FORT-2 is designed to evaluate safety, efficacy, RP2D and PK of rogaratinib in combination with atezolizumab in patients with untreated FGFR-positive urothelial carcinoma. The study originally comprised two separate parts: Phase 1b (Part A) and Phase 2 (Part B). The study parts differ in design, objectives, and treatment. The primary objectives of this Phase 1b study (Part A) are to determine the safety, tolerability, RP2D and pharmacokinetics of rogaratinib in combination with atezolizumab in these patients. The primary objective of the Part B is to compare progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST v1.1 of rogaratinib in combination with atezolizumab over placebo in combination with atezolizumab in untreated patients with FGFR-positive locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Of note, patients who participate in Part A are not allowed to participate in Part B. Part B will be initiated once the data from Part A supports continuation of the study, even if this occurs prior to primary completion of Part A. The sponsor may decide not to continue the study as a whole after completion of Part A if the data do not support further development. Part B of the study will no longer be conducted.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
37
Part A:Rogaratinib will be administered orally until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. The starting dose of 800 mg b.i.d. will be confirmed using a dose selection design.
Part A: A fixed dose of 1200 mg atezolizumab will be administered through intravenous (i.v.) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal.
University of Arizona Cancer Center
Tucson, Arizona, United States
UChicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center - Hyde Park
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute - Detroit Headquarters
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder
Vienna, State of Vienna, Austria
Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities(DLTs)
Time frame: Up to 21 days
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: up to 90 days after the last study medication intake, an average of 60 days
Number of Participants With Drug-related TEAEs
Time frame: up to 90 days after the last study medication intake, an average of 60 days
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events(TESAEs)
Time frame: up to 90 days after the last study medication intake, an average of 60 days
Objective Response Rate(ORR)
Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Patients for whom best overall tumor response was not CR or PR, as well as patients without any post-baseline tumor assessment were considered non-responders. For all patients, the best overall tumor response was determined locally by investigators using the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) criteria. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Time frame: Up to 5 months
Maximal Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Rogaratinib
Time frame: At cycle 1 Day 1
Area Under the Rogaratinib Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC)
Time frame: At cycle 1 Day 1, 0-t(last)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH Elisabethinen
Linz, Upper Austria, Austria
Uniklinikum Salzburg - Landeskrankenhaus
Salzburg, Austria
Universitätsklinikum AKH Wien
Vienna, Austria
Institut Bergonie - Unicancer Nouvelle Aquitaine
Bordeaux, France
Centre Oscar Lambret - Lille
Lille, France
...and 20 more locations