MIN-117C03 is a 6-week, 3-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study to investigate the safety and efficacy of MIN-117 in male and female patients with Major Depressive Disorder, aged 18 to 65 years. Approximately 324 patients were to be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment arms, including placebo, 2.5 mg MIN-117, or 5.0 mg MIN-117, in a 2:1:1 ratio.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
360
5.0 mg MIN-117 administered as two MIN-117 2.5 mg capsules as a single dose once daily
2.5 mg MIN-117 administered as one MIN-117 2.5 mg capsule and one Placebo capsule as a single dose once daily
Placebo administered as two Placebo capsules as a single dose once daily
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a validated, physician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. The test consists of 10 items, each scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), for a total score of 60. Higher scores represent a more severe conditions. MADRS evaluates apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. The test exhibits high inter-rater reliability and its capacity to differentiate between responders and nonresponders to antidepressant treatment has been shown to be comparable to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.
Time frame: Week 6
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A)
Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) measures the severity of a participant's anxiety, based on 14 parameters, including anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, somatic complaints and behavior at the interview. The subject is asked to rate the gravity of each item using a 5-level scale - from 0 to 4, where 0 being not present and 4 being severe - and afterwards, the results are collated and tabulated to determine the severity of anxiety. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-25 mild to moderate severity, 25-30 moderate to severe, and \>30 indicates very severe. To implement the HAM-A, the acting clinician proceeds through the 14 items, evaluating each criterion independently in form of the five-point scale described above.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to the end of Week 6
Change in Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale (CGI-S)
The Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the participant's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with participants who have the same diagnosis: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" which is rated on the following scale: 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. The CGI-S will provide an overall clinician-determined summary measure that takes into account all available information including knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Woodland International Research Group, LLC
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Collaborative Neuroscience Network, LLC
Garden Grove, California, United States
Collaborative Neuroscience Network, LLC
Torrance, California, United States
Pacific Clinical Research Medical Group
Upland, California, United States
Atlanta Center for Medical Research
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Hassman Research Institute, LLC
Berlin, New Jersey, United States
Neurobehavioral Research, Inc, Cedarhurst, NY
Cedarhurst, New York, United States
Neuro-Behavorial Clinical Research Inc
Canton, Ohio, United States
Oregon Center for Clinical Investigations
Portland, Oregon, United States
FutureSearch Trials
Dallas, Texas, United States
...and 37 more locations
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 6
Change in Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I) at Week 6
The Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I) will provide an overall clinician-determined summary measure that takes into account all available information including knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. The CGI-I consists of a 7-point scale that evaluates the change from initiation of treatment similar to the Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale (CGI-S). This 7-point scale requires the clinician to assess how much the subject's illness has improved or worsened relative to a Baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse.
Time frame: Week 6