This was a study to investigate the potential clinical benefit of G1T38 as an oral therapy in combination with osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The study was an open-label design, planned to consist of 2 parts: a safety, pharmacokinetic, and dose-finding portion (Part 1), and a randomized portion (Part 2). Both parts were to include 3 study phases: Screening Phase, Treatment Phase, and Survival Follow-up Phase. The Treatment Phase began on the day of first dose with study treatment and completes at the Post-Treatment Visit. Approximately, 144 patients were planned to be enrolled in the study.
Part 2, the Phase 2 part of the study, was not conducted due to changes in corporate strategy. There were no safety signals identified in Phase 1/Part 1 that would have precluded the conduct of Part 2. As a result, 30 out of the planned 144 patients were enrolled. All tumor assessments were conducted by the Investigators or site radiologist. In order to reduce the burden to the patients, data of overall survival (OS) were no longer required (since 29 January 2020). No OS analysis was conducted for Part 1 due to limited data in Part 1. PK data for Cohorts 4 (150 BID) and 5 (200 BID) were not analyzed as they were deemed unnecessary, as the PK data from Cohorts 1-3 were sufficient to achieve the secondary study objective of assessing the effect of osimertinib on PK parameters of G1T38.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
CDK 4/6 inhibitor
EGFR TKI; 80 mg
Beverly Hills Cancer Center
Beverly Hills, California, United States
UCLA Medical Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology/Clinical Research Unit
Santa Monica, California, United States
St Joseph Heritage Healthcare
Santa Rosa, California, United States
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Fox Building, Suite 200 G
Miami, Florida, United States
Mofitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, United States
Univ. of Michigan Hospitals
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Virginia Cancer Specialists
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Froedtert Hospital & the Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Dose Limiting Toxicity
The percentage of patients experiencing DLTs in Part 1 of the study in each cohort, including: * Grade 4 neutropenia * ≥ Grade 3 neutropenic infection/febrile neutropenia * Grade 4 thrombocytopenia * ≥ Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding * ≥ Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity (additional criteria for nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or fatigue: lasting \> 5 days with maximal medical management) * Liver function test abnormalities meeting Hy's Law criteria (aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\] or alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\] ≥ 3 × upper limit of normal \[ULN\] and total bilirubin ≥ 2 × ULN).
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day -16 to Cycle 1 Day 28
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Median time (months) and 95% CI from date of first dose of study drug/randomization until date of documented disease progression or death due to any cause. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1.1 guidelines for tumor assessments were used to determine progression. Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Time frame: 36 months
Best Overall Tumor Response
The percentage of patients who fall into each category of Best overall response (BOR) as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1.1 guidelines. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. When no imaging/measurement is done, the patient is not evaluable (NE); and if only a subset of lesion measurements are made, usually the case is also considered NE.
Time frame: 21 months
Pharmacokinetics of G1T38 and Metabolite G1T30: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
The observed peak plasma concentration determined from the plasma concentration versus time data.
Time frame: Part 1, Cycle 1 Day -16 to Day -2.
Pharmacokinetics of G1T38 and Metabolite G1T30: Area Under Curve - Plasma Concentration (AUC) Infinity
Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity using the linear-up log-down trapezoidal rule.
Time frame: Part 1, Cycle 1 Day -16 to Day -2.
Pharmacokinetics of G1T38 and Metabolite G1T30: Plasma: Terminal Half Life (T1/2)
Terminal half-life, defined as 0.693 divided by the terminal phase rate constant by λz , determined by linear regression of at least 3 points on the terminal phase of the log-linear plasma concentration-time curve.
Time frame: Part 1, Cycle 1 Day -16 to Day -2.
Pharmacokinetics of G1T38: Plasma - Volume of Distribution
Volume of distribution in the terminal elimination phase, calculated as: Vz/F = (CL/F)/λz
Time frame: Part 1, Cycle 1 Day -16 to Day -2.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.