The current study Is a split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial that was performed to investigate three dimensionally, using digital models and Cone Beam Computed Tomography imaging, the effect of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) on the rate of tooth movement in a canine retraction model.
Sample size calculation was carried out and resulted in enrolment of 18 female patients requiring bilateral upper first premolars extraction and canine retraction with maximum anchorage. The sample was recruited from the outpatient clinic of the Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. After placement of the fixed orthodontic appliance, leveling and alignment proceeded till 0.016" × 0.022" NiTi upper archwire. Indirect skeletal anchorage was then prepared using TADs inserted bilaterally between the upper 1st molar and 2nd premolar, and the patient was referred for upper 1st premolars extraction. Three months after extraction, 0.017" × 0.025" stainless-steel upper archwire was inserted and three vertically aligned MOPs were randomly allocated and performed in one side using a single TAD, while the other side served as control. The three MOPs were performed distal to the canine, equidistant in the extraction space. Bilateral canine retraction was then commenced using NiTi closing coil springs delivering 150 gms of force. Before leaving the clinic, a pain questionnaire was given to each patient. Data were collected from monthly upper impressions, which were poured into stone models and scanned to obtain sequential digital models (T0, T1, T2, T3 \& T4), in addition to pre- and post-retraction maxillary CBCT images. The assessed outcomes were the rate of canine retraction per month, the total distance travelled by the upper canines, first molars anchorage loss, tipping, torque and rotation of upper canines and first molars, canine root resorption and finally the pain related to MOP procedure. Statistical analysis was performed on the gathered data and results were withdrawn.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
36
Minor surgical procedure including performance of limited and shallow perforations of the cortical plate of bone to increase the expression of inflammatory cytokines, hence accelerating orthodontic tooth movement.
Rate of maxillary canine retraction
distance (mm) moved by the canine distally per month
Time frame: 4 months of canine retraction
Maxillary first molar anchorage loss
anchorage loss (mesial movement) of the maxillary first molar occuring after 4 months of canine retraction.
Time frame: 4 months of canine retraction
Maxillary canine tipping, torque and rotation
change in the three dimensional axial inclination (tipping, torque and rotation) of the maxillary canine after 4 months of retraction
Time frame: 4 months of canine retraction
Maxillary first molar tipping, torque and rotation
change in the three-dimensional axial inclination (tipping, torque and rotation) of the maxillary first molar after 4 months of canine retraction.
Time frame: 4 months of canine retraction
Maxillary canine root resorption
amount of canine root resorption occurred after 4 moths of retraction
Time frame: 4 months of canine retraction
Pain caused by the micro-osteoperforation procedure
Pain assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-10) assessed immediately after the micro-osteoperforation (MOP) procedure, 1 day, 3 days and 1 week after the MOP procedure. 0 pain score: no pain, (1-3) pain score: mild pain, (3-6) pain scores: moderate pain, (7-10) pain score: severe pain.
Time frame: 1 week after the micro-osteoperforation procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.