The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC injectable gel using cannula in participants seeking correction of age-related volume deficit in the mid-face.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
66
Participants had 1 cheek treated with JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC injectable gel with cannula.
Participants had 1 cheek treated with JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC injectable gel with a needle.
Skin Care and Laser Physicians of Beverly Hills
Los Angeles, California, United States
Art of Skin MD
Solana Beach, California, United States
Baumann Cosmetic and Research Institute
Miami, Florida, United States
Saint Louis University Dermatology
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Change From Baseline in Mid-Face Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) Score
The evaluating investigator (EI) assessed the participant's overall mid-face volume deficit for each cheek using a 6-point photonumeric scale, where: 0=None (moon face; fullness) \[best\] to 5=Severe (wasting) \[worst\]. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (Screening) to Month 1
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-Point Improvement (Decrease From Baseline) in MFVDS Score
The EI assessed the participant's overall mid-face volume deficit for each cheek using a 6-point photonumeric scale, where: 0=None (moon face; fullness) \[best\] to 5=Severe (wasting) \[worst\]. The percentage of participants who showed ≥1-point improvement (decrease in severity) from Baseline is reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Screening) to Month 1
Change From Baseline in FACE-Q Satisfaction With Cheeks Questionnaire Score
The participant completed the 5-item Satisfaction with Cheeks module of the FACE-Q questionnaire that evaluated various aspects of the cheeks including symmetry, smoothness, attractiveness, contour, and fullness using a 4-point scale where: 1=very dissatisfied to 4=very satisfied. The total score was transformed to a 0 to 100 point scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. The FACE-Q Satisfaction with Cheeks outcome was assessed by the participant overall and not by each cheek.
Time frame: Baseline (Screening) to Month 1
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is defined as an AE that initially occurred or increased in severity on or after the treatment start date.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of NY/NJ
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Rhoda S. Narins, MD, PC
White Plains, New York, United States
Aesthetic Solutions, PA
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Time frame: Up to 3 months