This study will explore if there are any difference in functional outcomes between two different surgical procedures for total knee replacement: robot-assisted versus manually-executed total knee arthroplasty.
Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for end-stage knee arthritis, improvements in surgical technique remain a necessity. Contemporary designs have bolstered durability, but longer life expectancies have placed an even greater emphasis on survivorship. Additionally, patient satisfaction remains an issue. A prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) is proposed to compare robotically-assisted versus manually executed primary (TKAs). This study is designed to address the major short-term clinically important issues between the two types of procedures with special emphasis on functional outcome. Patients will be randomized to receive either a robotically-assisted or a manually-executed primary TKA.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
152
The surgeon digitizes the shape of the joint and the computer transfers the planned surgical strategy to a dedicated surgical robot. Resections are performed by the surgeon on a constrained guide held by the robot.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Mayo Clinic Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Radiographic Parameters
Knee radiographs including an anteroposterior (AP) view and true lateral view, plus a patellar view
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.