability of the skin and soft tissue to expand and accommodate the implant * Has active autoimmune disease * Is on a concurrent regimen of lidocaine or structurally-related local anesthetics (eg, bupivacaine) * Is on an ongoing regimen of anti-coagulation therapy (eg, warfarin) * Within 10 days of undergoing study device injection, is on an ongoing regimen of medications (eg, aspirin or ibuprofen) or other substances (eg, high doses of Vitamin C or Vitamin E or herbal supplements with garlic, gingko biloba, or ginseng) known to increase coagulation time, or is currently menstruating (study treatment may be delayed as necessary to accommodate menstrual period cessation and/or anticoagulation washout interval) * Has participated in any clinical trials within 4 weeks prior to signing the informed consent form (ICF) or is planning to participate in another clinical trial during the course of this study * Females who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy during the course of the study. Females of childbearing potential who have a positive pregnancy test result during screening. Females who intend to breastfeed during the study. Females of childbearing potential who are unwilling to use birth control measures during the full course of the study. Birth control measures include oral contraceptives (stable) use for 2 or more cycles prior to screening), intrauterine devices, hormonal injections, hormonal implants, bilateral tube ligation, vasectomy, condom or diaphragm plus either contraceptive sponge, foam, or jelly

Locations (5)

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Peking University Third Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine

Beijing, Shanghai Municipality, China

Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Volume Change From Baseline in the Nose Area

Volume of the nose was calculated by digital analysis of each participant's 3-dimensional (3D) images. A mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used for analysis. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. An analysis model was created by Canfield Scientific, only volume changes are available. Actual Baseline values are not available.

Time frame: Baseline (Last value prior to treatment for the treatment group and last value prior to randomization for control group) to Week 24

Secondary Outcomes

Percentage of Participants Where the Evaluating Investigator Noted "Improved" or "Much Improved Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)

The Evaluating Investigator assessed the aesthetic improvement of the nose using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=much improved, 1=improved, 0=no change, -1=worse and -2=much worse. The percentage of participants who the Evaluating Investigator assessed as 2=much improved or 1=improved is reported.

Time frame: Week 24

Percentage of Participants Who Noted "Improved" or "Much Improved" as Assessed by the Participant Using the GAIS in the Treatment Group

The participant assessed the aesthetic improvement of the nose using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=much improved, 1=improved, 0=no change, -1=worse and -2=much worse. The percentage of participants who assess themselves as 2=much improved or 1=improved is reported.

Time frame: Week 24

Percentage of Participants Who Noted "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" With Treatment Outcome on the Nose Satisfaction Scale (NSS) in the Treatment Group

The participant used the 5-point NSS to assess the treatment outcome of the nose where: +2=very satisfied, +1=satisfied, 0=neutral (neither satisfied or dissatisfied), -1=dissatisfied and -2= very dissatisfied. The percentage of participants who assessed themselves as +2=Very Satisfied or +1=Satisfied is reported.

Time frame: Week 24

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.