Neonatal sepsis has a high risk of morbidity and mortality. The current WHO and national guidelines recommend antibiotics to which resistance is reported in neonatal populations, although the available data is limited. Research on alternative empirical regimens for neonatal sepsis which are affordable, safe and cost-effective, with a step-down oral option, is needed. AMR is an issue of global public health concern and is one of the WHO's global health priority areas. Understanding the benefits, risks, MIC capacity and PK of fosfomycin will influence global policy on the case management of neonates with sepsis in Kenya and international settings.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a major issue in global health. Despite progress in the reduction of under 5 mortality rates in recent decades, the proportion of neonatal deaths occurring within this age group has increased, with almost one quarter of all neonatal deaths occurring due to serious bacterial infection. Common bacteria causing neonatal sepsis are now exhibiting widespread resistance to several classes of antibiotics. There is an urgent need to discover new, effective treatments and re-evaluate existing therapeutic agents to treat infections potentially caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens. Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) predominate as the cause of neonatal sepsis, and are increasingly associated with high rates of resistance to the currently recommended WHO empirical therapy regimen of ampicillin/penicillin and gentamicin. There is therefore a need to develop an updated empiric regimen with improved efficacy in the context of increasing MDR sepsis in neonates. New antimicrobials under development will be expensive once licensed, and there are currently virtually no planned trials to assess their efficacy in neonates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). One potential strategy is utilising an existing off-patent (and therefore affordable) antibiotic available in intravenous and oral formulations - fosfomycin. Fosfomycin has a wide spectrum of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria causing neonatal sepsis. It is mainly used for resistant urinary tract infections in adults, but has licenced neonatal and paediatric doses in Europe (though dosing regimens vary between countries). Both oral and IV formulations are available. A large clinical trial to assess the efficacy of a fosfomycin plus an aminoglycoside combination (compared to the current WHO recommended ampicillin and gentamicin) is anticipated, including sites in Kenya. The ultimate aim is for fosfomycin to be included in the WHO Essential Medicines List for children (EMLc) and be available for use in developing countries, where rates of resistance to ampicillin and gentamicin have been estimated at over 40%. The first steps before this trial are to clarify the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety profile of fosfomycin in neonates, as well as generating further information regarding local patterns of bacterial susceptibility to fosfomycin. The aim of this study is to fulfil both these steps. Fosfomycin (IV and oral) PK will be investigated among 60 babies admitted to hospital and being treated for presumed sepsis; administered alongside the standard antibiotics. Another 60 babies receiving standard treatment only (without PK sampling) will be monitored in the same way to compare adverse events. In the laboratory at CGMR-C, previously archived bacterial isolates will be tested for their sensitivity to fosfomycin.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
120
Fosfomycin will initially be administered IV for at least 48 hours together with standard care (ampicillin + gentamicin). Then, once babies are tolerating oral feeds and clinically improved, fosfomycin will be changed to oral administration to complete a total of 7 days of fosfomycin (or until the baby is discharged).
Two PK samples will be taken after each of the first IV and oral doses, with sampling times allocated within possible early (5, 10 or 60 minutes) and late (2, 4 or 8 hours) time-points after starting the IV and PO formulations; then again together with biochemistry after 7 days for those babies whom remain as inpatients.
For assessment of susceptibility patterns in bowel flora, we will systematically assess all admission and discharge nappy swabs.
KEMRI / Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Kilifi, Kenya
Pharmacokinetic disposition and absorption parameters of IV and oral fosfomycin in neonates with clinical sepsis
Fosfomycin Clearance (CL)
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of enrolment, an expected average of 7 days
Pharmacokinetic disposition and absorption parameters of IV and oral
Fosfomycin Volume of Distribution
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of enrolment, an expected average of 7 days
Pharmacokinetic disposition and absorption parameters of IV and oral
Fosfomycin Oral Bioavailability (F)
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of enrolment, an expected average of 7 days
Difference between the groups in mean 48-hour plasma sodium concentrations
Biochemistry will be checked at 48 hours for participants in both groups
Time frame: 48 hours
Difference between the groups in mean 7-day plasma sodium concentrations
Biochemistry will be checked at 7 days for participants in both groups
Time frame: 7 days
Difference between groups in the rate of adverse events (any grade) to 28 days after enrolment in the study
Neonates will be reviewed every day by study clinicians, working together with the hospital team. All adverse events will be documented and reported in both arms.
Time frame: from patient randomization to visit D28
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.