The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of various post-transplant treatment management approaches on clinical and immune biological responses after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell transplantation (AHSCT) for Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) as currently performed by the different treatment protocols used in routine clinical practice across Europe in various EBMT centres
NISSc-2 is a prospective observational study specifically designed to assess the effectiveness of various post-transplant treatment management approaches on clinical and immune biological responses after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell transplantation (AHSCT) for Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) as currently performed by the different treatment protocols used in routine clinical practice across Europe in various EBMT centres through the careful recording and analysis of routinely collected clinical and immune biological data, and specific data regarding post-transplant use of SSc active treatments, including: * Steroids, * SSc active treatments after AHSCT such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (oral or IV), methotrexate, polyclonal antibodies (such as ATG) or monoclonal antibodies (rituximab, belimumab or any others) as well as their respective dosage and duration of each treatment. These post-transplant treatments can be administered for various reasons, which can be specified by local investigators, such as per local protocol decision for maintenance therapy, or for disease progression with or without prior clinical response, during routine clinical follow-up. Patients who do not receive any post-transplant therapy will also be observed. Different protocols are used in the different centres, but it is not yet clear, which approach will be the most efficient and the safest. The role of stem cell purification with CD34-selection also needs to be determined prospectively. In addition, the EBMT Autoimmune Diseases and Immunobiology Working Parties developed and implemented guidelines for 'good laboratory practice' in relation to procurement, processing, storage and analysis of biological specimens for immune reconstitution studies in AD patients before, during and after AHSCT \[16\]. To follow post-transplant immune reconstitution according to ADWP GCP, results of routine analyses performed by centres under standardized conditions on available biological samples will be investigated in correlation to clinical outcome parameters. Every centre will follow its own local protocol for AHSCT, which usually refers to the recent update of the EBMT guidelines for AHSCT in autoimmune disease. We therefore specifically designed NISCC-II to prospectively capture various post-ASHCT management protocols and their effect on the observed clinical response after AHSCT.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
60
1st AHSCT
Badoglio Manuela- EBMT Paris Office
Paris, France
RECRUITINGProgression free survival (PFS),
defined as survival since AHSCT without evidence of progression of SSc.
Time frame: 2 years post transplant
Treatment related toxicity
Treatment related toxicity throughout the study period using WHO toxicity parameters (expressed as maximum grade toxicity per organ system, see appendix) Incidence of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SE) Neutrophil and platelet engraftment, defined as first day after transplantation with absolute neutrophil count \> 0.5 x 109/L and platelet count \>20 x 109/L (without platelet transfusion).
Time frame: 100 days post-transplant
100 days Treatment Related Mortality (100d TRM)
defined as any death during 100 days following transplant that cannot be attributed to progression or relapse of the disease
Time frame: 100 days post-transplant
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival
Time frame: 2 years post-transplant
Use of prednisone equivalent
Use of prednisolone equivalent \> 6 mg/day for more than 3 months
Time frame: 1 year and 2 years post-transplant
Use of immunosuppressive drugs
defined as use of any post-transplant immunosuppressive drugs (mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, oral or iv cyclosphosphamide or methotrexate) for either causes (maintenance therapy as per local protocol decision, SSc progression or relapse) and total duration of exposure to this post-transplant immunosuppressive treatment (average monthly daily dose and months duration)
Time frame: 2 years post-transplant
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Use of post-transplant biotherapies
defined as use of any monoclonal (i.e. anti CD20, anti-BLyS, alemtuzumab or polyclonal (i.e. ATG) antibodies for either causes (per local protocol decision, EBV infection or reactivation, progression or relapse) and total doses (in number and g/kg)
Time frame: 2 years post-transplant
Response to treatment
defined as any of the following changes * 25% improvement in mRSS and/or * ≥10% improvement in DLCO or FVC as compared to baseline (before mobilisation)
Time frame: 1 year and 2 years post-transplant
Infectious complications, CMV / EBV reactivation
Infectious complications, CMV / EBV reactivation
Time frame: 2 years post-transplant
Secondary autoimmune diseases and secondary malignancy
defined, autoimmune thrombocytopaenia, autoimmune thyroid disease, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, Evans' syndrome, acquired haemophila, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathy, autoimmune hepatitis, others) and secondary malignancy (EBV lymphoproliferative disorders, AML, MDS, skin cancers, and any others
Time frame: 2 years post-transplant
Immune reconstitution
Results of routine analysis performed by centres will be investigated in correlation to clinical outcomes parameters and will allow to follow post-transplant immune reconstitution according to ADWP GCP.
Time frame: 2 years post-transplant