Part A of this trial is a multi-center, prospective, double-blinded, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Part A will evaluate PEMF treatment compared to sham treatment in patients with painful diabetic distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy (DSPN) when treatment is administered 30 minutes twice daily through a 120-day period (4 months). Part B is a 8-month open-label active treatment extension period designed to collect longer-term data on pain, medication use, quality of life and safety (Part B).Part B of this trial is a an extension period upon completion of Part A.
Eligible subjects will be entered into a 14-day ePRO diary run-in period to collect average baseline pain scores related to their diabetic neuropathy in the lower extremities, diary compliance, and analgesic consumption (maintenance and prn prescribed peripheral neuropathic pain medication pill counts). Subjects will collect electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) data each morning around the same time during the run-in period. Subjects will return to the clinic at Baseline (Day 0) for review of eligibility, diary compliance, average baseline diabetic neuropathic pain score of ≥4 and \<9, and review of stable analgesic pain consumption profile during the 14-day run-in period. Qualified subjects based on diary compliance and average pain score will be randomized 1:1 (active: sham) and will be instructed to self-treat twice daily for 120 days. Subjects will record electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) data following each morning treatment for 120 days. Subjects consenting to distal thigh and distal leg skin biopsies during the Screening visit will have biopsies collected and sent to the central laboratory for assessment. All subjects will have baseline assessments conducted. Subjects will receive a telephone call at Day 7 to ensure compliance to treatment and diary completion, provide follow-up information on the biopsy sites (if applicable), complete a blinding assessment as well as be assessed for safety and concomitant medication changes. At Month 1 subjects will return to the clinic for evaluation of safety, concomitant medication changes, review device usage and ePRO diary completion, and Patient Global Impression (PGI). Treatment satisfaction will also be assessed. At Month 2 subjects will return to the clinic for evaluation of safety, concomitant medication changes, treatment satisfaction, review of device usage (reports will be supplied to the site) and ePRO diary completion, quality of life outcomes (WPAIQ and NeuroQoL), Patient Global Impression (PGI), and interim visit measurements of SPP. At Month 3, subjects will return to the clinic for evaluation of safety, concomitant medication changes, review device usage (reports will be supplied to the site) and ePRO diary completion, and Patient Global Impression (PGI). Treatment satisfaction will also be assessed. At Month 4 (end of Part A / start of Part B), subjects will return to the clinic for evaluation of safety, treatment satisfaction, review of device usage (reports will be supplied to the site), HbA1c, concomitant medication changes, weight, quality of life outcomes (WPAIQ and NeuroQoL), PGI, final measurements of SPP, NCS, QST and be assessed to determine their Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score. Those subjects who consented and had biopsies collected at the Enrollment visit, will have their end of study biopsies during this visit and samples sent directly to the central laboratory for assessment. Subjects will return the study device and complete a blinding assessment. Subjects that complete Part A will continue into the open-label extension period (Part B). All subjects will be reconsented if not completed at a prior visit and given an open-label active device. Subjects will record ePRO data for one week prior to the Month 6, 8, 10, and 12 visits following each morning treatment. Subjects will be reminded of the150-day (Month 5) phone call. At Month 5, subjects will receive a telephone call to ensure compliance to treatment, and to be assessed for safety and concomitant medication changes. At Month 6, subjects will receive a telephone call to ensure treatment compliance and collection of diary data, and to assess safety and concomitant medication changes. At Month 7, subjects will receive a telephone call to ensure treatment compliance, and to assess safety and concomitant medication changes. At Month 8, subjects will return to the clinic for evaluation of safety, measure QST, treatment satisfaction, review of device usage and collection of diary data, concomitant medication changes, quality of life outcomes (NeuroQoL), and PGI. At Month 9, subjects will receive a telephone call to ensure treatment compliance, and to assess safety and concomitant medication changes. At Month 10, subjects will receive a telephone call to ensure treatment compliance and collection of diary data, and to assess safety and concomitant medication changes. At Month 11, subjects will receive a telephone call to ensure treatment compliance, and to assess safety and concomitant medication changes. At Month 12 (end of open-label treatment extension), subjects will return to the clinic for evaluation of safety, weight, QST, NCS, TCNSS, PGI, treatment satisfaction, review of device usage and collection of diary data, concomitant medication changes, quality of life outcomes (NeuroQoL), and will return the study device. Subjects who consented and had biopsies collected at the 4 Month visit, will have their end of study biopsies performed during this visit.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
182
Treatment with active Provant Therapy System
Treatment with inactive Provant Therapy System
Physician's Research Group
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Valley Clinical Research
Northridge, California, United States
Northern California Research
Sacramento, California, United States
Diabetes Research Center
Tustin, California, United States
Mountain View Clinical Research
Denver, Colorado, United States
Lake Internal Medicine Associates
Eustis, Florida, United States
Clinical Physiology Associates
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Spotlight Research Center
Miami, Florida, United States
Clinical Research of Central Florida
Winter Haven, Florida, United States
River Birch Research Alliance, LLC
Blue Ridge, Georgia, United States
...and 8 more locations
Change in Pain Intensity
Absolute change in pain intensity as measured by the 11-point, numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) (0-10; where 0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain).
Time frame: Baseline through 4 months
Patients With 2 Point or 30% Reduction in Pain at 4 Months
Percentage of patients who have either a 2 point or 30% reduction in (pain) NPRS at 4 Months. Absolute change in pain intensity as measured by the 11-point, numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) (0-10; where 0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain).
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months
Patient Global Impression at 4 Months
Patient Global Impression at 4 Months. The question assesses change since the start of the study on a 7-point scale ("Since the start of the study, how has your diabetic neuropathy in your legs changed?"), and to score it as either very much worse, much worse, minimally worse, no change, minimally improved, much improved or very much improved.
Time frame: Baseline through 4 months.
Time to 30% or 2-point Reduction in NPRS, Whichever Comes First, Through 4 Months
Absolute change in pain intensity as measured by the 11-point, numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) (0-10; where 0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). Number of participants achieving a 30% or 2-point reduction at or prior to weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and 17 are displayed below.
Time frame: Through 4 months
Change in Neuropathy Related Quality of Life (NeuroQoL) Between Baseline and End of Treatment at 4 Months.
A validated set of health-related quality of life measures that are domain specific.Subjects will completed 6 domains: (1) Pain, (2) Lost/Reduced Feeling, (3) Diffuse Sensory Motor Symptoms, (4) Restrictions in Activities of Daily Living, (5) Disruptions in Social Relationships, and (6) Emotional Distress.The short forms were completed by the subject at the Enrollment Visit and end of study visit (Day 121). Each question in the domain was rated on a symptom scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time) and a bothersome scale from 1 (none) to 3 (very much). The total score for the domain was calculated by multiplying the symptom score by the bothersome score. The scale range is from 1 to 15 where the minimum (best/least symptomatic) score is 1 and the maximum (worst/most symptomatic) score is 15. The mean change from Baseline to month 4 is displayed below.
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months
Change is Skin Perfusion Pressure (SPP) for Baseline to End of Treatment at 4 Months
SPP was measured at two locations on each foot (dorsal right and left and plantar right and left). Mean change displayed from Baseline to 4-months displayed below. SPP measures pressure in mmHg; an increase in pressure is favorable. * Normal SPP: 50 mmHg to 100 mmHg * Marginal Ischemia SPP: 30 mmHg to 50 mmHg * Critical Limb Ischemia / PAD SPP: \< 30 mmHg
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months
Changes in Nerve Conduction Studies of Velocity Between Baseline and End of Treatment at 4 Months.
Using the NC-stat DPNCheck, the sural nerve conduction velocity was recorded on the right and left legs. An increase in velocity would suggest DPN improvement. The mean change from Baseline to 4-months is displayed below.
Time frame: Baseline to 4 Months
Changes in Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Between Baseline and End of Treatment at 4 Months.
Contact thermal stimulation will be delivered using the Medoc Ltd. Q-Sense system to assess cool sensation threshold, warm sensation threshold and heat pain threshold modalities using the method of limits. Within the cool and warm sensation modalities, the trial is repeated 4 times on each foot and 3 times on each foot for heat pain threshold modality. The cool thermal testing will be conducted prior to the warm and heat pain thermal testing. Mean change from baseline to 4-months displayed below.
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months
Changes in Nerve Conduction Studies of Amplitude Between Baseline and End of Treatment at 4 Months.
Using the NC-stat DPNCheck, the sural nerve conduction amplitude was recorded on the right and left legs. An increase in amplitude would suggest DPN improvement. The mean change from Baseline to 4-months is displayed below.
Time frame: Baseline to 4 Months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.