The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy of gefapixant (MK-7264) in reducing cough frequency as measured over a 24-hour period, and to determine the safety and tolerability of gefapixant. The primary hypothesis is that at least one dose of gefapixant is superior to placebo in reducing coughs per hour (over 24 hours) at Week 24.
This study will have a main 24-week treatment period and a 28-week extension period of treatment (total treatment period of 52 weeks). Participants at selected sites and countries who complete the main and extension study periods may consent to participate in an observational, 12-week, Off-treatment Durability Study Period. Any assessments conducted in the observational period will be exploratory.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
1,317
Placebo tablet administered orally BID
Gefapixant 15 mg tablet administered orally BID
Gefapixant 45 mg tablet administered orally BID
Model-Based Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of 24-Hour Coughs Per Hour at Week 24/Baseline
24-hour coughs per hour was defined as the average hourly cough frequency based on 24-hour sound recordings using a digital recording device (cough monitor). A longitudinal analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was applied to log-transformed cough data to determine geometric mean (GM) 24-hour coughs per hour at baseline and week 24. The GMR (Week 24 GM 24-hour coughs per hour divided by Baseline GM 24-hour coughs per hour) is reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Number of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE) During Treatment and Follow-up
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention.
Time frame: Up to 54 Weeks
Number of Participants Who Discontinued a Study Drug Due to an AE
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention.
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Model-Based GMR of Awake Coughs Per Hour at Week 24/Baseline
Awake coughs per hour was defined as the average hourly cough frequency while the participant is awake, based on a 24-hour interval of sound recordings using a digital recording device (cough monitor). ANCOVA model was applied to log-transformed cough data to determine GM of awake coughs per hour at baseline and week 24. The GMR (Week 24 GM awake coughs per hour divided by Baseline GM awake coughs per hour) is reported.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Phoenix Medical Group ( Site 0022)
Peoria, Arizona, United States
Pulmonary Associates, PA ( Site 0063)
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Clinical Research Consortium ( Site 0088)
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Allergy & Asthma Associates of SCV Research Center ( Site 0064)
San Jose, California, United States
Lenus Research & Medical Group Llc ( Site 0075)
Sweetwater, Florida, United States
Atlanta Allergy & Asthma Clinic PA ( Site 0029)
Stockbridge, Georgia, United States
Rush University Medical Center ( Site 0103)
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Healthcare Research Network LLC ( Site 0093)
Flossmoor, Illinois, United States
Abraham Research, PLLC ( Site 0107)
Fort Mitchell, Kentucky, United States
Paul A. Shapero, MD ( Site 0104)
Bangor, Maine, United States
...and 161 more locations
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a ≥1.3 Point Change From Baseline in the Leicester Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score at Week 24
The 19-item LCQ assessed the impact of chronic cough in three health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains (physical, social and psychological). The LCQ is calculated as a mean score for each domain ranging from 1 to 7, with a total score ranging from 3 to 21. Higher scores indicate better HRQoL. A clinically meaningful improvement from baseline in HRQoL was defined as ≥1.3-point increase in the LCQ total score at Week 24. The percentage of participants (logistic regression model-based) with a ≥1.3-point increase in the LCQ total score at Week 24 is presented.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a ≤-30% Change From Baseline in 24-hour Coughs Per Hour at Week 24
24-hour coughs per hour was defined as the average hourly cough frequency based on 24-hour sound recordings using a digital recording device (cough monitor). A clinically meaningful improvement from baseline is defined as a ≤-30% change (≥30% reduction) in 24-hour coughs per hour at week 24. The percentage of participants (logistic regression model-based) with a ≤ -30% change from baseline in 24-hour coughs per hour at Week 24 (≥30% reduction from baseline) is presented.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With ≤-1.3 Point Change From Baseline of Mean Weekly Cough Severity Diary (CSD) Total Score at Week 24
The 7-item CSD was used to record participants' daily cough frequency, cough intensity, and disruption due to cough. Each item was rated on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst); the total daily CSD score was the sum of these seven item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean weekly CSD total score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores collected during the week prior to each visit. The percentage of participants (logistic regression model-based) with a ≤-1.3 point change from baseline in CSD at Week 24 (or ≥1.3 point reduction from baseline) is reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With ≤-2.7 Point Change From Baseline of Mean Weekly CSD Total Score at Week 24
The 7-item CSD was used to record participants' daily cough frequency, cough intensity, and disruption due to cough. Each item was rated on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst); the total daily CSD score was the sum of these seven item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean weekly CSD total score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores collected during the week prior to each visit. The percentage of participants (logistic regression model-based) with a ≤-2.7 point change from baseline in CSD at Week 24 (or ≥2.7 point reduction from baseline) is reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a ≤-30 Millimeter (mm) Change From Baseline in Cough Severity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 24
The VAS is a single-item questionnaire with the response on a 100- point scale ranging from 0 ("No Cough") to 100 ("Extremely Severe Cough"). Mean weekly VAS score was defined as the average of the VAS scores collected during the week prior to each visit. The percentage of participants (logistic regression model-based) with a ≤-30 mm change from baseline in cough severity VAS score at Week 24 is reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24