The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the sedative, and analgesic effects of intranasal (IN) Dexmedetomidine (DEX) in children presenting to a Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) who undergo conscious sedation for reduction of closed distal forearm fractures when compared to those receiving intravenous (IV) Ketamine. The secondary objective is to compare each sedation technique for safety and procedural outcomes.
Distal Forearm fractures are often are displaced requiring conscious sedation for closed reduction in the Emergency Department. Our institution's current standard of care consists of IN Fentanyl for baseline control of pain, and for those fractures requiring reduction; typically IV Ketamine is utilized. Ketamine is typically well tolerated but is not without concerns including hypertension, vomiting, and the rare but serious complication of laryngospasm. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) offers a possible alternative to IV Ketamine. DEX has been used safely in the critical care setting for both pediatrics and adults. It has been well documented as being quite effective in sedation, amnesia and analgesia. Using IN DEX for PED procedural sedation has the potential to obviate the need for IV placement and may offer a better conscious sedation profile than Ketamine with respect to sedation, analgesia, and adverse outcomes. Our overall project would be to assess the efficiency of IN DEX in comparison to IV Ketamine, for proper sedation and analgesic coverage for children undergoing closed reduction of distal forearm fractures.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Evaluate sedative and analgesic effects of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine
Evaluate sedative and analgesic effects of Intravenous Ketamine
Phoenix Children's Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Evaluate the sedative effects of intranasal Dexmedetomidine in children undergoing conscious sedation for closed distal forearm fracture reduction compared to intravenous Ketamine
The sedative effects of intranasal Dexmedetomidine will be compared to intravenous ketamine for conscious sedation via the Michigan Sedation Scoring (MSS) system.
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluate the analgesic effects of intranasal Dexmedetomidine in children undergoing conscious sedation for closed distal forearm fracture reduction compared to intravenous Ketamine
The analgesic effects of intranasal Dexmedetomidine will be compared to intravenous ketamine for conscious sedation using either the Wong-Baker scale (FACES) or Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) depending on patient age and developmental status
Time frame: 12 months
Compare each sedation technique for time to sedation onset
Time in minutes and seconds from administration of sedative agent until Michigan Sedation Scoring (MSS) is 3 or higher.
Time frame: 12 months
Compare each sedation technique for length of sedation
Time in minutes and seconds from when Michigan Sedation Scoring (MSS) is 3 or higher until MSS is less than 3.
Time frame: 12 months
Compare each sedation technique for length of ED stay
Time in minutes and seconds from presentation to ED to discharge
Time frame: 12 months
Compare each sedation technique for need for additional doses of medications for analgesia or sedation
Will measure if any unplanned doses of sedatives or analgesics are required in either treatment arm.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 12 months
Compare each sedation technique for Vital sign abnormalities
Review vital signs following administration of either study drug to see if any vital signs were abnormal. Abnormal vital signs will be defined as hear rate, respiratory rate, or blood pressure above or below one standard deviation for age derived norms.
Time frame: 12 months
Compare each sedation technique for need for respiratory interventions
Measure if any respiratory interventions were required during the patient's ED stay. Respiratory interventions defined as need for oxygen by any device.
Time frame: 12 months
Compare each sedation technique for rate of vomiting
Describe the incidence (yes/no) of vomiting at any point after administration of either study drug to ED discharge.
Time frame: 12 months
Compare each sedation technique for procedural success rate
Describe the successful reduction of orthopedic injuries in each study arm. Successful reduction defined as patient able to be discharged and not requiring admission, surgery, or secondary reduction attempts.
Time frame: 12 months
Compare each sedation technique for patient family satisfaction
Describe the family satisfaction with each conscious sedation technique. Measured by brief survey given to the family upon consent for the study.
Time frame: 12 months