This study will evaluate pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of etrolizumab in pediatric patients of 4 to \<18 years of age with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) or with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
24
Etrolizumab was administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection as described for each treatment arm.
Hôpital Enfants Reine Fabiola
Brussels, Belgium
Gabinet Lekarski, Bartosz Korczowski
Rzeszów, Poland
Centrum Zdrowia MDM
Warsaw, Poland
Hospital Niño Jesus; Servicio de Pediatria - Gastrenterologia y Nutricion
Madrid, Spain
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Etrolizumab After First and Last Dose During the Randomized Treatment Phase
Etrolizumab concentrations in all pharmacokinetics (PK) samples were measured using a validated assay method. Non-compartmental analysis methods were employed to calculate PK parameters.
Time frame: Arm Etro Q4W: Day 1, 84 and Arm Etro Q8W: Day 1, 56
Time to Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Etrolizumab After First and Last Dose During the Randomized Treatment Phase
Etrolizumab concentrations in all pharmacokinetics (PK) samples were measured using a validated assay method. Non-compartmental analysis methods were employed to calculate PK parameters.
Time frame: Arm Etro Q4W: Days 1, 84 and Arm Etro Q8W: Days 1, 56
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Within the Last Dosing Interval (AUC-tau) of Etrolizumab During the Randomized Treatment Phase
Etrolizumab concentrations in all pharmacokinetics (PK) samples were measured using a validated assay method. Non-compartmental analysis methods were employed to calculate PK parameters.
Time frame: Arm Etro Q4W: Days 56, 84, 88, 98, 112 and Arm Etro Q8W: Day 56, 60, 70, 84, 88, 98, 112
Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Etrolizumab After Last Dose During the Randomized Treatment Phase
Etrolizumab concentrations in all pharmacokinetics (PK) samples were measured using a validated assay method. Non-compartmental analysis methods were employed to calculate PK parameters.
Time frame: Arm Etro Q4W: Days 84, 88, 98, 112, 126, 140, 168 and Arm Etro Q8W: Days 56, 60, 70, 84, 88, 98, 112, 126, 140, 168
Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Etrolizumab at the End of Each Dosing Interval During the Randomized Treatment Phase
Etrolizumab concentrations in all pharmacokinetics (PK) samples were measured using a validated assay method.
Time frame: Arm Etro Q4W: Predose on Days 28, 56, 84, 112 and Arm Etro Q8W: Predose on Days 56, 112
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Royal Manchester Childrens Hospital
Manchester, United Kingdom
Percentage of Baseline Absolute Numbers of Beta7 Receptor-Expressing Gut Homing CD3, CD4, and CD8 T Cells and CD19 B Cells With Unoccupied Beta7 Receptors in Peripheral Blood, Assessed by Flow Cytometry, During the Randomized Treatment Phase
Target engagement of etrolizumab was assessed via measurement of Beta7 receptor occupancy on Beta7 receptor-expressing gut homing lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood, including CD3, CD4, and CD8 T cells and CD19 B cells, using qualified flow cytometry methods. A decrease to 0% of baseline (BL) in median absolute cell counts of Beta7 receptor-expressing T and B cell subsets with unoccupied Beta7 receptors following etrolizumab treatment indicated maximal receptor occupancy by etrolizumab.
Time frame: Predose (dosing days only) at Baseline (Day 1) and on Days 4, 56, 84, 98, and 112 (Treatment Period), and Days 126, 140, and 168 (Follow-Up Period)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events by Highest Severity Grade, Assessed According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0), During the Randomized Treatment Phase
All adverse events (AEs) were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Any AE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to AE. Not all grades are appropriate for all AEs; some AEs have fewer than 5 options. The terms "severe" and "serious" are not synonymous and are independently assessed for each AE. Multiple occurrences of AEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Time frame: From Baseline until 12 weeks (Q4W arm only) or 16 weeks (Q8W arm only) after the last dose of study drug during the randomized treatment phase (up to 24 weeks)
Number of Participants With Serious Infection-Related Adverse Events During the Randomized Treatment Phase
Serious infection-related AEs were assessed using NCI-CTCAE v4.0.
Time frame: From Baseline until 12 weeks (Q4W arm only) or 16 weeks (Q8W arm only) after the last dose of study drug during the randomized treatment phase (up to 24 weeks)
Number of Participants With Hypersensitivity Reactions During the Randomized Treatment Phase
Hypersensitivity reactions were assessed using NCI-CTCAE v4.0.
Time frame: From Baseline until 12 weeks (Q4W arm only) or 16 weeks (Q8W arm only) after the last dose of study drug during the randomized treatment phase (up to 24 weeks)
Number of Participants With Malignancies During the Randomized Treatment Phase
Malignancies were assessed using NCI-CTCAE v4.0.
Time frame: From Baseline until 12 weeks (Q4W arm only) or 16 weeks (Q8W arm only) after the last dose of study drug during the randomized treatment phase (up to 24 weeks)
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Etrolizumab at Baseline and Post-Baseline During the Randomized Treatment Phase
Participants were considered to be etrolizumab anti-drug antibody (ADA) positive if they were ADA negative or had missing data at Baseline (BL) but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (i.e., treatment-induced ADA positive), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more postbaseline samples was at least 0.60 titer unit greater than the titer of the baseline sample (i.e., treatment-enhanced ADA positive); these ADA positive responses are summarized together (induced + enhanced) in the 'treatment-emergent ADA positive' category. Participants were considered to be ADA negative if they were ADA negative or had missing data at Baseline (BL) and all postbaseline samples were negative (i.e., treatment-emergent ADA negative).
Time frame: Predose (dosing days only) on Days 1, 28, 84, 112, and 168 (up to the end of the randomized treatment phase at Week 24)
Long-Term Safety of Etrolizumab: Number of Participants With Adverse Events by Highest Severity Grade, Assessed According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0
All adverse events (AEs) were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Any AE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to AE. Not all grades are appropriate for all AEs; some AEs have fewer than 5 options. The terms "severe" and "serious" are not synonymous and are independently assessed for each AE. Multiple occurrences of AEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Time frame: OLE Period: From end of Week 24 to end of 12-week safety follow-up (up to 195 weeks); PML Period: After completion of safety follow up in Randomized Treatment phase or after completion of safety follow up after OLE treatment, up to approximately 92 weeks
Long-Term Safety of Etrolizumab: Number of Participants With Serious Infection-Related Adverse Events
Serious infection-related AEs were assessed using NCI-CTCAE v4.0.
Time frame: OLE Period: From end of Week 24 to end of 12-week safety follow-up (up to 195 weeks); PML Period: After completion of safety follow up in Randomized Treatment phase or after completion of safety follow up after OLE treatment, up to approximately 92 weeks
Long-Term Safety of Etrolizumab: Number of Participants With Hypersensitivity Reactions
Hypersensitivity reactions were assessed using NCI-CTCAE v4.0.
Time frame: OLE Period: From end of Week 24 to end of 12-week safety follow-up (up to 195 weeks); PML Period: After completion of safety follow up in Randomized Treatment phase or after completion of safety follow up after OLE treatment, up to approximately 92 weeks
Long-Term Safety of Etrolizumab: Number of Participants With Malignancies
Malignancies were assessed using NCI-CTCAE v4.0.
Time frame: OLE Period: From end of Week 24 to end of 12-week safety follow-up (up to 195 weeks); PML Period: After completion of safety follow up in Randomized Treatment phase or after completion of safety follow up after OLE treatment, up to approximately 92 weeks
Long-Term Safety of Etrolizumab: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Etrolizumab at Baseline and Post-Baseline
Participants were considered to be etrolizumab anti-drug antibody (ADA) positive if they were ADA negative or had missing data at Baseline (BL) but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (i.e., treatment-induced ADA positive), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more postbaseline samples was at least 0.60 titer unit greater than the titer of the baseline sample (i.e., treatment-enhanced ADA positive); these ADA positive responses are summarized together (induced + enhanced) in the 'treatment-emergent ADA positive' category. Participants were considered to be ADA negative if they were ADA negative or had missing data at Baseline (BL) and all postbaseline samples were negative (i.e., treatment-emergent ADA negative).
Time frame: Predose (dosing days only) at Baseline (Day 1), Days 28, 84, and 112, Weeks 24, 36, 72, and 120, and every 12 weeks thereafter for up to 4.25 years
Number of Participants With Confirmed Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) During the Post-Treatment PML Monitoring Phase
The safety surveillance PML-monitoring phase (no etrolizumab treatment) consisted of telephone calls approximately every 6 months with administration of the protocol's PML Subjective Checklist. If there were any signs or symptoms suggestive of PML identified on this subjective checklist during the telephone call, the participant was asked to come into the clinic for a neurologic examination. The protocol's PML Algorithm was followed for any suspected case of PML, and any confirmed case of PML would be reported as a serious adverse event.
Time frame: PML Period: After completion of safety follow up in Randomized Treatment period or after completion of safety follow up after OLE treatment, up to approximately 92 weeks