This study consists of a dose escalation study with an expansion phase to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy of exicorilant (CORT125281) in combination with enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to identify a recommended dose (RD) for Phase 2 studies.
Exicorilant is a selective glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist. In this study, exicorilant will be administered orally in combination with enzalutamide to patients with mCRPC to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, PD, and preliminary efficacy of the regimen. The study consists of 2 phases: a dose-determination phase and an expansion phase. The dose determination phase is designed to determine dose-limiting toxicities and the RD of exicorilant plus enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC. Once the recommended dosing regimen has been determined, the following expansion cohorts will be enrolled and treated with exicorilant plus enzalutamide at the RD level. Abiraterone-Resistant Cohort: Patients who have progressed during treatment with abiraterone, and have received no other androgen receptor (AR)-blocking therapies. AR Antagonist-Resistant Cohort: Patients who have progressed during treatment with enzalutamide or other second-generation AR inhibitors. The effect of food on exicorilant PK will be assessed in a portion of the patients enrolled in the Expansion Phase. The 2 expansion cohorts will be enrolled in parallel. In each phase of the study, routine assessments of safety and tolerability will be performed and samples will be collected to determine standard PK parameters for exicorilant, enzalutamide, and their major metabolites. PD, quality of life evaluations and preliminary evaluations of antitumor activity of exicorilant with enzalutamide will be performed throughout the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
39
Exicorilant is supplied as capsules for oral dosing
Enzalutamide will be taken orally
Placebo capsules to match the appearance of the exicorilant capsules
Scottsdale
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Detroit
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Basking Ridge
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States
New York
New York, New York, United States
Number of Patients With One or More Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
Assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or biologically active doses of exicorilant in combination with enzalutamide to identify the recommended dose (RD) for Phase 2 studies based on the number of patients who experienced a DLT while receiving exicorilant in combination with enzalutamide. DLTs were defined as any of the protocol-specified toxicities that the Investigator considered possibly or probably related to study drug that occurred during the DLT-evaluation period. The MTD is defined as the highest dose at which the DLT rate was \<33%.
Time frame: From first dose of exicorilant through completion of Cycle 1 (up to 28 days) for Segment 1 and from first dose of exicorilant through completion of Cycle 3 (up to 84 days) for Segment 2
Number of Patients With One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
The safety of each treatment group will be assessed by evaluating the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events.
Time frame: Up to 27 months for Segment 1 and up to 19 months for Segment 2
Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) of Plasma Exicorilant: Segment 1
AUC from time zero to 12 hours postdose (AUC0-12) calculated using linear up and log down method.
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 12 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Plasma Exicorilant: Segment 1
Maximum observed concentration over the dosing interval
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 12 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1
AUC of Plasma Enzalutamide: Segment 1
AUC from time zero to 24 hours postdose (AUC0-24) calculated using linear up and log down method.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Portland
Portland, Oregon, United States
Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
London
London, England, United Kingdom
Southampton
Southampton, England, United Kingdom
Sutton
Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 24 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day -1, Cycle 1 Day 1, and Cycle 2 Day 1
Cmax of Plasma Enzalutamide: Segment 1
Maximum observed concentration over the dosing interval
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 24 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day -1, Cycle 1 Day 1, and Cycle 2 Day 1
AUC of Plasma N-Desmethyl Enzalutamide: Segment 1
AUC0-24 calculated using linear up and log down method.
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 24 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day -1, Cycle 1 Day 1, and Cycle 2 Day 1
Cmax of Plasma N-Desmethyl Enzalutamide: Segment 1
Maximum observed concentration over the dosing interval
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 24 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day -1, Cycle 1 Day 1, and Cycle 2 Day 1
AUC of Plasma Enzalutamide Carboxylic Acid: Segment 1
AUC0-24 calculated using linear up and log down method.
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 24 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day -1, Cycle 1 Day 1, and Cycle 2 Day 1
Cmax of Plasma Enzalutamide Carboxylic Acid: Segment 1
Maximum observed concentration over the dosing interval
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 24 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day -1, Cycle 1 Day 1, and Cycle 2 Day 1
AUC of Plasma Exicorilant: Segment 2
AUC from time zero to 6 hours postdose (AUC0-6) calculated using linear up and log down method. Patients in Arm B did not receive dose escalations, but they were sampled for pharmacokinetic analysis on the same time frame as the Arm A patients: Cycle 1 Day 15, Week 4, and Week 6.
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 6 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (before dose escalation), and at 2 weeks after each dose escalation (Week 4 for escalation from 240 mg to 280 mg exicorilant and Week 6 for escalation from 280 mg to 320 mg exicorilant).
Cmax of Plasma Exicorilant: Segment 2
Maximum observed concentration over the dosing interval. Patients in Arm B did not receive dose escalations, but they were sampled for pharmacokinetic analysis on the same time frame as the Arm A patients: Cycle 1 Day 15, Week 4, and Week 6.
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 6 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (before dose escalation), and at 2 weeks after each dose escalation (Week 4 for escalation from 240 mg to 280 mg exicorilant and Week 6 for escalation from 280 mg to 320 mg exicorilant).
AUC of Plasma Enzalutamide: Segment 2
AUC from time zero to 6 hours postdose (AUC0-6) calculated using linear up and log down method. Patients in Arm B did not receive dose escalations, but they were sampled for pharmacokinetic analysis on the same time frame as the Arm A patients: Cycle 1 Day 15, Week 4, and Week 6.
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 6 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (before dose escalation), and at 2 weeks after each dose escalation (Week 4 for escalation from 240 mg to 280 mg exicorilant and Week 6 for escalation from 280 mg to 320 mg exicorilant).
Cmax of Plasma Enzalutamide: Segment 2
Maximum observed concentration over the dosing interval. Patients in Arm B did not receive dose escalations, but they were sampled for pharmacokinetic analysis on the same time frame as the Arm A patients: Cycle 1 Day 15, Week 4, and Week 6.
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 6 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (before dose escalation), and at 2 weeks after each dose escalation (Week 4 for escalation from 240 mg to 280 mg exicorilant and Week 6 for escalation from 280 mg to 320 mg exicorilant).
AUC of Plasma N-Desmethyl Enzalutamide: Segment 2
AUC from time zero to 6 hours postdose (AUC0-6) calculated using linear up and log down method. Patients in Arm B did not receive dose escalations, but they were sampled for pharmacokinetic analysis on the same time frame as the Arm A patients: Cycle 1 Day 15, Week 4, and Week 6.
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 6 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (before dose escalation), and at 2 weeks after each dose escalation (Week 4 for escalation from 240 mg to 280 mg exicorilant and Week 6 for escalation from 280 mg to 320 mg exicorilant).
Cmax of Plasma N-Desmethyl Enzalutamide: Segment 2
Maximum observed concentration over the dosing interval. Patients in Arm B did not receive dose escalations, but they were sampled for pharmacokinetic analysis on the same time frame as the Arm A patients: Cycle 1 Day 15, Week 4, and Week 6.
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 6 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (before dose escalation), and at 2 weeks after each dose escalation (Week 4 for escalation from 240 mg to 280 mg exicorilant and Week 6 for escalation from 280 mg to 320 mg exicorilant).
AUC of Plasma Enzalutamide Carboxylic Acid: Segment 2
AUC from time zero to 6 hours postdose (AUC0-6) calculated using linear up and log down method. Patients in Arm B did not receive dose escalations, but they were sampled for pharmacokinetic analysis on the same time frame as the Arm A patients: Cycle 1 Day 15, Week 4, and Week 6.
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 6 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (before dose escalation), and at 2 weeks after each dose escalation (Week 4 for escalation from 240 mg to 280 mg exicorilant and Week 6 for escalation from 280 mg to 320 mg exicorilant).
Cmax of Plasma Enzalutamide Carboxylic Acid: Segment 2
Maximum observed concentration over the dosing interval. Patients in Arm B did not receive dose escalations, but they were sampled for pharmacokinetic analysis on the same time frame as the Arm A patients: Cycle 1 Day 15, Week 4, and Week 6.
Time frame: Predose and at time intervals up to 6 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (before dose escalation), and at 2 weeks after each dose escalation (Week 4 for escalation from 240 mg to 280 mg exicorilant and Week 6 for escalation from 280 mg to 320 mg exicorilant).
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Confirmed ORR is defined as the proportion of patients with measurable disease at Baseline who achieve a complete regression (CR) or partial regression (PR) by Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) / Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 (mRECIST) criteria, after confirmation.
Time frame: Up to 22 months
Number of Patients With ≥50% Reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)
Time frame: Up to 39 months
Time to PSA Progression
Assess the time to PSA progression defined as the first occurrence of 50% or greater increase in PSA levels. Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to PSA progression were calculated as (earliest date of PSA progression or censoring - date of first study treatment + 1)/30.4375.
Time frame: Up to 39 months
Percentage of Patients Who Are Progression-Free by PSA Criteria at 4, 6, and 12 Months
Assess the percentage of patients who are progression-free by PSA criteria, or death. PSA progression was defined as the first occurrence of 50% or greater increase in PSA levels. Values are Kaplan-Meier estimates of the patients progression free at the time points specified.
Time frame: 4, 6, and 12 months
Time to First Symptomatic Skeletal Event (SSE)
Assess the time to first SSE defined as symptomatic fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression. Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to first SSE were calculated as (earliest date of SSE or censoring - date of first study treatment + 1)/30.4375.
Time frame: Up to 39 months
Time to Progression by Radiographic Criteria
Assess radiographic progression free survival (PFS) defined as the time interval from first dose of study drug (exicorilant and/or enzalutamide) to the date when the first site of disease progression is found on computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or radionucleotide bone scan per PCWG3/mRECIST v1.1, or death whichever occurs first. The data values are Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: Up to 22 months
Percentage of Patients Who Are Progression-Free by Radiographic Criteria at 4, 6, and 12 Months
Assess the percentage of patients who are progression-free by radiographic criteria per PCWG3/RECIST v1.1, or death whichever occurs first. Values are Kaplan-Meier estimates of the patients progression free at the time points specified.
Time frame: 4, 6, and 12 months
Time to Progression by Clinical or Radiographic Criteria
Determine PFS by clinical or radiographic criteria, or death, whichever occurs first. Clinical progression was defined as treatment discontinuation due to disease progression by investigator assessment per PCWG3/mRECIST v1.1, or by PSA criteria. The data values are Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: Up to 22 months
Percentage of Patients Who Are Progression-Free by Clinical or Radiographic Criteria at 4, 6, and 12 Months
Assess the percentage of patients who are progression-free by clinical or radiographic measures at 4, 6, and 12 months. Values are Kaplan-Meier estimates of the patients progression free at the time points specified.
Time frame: 4, 6, and 12 months
Time to Progression by Clinical or Biochemical Criteria
Determine PFS by clinical criteria or biochemical criteria (defined as treatment discontinuation due to clinical progression by investigator assessment, or by PSA criteria) PCWG3/mRECIST v1.1, or death whichever occurs first. The data values are Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: Up to 33 months
Percentage of Patients Who Are Progression-Free by Clinical or Biochemical Criteria at 4, 6, and 12 Months
Assess the percentage of patients who are progression-free by clinical or biochemical criteria (defined as treatment discontinuation due to clinical progression by investigator assessment or by PSA criteria) PCWG3/mRECIST v1.1, or death whichever occurs first at 4, 6, and 12 months. Values are Kaplan-Meier estimates of the patients progression free at the time points specified.
Time frame: 4, 6, and 12 months
Duration of Response (DOR)
Determine the DOR as defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective tumor response to the time of radiographic progression (per investigator using PCWG3/mRECIST v1.1 criteria) or death from any cause on study, whichever occurs first. DOR was calculated as (earliest date of progression, death, or censoring - date of first documented objective response +1)/30.4375. The data values are Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: Up to 11 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Determine OS assessed as the time from the first dose of study drug (exicorilant and/or enzalutamide) to the date of death from any cause. The data values are Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: Up to 52 months