The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ENDOCUFF VISION® (caps with soft, about 1 cm long lateral feet of rubber ("Endocuff") to flatten the colon folds) on ADR in a real-life setting (general practices) and in a homogenous patient collective (screening colonoscopies only). It is a prospective randomized multi centric study, with participation of at least 10 study sites (private practice). The study is an inverstigator-initiated trial (IIT). Depending on the randomization (closed envelope), the patients are examined with the standard instruments without or with ENDOCUFF VISION®. Group 1: screening colonoscopy with standard colonoscopes with ENDOCUFF VISION® Group 2: screening colonoscopy with standard colonoscopes without cap
Colonoscopy is currently the best method for the detection of colon carcinomas and, as precursor, adenomas, since these can also be biopsied and removed. Therefore, the screening colonoscopy was introduced at the end of 2002 (covered by state insurance) from the age of 55. The main quality parameter for outcome quality is the adenoma detection rate (ADR), which correlates with the rate of the carcinomas prevented. However, since even smaller polyps, especially if they are flat or sunken, may be relevant for colon cancer development, the aim of colonoscopy should be to be able to recognize and remove as many adenomas as possible. There is a need to optimize the efficiency of screening colonoscopy by increasing the rate of adenoma detection, as it is known from many studies that approximately 15-30% of adenomas can be missed- even though the adenoma rate in the German screening colonoscopy register continues to increase over the years and currently stands at 28%. Previous studies on the increase of the adenoma detection rate by endoscopy concerning newer endoscope technologies including conventional caps have been almost entirely negative. For about 2 years, a newer version of ENDOCUFF VISION® caps (caps with soft, about 1 cm long lateral feet of rubber (Endocuff) to flatten the colon folds) is available which has already been used in about 8,000 colonoscopies in Germany and another 10,000 colonoscopies in Europe; there are no studies on this version of Endocuff caps. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ENDOCUFF VISION® in a real-life setting (general practices) and in a homogenous patient collective (screening colonoscopies only). It is a prospective randomized multi centric study, with participation of at least 10 study sites (private practice). The study is an inverstigator-initiated trial (IIT). A new technique for ADR improvement within colonoscopy can only be tested in a comparative study in two groups comparing the adenoma rate between the two groups. An independent gold standard does not exist in this sense, but the confirmation by the endoscopically taken histology serves as gold standard for the diagnosis adenoma. The alternative of double examinations (tandem colonoscopy) in each patient is in the setting of private practice not feasible. Depending on the randomization (closed envelope), the patients are examined with the standard instruments without or with ENDOCUFF VISION®. Group 1: screening colonoscopy with standard colonoscopes with ENDOCUFF VISION® Group 2: screening colonoscopy with standard colonoscopes without cap
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,382
Endocuff Vision cap on Standard colonoscope
Gastroenterologische Spezialpraxis am Wittenbergplatz
Berlin, Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis Hohenzollerndamm
Berlin, Germany
Gastroenterologie am Bayerischen Platz
Berlin, Germany
Praxis Dr. Mayr
Berlin, Germany
Praxis für Gastroenterologie in Berlin Reinickendorf
Berlin, Germany
Praxis Dr. med. Jens Aschenbeck
Berlin, Germany
Gastropraxis Eppendorfer Baum
Hamburg, Germany
Schwerpunktpraxis CCB Bergedorf
Hamburg, Germany
Magen-Darm-Zentrum, Facharztzentrum Eppendorf
Hamburg, Germany
Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) in the two study groups
Differences in ADR with or without the new disposable ENDOCUFF VISION® cap. Hypothesis: Endocuff Vision improves the adenoma detection rate (ADR) by about 25% compared to the comparison group.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
ADR (all adenoma/all patients)
ADR (all adenoma/all patients)
Time frame: 12 months
assessment of adenoma subgroups by location
differences in adenoma subgroups (between intestinal folds with good accessibility, between intestinal folds with poor accessibility, on top of intestinal fold, behind intestinal fold )
Time frame: 12 months
assessment of adenoma subgroups by size
measured by comparison with size of snare or forceps
Time frame: 12 months
assessment of adenoma subgroups by form
stem-based, broad-based, flat adenoma
Time frame: 12 months
assessment of adenoma subgroups by histology
loiw grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN), high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN), sessile serrated Adenoma (SSA), Carcinoma
Time frame: 12 months
assessment of adenoma subgroups by adjustability
adjustability of adenoma by colonoscope on a score scale from 1(very good) - 6 (poor)
Time frame: 12 months
assessment of adenoma subgroups by resection practice
resection of adenoma by biopsy, polypectomy, resection by forceps, none
Time frame: 12 months
Intervention times
duration of Intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
procedure technique
technical aspects of polypectomy/biopsy
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.